Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
hmmmm...interesting
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
the more i think i know about compression, the more i realize that no, i don't
its weird
sort of this holistic (non-)understanding that comes with time
its weird
sort of this holistic (non-)understanding that comes with time
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
Wow haha I must really not understand it, it seems pretty simple to me....but you guys treat it like it's an art form. Now I feel like I don't know it at all......
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
no, the experience and knowledge u have now is good
but
you'll probably find that you cycle between thinking you know most everything about it, and knowing that you really don't
first you start using it and you get the hang of it
then you start to learn more applications of it
and different compressors behave differently
and some are better and worse for certain sounds
and there's bus compression
and sometimes you know whats going on when you squash a sound
but one day you realize, you really didn't have a clue
and makeup gain... limiters, maximizers
its really hard to explain why, but over the years my "knowledge" of compression has gone up and down a lot
it all just comes down to applying it to tracks and having results
then looking back at the sound of your results from years ago vs. what you would do today
i have had moments where i "realized" i ought not to use ANY compression
and of course changed my mind
but you get the idea...
but
you'll probably find that you cycle between thinking you know most everything about it, and knowing that you really don't
first you start using it and you get the hang of it
then you start to learn more applications of it
and different compressors behave differently
and some are better and worse for certain sounds
and there's bus compression
and sometimes you know whats going on when you squash a sound
but one day you realize, you really didn't have a clue
and makeup gain... limiters, maximizers
its really hard to explain why, but over the years my "knowledge" of compression has gone up and down a lot
it all just comes down to applying it to tracks and having results
then looking back at the sound of your results from years ago vs. what you would do today
i have had moments where i "realized" i ought not to use ANY compression
and of course changed my mind
but you get the idea...
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
okay haha well right now I'm in a stage of blissful ignorance, thinking that I know how to use compression 
I usually use it to get a certain type of tone, or put it on a drum bus to glue my drums together a little bit
I usually use it to get a certain type of tone, or put it on a drum bus to glue my drums together a little bit
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
wait til u start tracking vocals and instruments with compression from a preamp
at the moment i've begun to realize how effective compression is for bringing things forward in a mix (as opposed to just volume)
what comps are u using primarily?
at the moment i've begun to realize how effective compression is for bringing things forward in a mix (as opposed to just volume)
what comps are u using primarily?
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
For compression, really only the stock logic compressor
-
didi
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
- Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ
- Contact:
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
Pro-C, and Pro-L.Today wrote:wait til u start tracking vocals and instruments with compression from a preamp
at the moment i've begun to realize how effective compression is for bringing things forward in a mix (as opposed to just volume)
what comps are u using primarily?
To be honest anything fabfilter.
also got a couple analogue imitation, etc. one's with character, nd a certain sound.
- Volatile Psycle
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:33 am
- Location: Norwich, UK
- Ghost of Muttley
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:32 am
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
It'd wanna be for 400 bux...get outta the box with a nice lil toft joint for not too much more than that...alright almost double but still..
- Volatile Psycle
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:33 am
- Location: Norwich, UK
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
The hardware unit is £2500!Ghost of Muttley wrote:It'd wanna be for 400 bux...
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
waves API everything r the donVolatile Psycle wrote:waves API 2500 is the don
thats gonna be my next bundle purchase. or the SSL's, not sure yet
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
I usually don't use mbcomps, just ableton's and waves c1 once in a while.
Mbcomps could be used for anything, but I feel they're best for drum busses, so that you can compress the kick, snare, perc all different amounts. if they're already seperated on different channels you can just use a compressor on each. it's handy, but almost too much for my needs. maybe if I start mixing for bands or something I would use it more.
and on the note of parallel comp, I see that no one has mentioned the dynamics, which are preserved better with parallel than other types of compression.
Mbcomps could be used for anything, but I feel they're best for drum busses, so that you can compress the kick, snare, perc all different amounts. if they're already seperated on different channels you can just use a compressor on each. it's handy, but almost too much for my needs. maybe if I start mixing for bands or something I would use it more.
and on the note of parallel comp, I see that no one has mentioned the dynamics, which are preserved better with parallel than other types of compression.
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
So for parallel compression you would layer a heavily compressed drum track with the same drum track which just hasn't been compressed at all, correct? And that gives it punchiness?
And yeah I usually send my drums to a bus with compression
And yeah I usually send my drums to a bus with compression
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
you can use a send to do it
put a compressor on the aux track with dramatic settings to really smash the drum hits
send a bit of each major drum to that aux (kick, snare, maybe hh etc)
use pre-fader send so that you can adjust the volume faders on each drum without affecting how much gets sent to the comp
then you can basically build two drum mixes, a majorly squashed and a dry
the mix of the two should give you volume, punch and presence without killing the hits' dynamics and character
put a compressor on the aux track with dramatic settings to really smash the drum hits
send a bit of each major drum to that aux (kick, snare, maybe hh etc)
use pre-fader send so that you can adjust the volume faders on each drum without affecting how much gets sent to the comp
then you can basically build two drum mixes, a majorly squashed and a dry
the mix of the two should give you volume, punch and presence without killing the hits' dynamics and character
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
Hmmm...what's the advantage of doing that vs just bouncing out the drums and creating a new track of them heavily compressed alongside the original?
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
it takes less time, and you can route multiple channels to the same parallel comp bus in different amounts - depending on the send level of the particular channel you're using.Sonika wrote:Hmmm...what's the advantage of doing that vs just bouncing out the drums and creating a new track of them heavily compressed alongside the original?
really though, all about your workflow, do whatever is easiest.
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
I'll play around with all of it. Thanks all 
-
inDistinkt
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:03 am
- Location: Boston
Re: Parallel Compression vs. Multiband Compression
In Logic's stock compressor all you have to do to parallel compress is click the triangle in the bottom left hand corner to open the extended parameters area and you can just set the wet/dry volumes with the slider. Afaik this is no different than setting up a send to an aux channel.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

