have a listen
drop comments in either here or soundcloud
if you like what you hear give it a favourite, its only one button
safe
Viers
viers - spasm [does it matter?]
viers - spasm [does it matter?]
Soundcloud
have a listen
drop comments in either here or soundcloud
if you like what you hear give it a favourite, its only one button
safe
Viers
have a listen
drop comments in either here or soundcloud
if you like what you hear give it a favourite, its only one button
safe
Viers
Last edited by jsaxton on Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
kotku wrote:if something sounds like shit and is not pop then it's techno, or is this definition flawed aswell?
Re: viers - spasm [future juke]
thank you, because thats a helpful comment...incnic wrote:[future juke]
AKA
[FAILURE]
/
kotku wrote:if something sounds like shit and is not pop then it's techno, or is this definition flawed aswell?
Re: viers - spasm [future juke]
lolincnic wrote:[future juke]
AKA
[FAILURE]
/
i actually quite like it but that voal thing needs more automation on (reverb levels etc) it gets a abit boaring
also needs more snares
Re: viers - spasm [future juke]
Dear Sirincnic wrote:[future juke]
AKA
[FAILURE]
/
You have a lot of attitude for a man who has a picture of a cock shooting jizz as your avatar.
for the tune, sounds decent, but is lacking a bit of energy, sounds a bit tired. make it louder, a bit more hectic (not too much, could ruin it) and you're golden.
Re: viers - spasm [future juke]
pretty helpful in some ways, adding future to anything makes it sound pretty shit imo. but hey! the track is good, more variety would be nice.jsaxton wrote:thank you, because thats a helpful comment...incnic wrote:[future juke]
AKA
[FAILURE]
/
Re: viers - spasm [future juke]
the reason i added future was because as shit as it may sound it was future garage/jukeshankstep wrote:pretty helpful in some ways, adding future to anything makes it sound pretty shit imo. but hey! the track is good, more variety would be nice.jsaxton wrote:thank you, because thats a helpful comment...incnic wrote:[future juke]
AKA
[FAILURE]
/
and if you think the label future garage sucks, i realise that but its the easiest way to get across what kind of sound it is.
also the new version i did is more uk funky than anything so i think this doesnt have any relevence anymore
kotku wrote:if something sounds like shit and is not pop then it's techno, or is this definition flawed aswell?
Re: viers - spasm [future juke]
yeah the tune is alright, but the name future juke is just stupid. future garage is a stupid name. the tune doesnt even have any juke in it either, so i dunno how it can be future juke if it dont bare any resembelence to juke in the first place, sounds more funky to me really.
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
Re: viers - spasm [does it matter?]
right i changed the topic title since everyone was so bothered by it, can we comment on the tune now.
actual feedback would be very helpful.
actual feedback would be very helpful.
kotku wrote:if something sounds like shit and is not pop then it's techno, or is this definition flawed aswell?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests