hell yea throw it hereRedderious wrote:^^^Want a cookie?





hell yea throw it hereRedderious wrote:^^^Want a cookie?
Well if anyone's doing that, they're dumb, because FB is a rather public place to cheat and we will find out!wub wrote:BevOh wrote:I did notice one track got 6 votes out of no where tho, i sense tomfoolery!
Therein lies the issue - when you're not using DSF as the poll host, it means people could potentially just spam the URL to everyone on their Facebook chat.
i wanted to change mine the day after i posted it! wish i'd worked on it more, ran out of time.Sparxy wrote:Listened again at home on the monitors, really tasty tracks in there. Listened to mine again and wanna change the mixdown already
SoundcloudHurtdeer wrote:lets be honest they're all going to be dildos or penises or buttplugs aren't they
Electric_Head wrote:ic Beta jumped from 4 to 15 overnight.
Hell yeh, this sort of action is totally defeating the purpose of having a competition.wub wrote:Electric_Head wrote:ic Beta jumped from 4 to 15 overnight.
This ^^
I'm going to contact Haack and get a list of what tunes belong to what members. Anyone considered to have irregular voting patterns may be named and shamed.
um4mi wrote:Yeah it's pretty easy to vote a bunch of times.
this competition has been an absolute farce. beta is my shit tune, theres no way it deserves to win, its not even half finished. its clear someone has posted a load of votes just to mess up the results, i can promise you it wasn't me. i'd like to win if there was an honest voting system in place and i'd actually made a good tune. more for the feedback really. but this is just a joke, which is why i'm not just going to sit by while you all discuss who 'cheated'.wub wrote:Electric_Head wrote:ic Beta jumped from 4 to 15 overnight.
This ^^
I'm going to contact Haack and get a list of what tunes belong to what members. Anyone considered to have irregular voting patterns may be named and shamed.
Apologies if my previous post came across as accusatory. It wasn't my intentionVirtualMark wrote:which is why i'm not just going to sit by while you all discuss who 'cheated'.
TBH, I'm not entirely sure the voting site that is being used for this contest has that level of complexity. It seems to be geared more towards opinion polls than rigid competitions.VirtualMark wrote:simply checking the ip addresses with forum members vs the poll results should give an indication of who's done this. oh, and for the record, if i were to try to cheat, i'd at least be smart enough to do it from multiple computers over the course of a few days. not a ton of votes overnight.
This is the 31st sample pack contest that has been run, and so far Haack has done an outstanding job in all previous contests. He has my total support in how the contests are run.VirtualMark wrote:doubt i'll even bother with this again unless its run properly
no worries.wub wrote:Apologies if my previous post came across as accusatory. It wasn't my intentionVirtualMark wrote:which is why i'm not just going to sit by while you all discuss who 'cheated'.
this is the first one i have entered. its been an interesting experience, as i'd never mangled samples to the extent i did on this one. however, its hard to argue that this one hasn't been run badly. i'm just going by my experience, if you say they've all been run ok in the past then i'll give the next one a go.wub wrote:This is the 31st sample pack contest that has been run, and so far Haack has done an outstanding job in all previous contests. He has my total support in how the contests are run.VirtualMark wrote:doubt i'll even bother with this again unless its run properly
Electric_Head wrote:That makes this a farce I`m afraid.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests