anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
they are clearly fucking stnuc who don't have a clue about the environment they exist in... people who dis sampling culture, hip hop and EDM like that are just closed off to it, don't listen to it, pretend they're better because they play guitars
if u send me the song i'll send u back a .wav of a comparable piano sample that's close but not too close to their song, i've gotten pretty good at recording my buddy's grand, and he's got insane chops so he could prob play anything.
Then you could drop it in the project and send them a copy telling them to eat a dick.
if u send me the song i'll send u back a .wav of a comparable piano sample that's close but not too close to their song, i've gotten pretty good at recording my buddy's grand, and he's got insane chops so he could prob play anything.
Then you could drop it in the project and send them a copy telling them to eat a dick.
Soundcloud
SOME SONGS AND TUNES :|
SOME SONGS AND TUNES :|
-
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
- Location: UK
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
come on mate, you have to tell us who the band was 

- kaiori breathe
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:26 am
- Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Pro tip: They could have easily been polite and asked you not to release it in diplomatic terms, instead they threatened you with legal action, with that in mind I wouldn't tell anybody what band it was, no matter how many people ask, don't reward that kind of in your face attitude by giving them attention.
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Okay. It's not people treating you "however they want". This guy stole something from someone elses song, and they told him they do not want him to do that. Which is perfectley fine, and they did NOTHING wrong. They're not treating him terribly. All that stuff you said you would do seems very childish...snick01 wrote:arktrix wrote:Or he could be an adult, take the hit and scrap it or re-record the part for himself.snick01 wrote:Id put it on as many sites as possible for free download and email them all the links just in spite. probably paying with fire that though haha.so now im an adult, people can treat me however they want and i will just take it, because i am now an adult.
![]()
![]()
sounds fun

-
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
- Location: UK
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
so they were the first people to use this combination of notes/chords? the first people to create this sound?WereWolf wrote:This guy stole something from someone elses song
truth is you don't know any of that, and common courtesy doesn't cost anything.
as far as i'm concerned he didn't steal a thing - he made a tune then ASKED FOR PERMISSION to use it. he hasn't released it, as he was denied the permission. so what exactly has been stolen?
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
like it or not sampling without permission is stealing
- Kilo beats
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:31 am
- Location: South West UK
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
i dont want this thread to turn into a moralls of sampling thred. i really do see both sides of the argument, which is why i asked for permission, was just a bit annoyed i got such a reply from a "well established" band.
the song i used was nox arcania - crystal palace
the song i used was nox arcania - crystal palace
- Kilo beats
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:31 am
- Location: South West UK
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
wait... i just posted one of there songs online without asking.. is that legal?
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Unless you are making any financial gain from it you are not breaking the law
this band sound like dicks!!
this band sound like dicks!!
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
f!@# rights, f%$# law. post it on every forum for free download under different production name. then go occupy your local civic center. Maybe burn a police cruiser while your at it.
-
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
- Location: UK
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
should be pretty straightforward to play the notes from this in another instrument. i can see why they're moaning, its about all this songs got.Kilo beats wrote:i dont want this thread to turn into a moralls of sampling thred. i really do see both sides of the argument, which is why i asked for permission, was just a bit annoyed i got such a reply from a "well established" band.
the song i used was nox arcania - crystal palace

Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Yeah you can recreate that in any synth easily I reckon
- Kilo beats
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:31 am
- Location: South West UK
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
yeah, lol i could remake it easy, and have more control with how it fits in the mix. but whats the point? id still be "stealing" it
stuff it.... i think thats what ill do today... i got a nice new synth plug that i only been messing about with, may as well put it to use.
then ital be an original work, no hassle or legal fees, and can go on my first LP no problem.
cheers again for the responces peoples!
stuff it.... i think thats what ill do today... i got a nice new synth plug that i only been messing about with, may as well put it to use.
then ital be an original work, no hassle or legal fees, and can go on my first LP no problem.
cheers again for the responces peoples!
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
How long is the sample? In the states, you can have up to seven seconds of anything you want and there's nothing they can do about it. (Also possible - US law doesn't apply.)

Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
as bad as it sounds, you should have never told them about it
Datsik - Firepower = Big L
Jack Dixon - Somebody said = mario winans
James Blake - Cmyk = kelis(i hate you so much right now)
Tunnidge - Dark Skies = Blade Runner
i don't know if any of them got samples cleared but i highly doubt it.
