Time signatures
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- karmacazee
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:11 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Time signatures
So lots of people say that dance music should be in 4/4 because it's easier to dance to, and that it's easier to mix.
But why hasn't there ever been a style in, say 3/4? It's a really energetic time signature when played with speed. Or 5/4, that extra step could make for some funky dance moves.
And mental combinations of polyrhythms such as 4 over 3 sound awesome when done right.
I'm talking specifically dance-floor friendly music.
Don't tell me people can't dance to different time signatures! I won't have it! And don't tell me DJ's can't count in 3's!
Or does something like that already exist?
But why hasn't there ever been a style in, say 3/4? It's a really energetic time signature when played with speed. Or 5/4, that extra step could make for some funky dance moves.
And mental combinations of polyrhythms such as 4 over 3 sound awesome when done right.
I'm talking specifically dance-floor friendly music.
Don't tell me people can't dance to different time signatures! I won't have it! And don't tell me DJ's can't count in 3's!
Or does something like that already exist?
SoundcloudAgent 47 wrote: but oldschool stone island lager drinking hooligan slag fucking takeaway fighting man child is the one
http://www.novacoda.co.uk
Re: Time signatures
different time signatures are just plain annoying
messes with your head too much
messes with your head too much
- Bandersson
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:29 pm
Re: Time signatures
Jas0n wrote:I take it you aren't familiar with "waltz".
OP im with you!
6/8 would probably work really good in a fast dnb track methinks.
- extremesociety
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:21 pm
- Location: Brooklyn.
- Contact:
Re: Time signatures
I have two remixes where at the ends I've tagged on odd meters. Dunno how these would translate to a club setting though...people would probably be falling down
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society <--- Aaliyah "Try Again" has a part at the end in 5/4, Alicia Keys "Fallin" has a bridge in 7/4.
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society <--- Aaliyah "Try Again" has a part at the end in 5/4, Alicia Keys "Fallin" has a bridge in 7/4.
///// New EP ///// Download for free here: http://www.nitemute.com
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society
http://soundcloud.com/rvlouie
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society
http://soundcloud.com/rvlouie
Re: Time signatures
there's a lot of dubstep and DnB that can be thought of as in 6/8, even though it's been written as a triplet-heavy 4/4 track. It's only really set in stone when there's a proper score. (Phaeleh - Perilous is a good example - it probably said 4/4 in his DAW and he just used a lot of triplets but a lot of musos analysing it would say that it's 6/8 but at a different tempo) I saw a thread on here somewhere a few weeks ago about 3/4 tracks, they are out there 
i'd recommend listening to Venetian Snares if you're not already familiar with his stuff, it's nearly all in 7/8 and i'd imagine a lot of dubstep fans would enjoy it
i'd recommend listening to Venetian Snares if you're not already familiar with his stuff, it's nearly all in 7/8 and i'd imagine a lot of dubstep fans would enjoy it
http://www.facebook.com/1point5
http://soundcloud.com/1point5
1point5 - Void (Rinse FM Rip) - Chip Butty Records
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/1point5
1point5 - Void (Rinse FM Rip) - Chip Butty Records
Soundcloud
Re: Time signatures
Not sure if troll...Sheff wrote:different time signatures are just plain annoying
messes with your head too much
But yeah I've been digging on VS lately and thinking odd time sigs would lead to more creative tracks. My friends ep was all in 6/4 I believe, Mixed Medium on SC n iTunes
- extremesociety
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:21 pm
- Location: Brooklyn.
- Contact:
Re: Time signatures
I mean, not dubstep, but very much next level 7/4 (7/8)
///// New EP ///// Download for free here: http://www.nitemute.com
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society
http://soundcloud.com/rvlouie
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society
http://soundcloud.com/rvlouie
Re: Time signatures
I suppose if you're producing with the mindset of your track being played out, it would help to have it in standard 4/4 timing.
Re: Time signatures
As a DJ who does play out... I wouldn't even briefly consider playing a tune anything different than 4/4... Just totally unnecessary in my opinion.karmacazee wrote:So lots of people say that dance music should be in 4/4 because it's easier to dance to, and that it's easier to mix.
But why hasn't there ever been a style in, say 3/4? It's a really energetic time signature when played with speed. Or 5/4, that extra step could make for some funky dance moves.
And mental combinations of polyrhythms such as 4 over 3 sound awesome when done right.
