you hear his oldskool set last week?JBoy wrote:Plastician was acting high and mighty and his sets have been too shit for too long for me to even care that hes spat his dummy out and gone. Guaranteed he still has a lurker account anyway.
SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
soulkids wrote:inb4wiley
zomby vs. wiley on twitter would be like clash of the titans
Pedro Sánchez wrote:I'm sure it was Picasso, but it's a fucking ludicrous quote regardless. It should read 'Average artists copy, great artist are inspired'Suangi wrote:pretty sure Jobs stole that quote from StravinskySmoked Chief wrote:"Good artists copy, great artists steal."
- Steve Jobs, in Pirates of Silicon Valley (1999)
agreed.skimpi wrote:yeah you fuckin handle!!tacospheros wrote:you sir are one of those things on a door which you turn in order to open it
at least he added drums and a bassline and gave it new life, and like you said, he never sold it. i don't think that's comparable to what zomby did at all, which was taking someone else's work, not really changing or adding anything, and then calling it his own. and then being cheeky enough to get it releasedfractal wrote:
loop by múm (although sbtrkt never sold this tune....)
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
Why not?CaveLvl wrote:Dillas name doesnt belong here.
SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
what can't you understand about the difference between sampling and stealing?fractal wrote:bah, that's just one example in a scene filled with them. guess no one was around in the eighties,,,
one of my favorite hip hop producers, 9th wonder, makes beats straight out of loops and get's paid for all of em
just curious as to how y'all feel about dilla? he made a lot of changes to loops but also just used loops straight up... or is it acceptable in hip hop? curious as to where you guys draw your lines
are you Reark?Lucifa wrote:what can't you understand about the difference between sampling and stealing?fractal wrote:bah, that's just one example in a scene filled with them. guess no one was around in the eighties,,,
one of my favorite hip hop producers, 9th wonder, makes beats straight out of loops and get's paid for all of em
just curious as to how y'all feel about dilla? he made a lot of changes to loops but also just used loops straight up... or is it acceptable in hip hop? curious as to where you guys draw your lines
Listen to what Reark has posted, actually listen to it, now tell me what Zomby did was just 'sampling'. He's literally just cut the intro, took out some vocal, and added little edits to the drums. That's it. The main body, content, synths, concept, and emotion of the track came from Reark. Yet Zomby feels entitled to release the track under his own name, openly brag about writing it himself, then profit of it without even the slightest credit to it's creator.
How anyone can compare that to cutting up a sample of something and interpreting it into an original piece of music is beyond me. It's not even a copyright/legality issue here, it's the moral bankruptcy of it.
No offence, but anyone who thinks Zomby is in no way in the wrong here is a dickhead. This is pure theft.
SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
well said.Lucifa wrote:what can't you understand about the difference between sampling and stealing?fractal wrote:bah, that's just one example in a scene filled with them. guess no one was around in the eighties,,,
one of my favorite hip hop producers, 9th wonder, makes beats straight out of loops and get's paid for all of em
just curious as to how y'all feel about dilla? he made a lot of changes to loops but also just used loops straight up... or is it acceptable in hip hop? curious as to where you guys draw your lines
Listen to what Reark has posted, actually listen to it, now tell me what Zomby did was just 'sampling'. He's literally just cut the intro, took out some vocal, and added little edits to the drums. That's it. The main body, content, synths, concept, and emotion of the track came from Reark. Yet Zomby feels entitled to release the track under his own name, openly brag about writing it himself, then profit of it without even the slightest credit to it's creator.
How anyone can compare that to cutting up a sample of something and interpreting it into an original piece of music is beyond me. It's not even a copyright/legality issue here, it's the moral bankruptcy of it.
No offence, but anyone who thinks Zomby is in no way in the wrong here is a dickhead. This is pure theft.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