Datsik - Firepower = Big L
Jack Dixon - Somebody said = mario winans
James Blake - Cmyk = kelis(i hate you so much right now)
Tunnidge - Dark Skies = Blade Runner
i don't know if any of them got samples cleared but i highly doubt it.
From Sound On Sound MagazineIn the normal course of events, when permission to sample is given there will be a fee for the privilege. The value of a sample, as well as the method of payment, will be determined by a range of factors, including:
The notoriety of the original record and prominence of the sampled work in the new record.
Puff Daddy’s ode to Biggie Smalls, ‘I’ll Be Missing You’, sampled the worldwide Police smash ‘Every Breath You Take’, thus sacrificing £500,000 in publishing royalties to its author, Sting.
The likelihood of your success with your record. The territory, format of distribution, status of the artist and marketing spend all affect how your new version will be perceived, and therefore how much you’ll be charged for the sample.
Contrary to popular myth, samples aren’t billed on a per-second basis like some phone calls — nor are they free when under three seconds long. The overall impact of the sample, together with all relevant commercial factors, means that each sample is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
For the dance producer looking to issue a limited self-release, it’s best to obtain a buy-out of all rights in the sample for a one-off flat fee. This would allow the producer to release the record and not incur further expense were the track to be picked up by a major label or licensed on compilations worldwide.
A major artist will be able to charge top dollar for the right to sample their work.
They’ll probably expect an advance payment running into thousands of pounds, as well as future royalties of approximately 1-5 percent on every record sold. These additional costs should be factored into your budget for the release.
Similarly, a stubborn or opportunistic publisher may demand 50-100 percent of the publishing income for the privilege of using their words or music.
-
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Jas0n wrote:How long is the sample? In the states, you can have up to seven seconds of anything you want and there's nothing they can do about it. (Also possible - US law doesn't apply.)
that is definitely not true
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Ouch man. Nox Arcana? Yeah do your research before you go sampling indiscriminately. It's not a band at the moment by the way, it's one guy named Joseph Vargo. The nasty response you got was most certainly not from a greedy corporate record label, it was from Vargo himself. Nox Arcana's albums are published by Vargo's own company, Monolith Graphics.
I discovered Nox Arcana years ago in my er..."goth" phase. In a way I admire him. He writes all his music, markets and distributes it on his own label, creates the album artwork himself and writes detailed backstories for each concept album. He's an accomplished artist and a decent author as well. He's had so many people rip off his music without permission that I can understand why he's touchy about it. To produce as much as he does requires serious effort, so I can almost understand not wanting your hard work to go to embellishing a musician's work whom you don't really appreciate.
Yes, Vargo has no respect for electronic music and he's not at all secretive about it. Unfortunately for you, there's nothing you can do about his decision. It's his work, he has all the rights to it, and if he doesn't want to let you sample it that's his prerogative. I'm not excusing his rudeness at all. You actually bothered to ask for permission and he was a jackass about it. You can do what others have suggested and rerecord it yourself, but why not one-up him and improve on his own melody? Just to prove that we're not all talentless thieves or whatever.
What I find most ironic of all though is that Vargo has mentioned in interviews that he does use a DAW and midi controller for some of his songs. He has never (to my knowledge) specified which one. Yes, he composes on the piano and has a number of acoustic instruments at his disposal but whatever. On top of that, I find it impossible to believe that he creates ALL of his sounds by himself. The hooks and melodies, yes. But his music is full of chanting, howls, creaky doors slamming, eerie cackles, all kinds of things that must have been sampled from somewhere. He's good, but he can't be that good.
Screw him. If it's good and you believe in it, try to find a way to make that tune work without his sample. There are a lot of sites that have piano samples that are free or dirt cheap. You shouldn't be limited by anyone's arrogant hostility to electronic music.
I discovered Nox Arcana years ago in my er..."goth" phase. In a way I admire him. He writes all his music, markets and distributes it on his own label, creates the album artwork himself and writes detailed backstories for each concept album. He's an accomplished artist and a decent author as well. He's had so many people rip off his music without permission that I can understand why he's touchy about it. To produce as much as he does requires serious effort, so I can almost understand not wanting your hard work to go to embellishing a musician's work whom you don't really appreciate.