I'm talking specifically dance-floor friendly music.
Don't tell me people can't dance to different time signatures! I won't have it! And don't tell me DJ's can't count in 3's!
Or does something like that already exist?
Abstrakt.
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
- DJ Sampletank
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Time signatures
Totally, his work showcases what can be done in this, and other weirder time signatures. Like said already, it's probably best to keep it 4/4 if your aiming for the track being played out in clubs or such.1point5 wrote:i'd recommend listening to Venetian Snares if you're not already familiar with his stuff, it's nearly all in 7/8 and i'd imagine a lot of dubstep fans would enjoy it
All this chatter has made me yearn to write a track in a different signature. (and listen to Hajnal by Venetian Snares)
Re: Time signatures
both in 3/4
thats 4/4 but im sure there are some beats missed out at certain points cos it like new sections seem to start too early
and im sure in Unglued by Objekt he said it goes into 7/8 at some point during the intro, probably that mental bit haha
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
- karmacazee
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:11 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: Time signatures
Why are different time sigs considered unnecessary?
SoundcloudAgent 47 wrote: but oldschool stone island lager drinking hooligan slag fucking takeaway fighting man child is the one
http://www.novacoda.co.uk
Re: Time signatures
Because mixing them is a completely unnecessary pain in the rectum in complete honesty...karmacazee wrote:Why are different time sigs considered unnecessary?
Abstrakt.
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
- frankiegrimes
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:57 am
- Location: Dublin
Re: Time signatures
People also don't know how to dance to anything that's not 4/4 based, and anything properly in 3 sounds like folk music. Mosca got away with it by having most of the percussion not emphasizing the 3/4 rhythm.
Went to a Venetian Snares gig before, and only about a third of the crowd actually understood the rhythm and were moving in time, the rest were just jumping about randomly.
Went to a Venetian Snares gig before, and only about a third of the crowd actually understood the rhythm and were moving in time, the rest were just jumping about randomly.
Re: Time signatures
That too... Anyone with a name like Frank has got to know what he is on about.frankiegrimes wrote:People also don't know how to dance to anything that's not 4/4 based, and anything properly in 3 sounds like folk music. Mosca got away with it by having most of the percussion not emphasizing the 3/4 rhythm.
Went to a Venetian Snares gig before, and only about a third of the crowd actually understood the rhythm and were moving in time, the rest were just jumping about randomly.
Abstrakt.
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
Re: Time signatures
I take a lot of ideas for bass drops from mathcorecore breakdowns.
Yes, it's weird to dance, but for a bridge when things get intense it's the shit.
<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q5qvft2i-s" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>
Yes, it's weird to dance, but for a bridge when things get intense it's the shit.
<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q5qvft2i-s" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>
Re: Time signatures
both of those mosca tracks are 4/4.
nothign wrong with trying diff time signatures but i don't think it'll get played out much
nothign wrong with trying diff time signatures but i don't think it'll get played out much
Re: Time signatures
Never understood the big deal about time signatures. I used to 'sing' in a Dillinger Escape Plan'esque band when I was 16. At one point I got guitar lessons from a friend and he thought I did well except he thought that I didn't understand rhythm too well because I played a bunch of things that he taught me in a different time signature. It's not that I didn't get '4/4', just that I thought the groove was better in whatever timesig I was playing and 4/4 doesn't feel any more 'natural' to me than other time signatures.
When I first started making beats I just...... did it. It was in Renoise so I just made beats and adjusted the number of lines to sound like I wanted them to sound. I'd really only check the timesig out of curiosity afterwards. Now most of my stuff is 4/4, but for the longest time It was just odd time stuff.
And modern dance music is largely based on disco music, through house. All four-to-the-floors. I think that's where the convention comes from.
When I first started making beats I just...... did it. It was in Renoise so I just made beats and adjusted the number of lines to sound like I wanted them to sound. I'd really only check the timesig out of curiosity afterwards. Now most of my stuff is 4/4, but for the longest time It was just odd time stuff.
And modern dance music is largely based on disco music, through house. All four-to-the-floors. I think that's where the convention comes from.

namsayin
:'0
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Re: Time signatures
Boring DJ imoB-Frank wrote:I wouldn't even briefly consider playing a tune anything different than 4/4...
I've been making nothing but 3/4 recently...I find it really interesting. Can't find anything to mix my stuff with though
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
