wub wrote:mIrReN wrote:LA_Boxers wrote:I challenge anybody to stay impartial in situations like this.
Challenge accepted, a NEWS REPORTERS JOB = to stay impartial, if you KNOW you can't be impartial you shouldn't be reporting the subject imho
Utter bollocks IMO. Objective journalism is one of the reasons world politics/economics are so fucked up right now. "I just covered the story, I gave a balanced view" is the argument of a pussy. Most journalists need to grow a fucking pair and actually put an opinion across as opposed to just regurgitating identikit press releases and facts. Anyone c
.unt can report the facts. I want someone give me their own opinion on it. If I don't like it, I'll look elsewhere for an opinion that I do like. But I want the choice.
what are you on about???
you're basically saying if you don't agree with a reporters opinion, you'll look for an opinion you do like regardless of whether its closer to the truth or not
the job of a news reporter is to report facts about situations around the world
the quality of news report is judged by the legitimacy, and quality of the both the factual content and the way it is expressed
its a reporters job to be impartial when it comes to factual content in their articles, they can't just make them up to satisfy an agenda - thats madness!
interpretation of the facts is a different matter, but a GOOD reader should almost entirely disregard those elements of a report, those elements which turn a report into a story, cross reference the facts with all other stories on the same subject and then form THEIR OWN opinion of the 'story'
not just shop around until they find something which fits their world view irrespective of its truth value