Yes, Vargo has no respect for electronic music and he's not at all secretive about it. Unfortunately for you, there's nothing you can do about his decision. It's his work, he has all the rights to it, and if he doesn't want to let you sample it that's his prerogative. I'm not excusing his rudeness at all. You actually bothered to ask for permission and he was a jackass about it. You can do what others have suggested and rerecord it yourself, but why not one-up him and improve on his own melody? Just to prove that we're not all talentless thieves or whatever.
What I find most ironic of all though is that Vargo has mentioned in interviews that he does use a DAW and midi controller for some of his songs. He has never (to my knowledge) specified which one. Yes, he composes on the piano and has a number of acoustic instruments at his disposal but whatever. On top of that, I find it impossible to believe that he creates ALL of his sounds by himself. The hooks and melodies, yes. But his music is full of chanting, howls, creaky doors slamming, eerie cackles, all kinds of things that must have been sampled from somewhere. He's good, but he can't be that good.
Screw him. If it's good and you believe in it, try to find a way to make that tune work without his sample. There are a lot of sites that have piano samples that are free or dirt cheap. You shouldn't be limited by anyone's arrogant hostility to electronic music.
- ShadowMachine
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:32 am
- Location: London, Canada
- Contact:
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
I GOT AN AMAZING IDEA!!!....
PUT THE STEMS UP AND LET EVERYONE REMIX IT....
make a massive ...massive free release...and send it to the band....
that...to me at least, is perfect, absolute perfect way, to say screw you and cram it with wallnuts!
there prolly just pissed cuz your tunes better then theres and will most likely get more sales lol
LONG LIVE THE STEP!
PUT THE STEMS UP AND LET EVERYONE REMIX IT....
make a massive ...massive free release...and send it to the band....
that...to me at least, is perfect, absolute perfect way, to say screw you and cram it with wallnuts!
there prolly just pissed cuz your tunes better then theres and will most likely get more sales lol
LONG LIVE THE STEP!
“Our generation has an incredible amount of realism, yet at the same time it loves to complain and not really change. Because, if it does change, then it won't have anything to complain about.”
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
I really can't offer anything than what people already have, but this is a good post...Izomorph wrote:Ouch man. Nox Arcana? Yeah do your research before you go sampling indiscriminately. It's not a band at the moment by the way, it's one guy named Joseph Vargo. The nasty response you got was most certainly not from a greedy corporate record label, it was from Vargo himself. Nox Arcana's albums are published by Vargo's own company, Monolith Graphics.
I discovered Nox Arcana years ago in my er..."goth" phase. In a way I admire him. He writes all his music, markets and distributes it on his own label, creates the album artwork himself and writes detailed backstories for each concept album. He's an accomplished artist and a decent author as well. He's had so many people rip off his music without permission that I can understand why he's touchy about it. To produce as much as he does requires serious effort, so I can almost understand not wanting your hard work to go to embellishing a musician's work whom you don't really appreciate.
Yes, Vargo has no respect for electronic music and he's not at all secretive about it. Unfortunately for you, there's nothing you can do about his decision. It's his work, he has all the rights to it, and if he doesn't want to let you sample it that's his prerogative. I'm not excusing his rudeness at all. You actually bothered to ask for permission and he was a jackass about it. You can do what others have suggested and rerecord it yourself, but why not one-up him and improve on his own melody? Just to prove that we're not all talentless thieves or whatever.
What I find most ironic of all though is that Vargo has mentioned in interviews that he does use a DAW and midi controller for some of his songs. He has never (to my knowledge) specified which one. Yes, he composes on the piano and has a number of acoustic instruments at his disposal but whatever. On top of that, I find it impossible to believe that he creates ALL of his sounds by himself. The hooks and melodies, yes. But his music is full of chanting, howls, creaky doors slamming, eerie cackles, all kinds of things that must have been sampled from somewhere. He's good, but he can't be that good.
Screw him. If it's good and you believe in it, try to find a way to make that tune work without his sample. There are a lot of sites that have piano samples that are free or dirt cheap. You shouldn't be limited by anyone's arrogant hostility to electronic music.
Improve his own melody, definitely should be doing that!
Re: anyone here Copyright law savvy? $150,000 fine threat
Just re-create the melody. No one can prove you copied it. Just say you played your piano and got this melody in your head.
If they sue you, ask them to prove they own that melody/ keys. If they play that track and say they have used it before you, then just say maybe they have copied it from someone else.
If they sue you, ask them to prove they own that melody/ keys. If they play that track and say they have used it before you, then just say maybe they have copied it from someone else.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests