Semi complex question about mixing
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:37 am
Semi complex question about mixing
What effects are typically used on each separate instrument to get the final crystal clear mix, before the master. I know this question is extremely broad but I would like to get a general idea. Obviously people are going to say EQ , but what kind of EQ, and is there any reference on what instruments should be EQ'd at generally? Any good points of reference i can look at for mixing. already have read the moneyshot thread through a bunch of times too.
upstateface wrote:Mr. Frodo Bassbins,King of useless threads.![]()
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:00 am
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
As for Eqing, this link helped me really understand it.http://www.dnbscene.com/article/88-thin ... q-tutorial as for mixing better. Its a buttload of things. Some sounds might need to be compressed more than others. Adding reverb, limiter, all kinds of other things. Read the article as soon as you can and read it many times to understand it all.
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
What I like to do when trying to clear up a mix with a parametric EQ is make a boost (with a medium Q) and sweep throughout the whole frequency range. When you hear that bit where the mix sounds the least clear, make a note of it and then take a cut to it.
Usually cuts to the bass / low-mids help clear things up (along with hi-passing) however even the high mids cut sometimes can help clear up some of that fizz you can sometimes get.
Usually cuts to the bass / low-mids help clear things up (along with hi-passing) however even the high mids cut sometimes can help clear up some of that fizz you can sometimes get.
- NickyXplosion
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:58 am
- Location: Minniesota
- Contact:
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
IN ORDER OF NECESSITY
Limiter: Who wants clipping?
Parametric equalizer: Remember! A little does ALOT for mastering the final mix and use very wide Slopes
Multiband Compressor: Make those drum KICK!!!!
Spectrum You Need to be able to see what areas need help or not.
Stereoizer(Optional)
Buzzwords. By boosting or cutting the bands on your equalizers, you can make your sound more or less "airy" (16khz), "bright" (3-10kHz) "harsh" (which is excessive brightness) "edgy" and "brittle" (2-6k) "sweet" (a slight but wide cut at 2-8k), "warm" (slight upper bass boost and slight 4k cut). You can make your mix sound "thin" by reducing an wide band of frequencies from around 200-400 hz and make it "thick" by increasing those. If you increase it too much you'll have a "muddy" mix. Your bass can go from "missing" to "buried" to "solid", "fat", "boomy" depending on how you set the low frequency controls.
Limiter: Who wants clipping?
Parametric equalizer: Remember! A little does ALOT for mastering the final mix and use very wide Slopes
Multiband Compressor: Make those drum KICK!!!!
Spectrum You Need to be able to see what areas need help or not.
Stereoizer(Optional)
Buzzwords. By boosting or cutting the bands on your equalizers, you can make your sound more or less "airy" (16khz), "bright" (3-10kHz) "harsh" (which is excessive brightness) "edgy" and "brittle" (2-6k) "sweet" (a slight but wide cut at 2-8k), "warm" (slight upper bass boost and slight 4k cut). You can make your mix sound "thin" by reducing an wide band of frequencies from around 200-400 hz and make it "thick" by increasing those. If you increase it too much you'll have a "muddy" mix. Your bass can go from "missing" to "buried" to "solid", "fat", "boomy" depending on how you set the low frequency controls.
Last edited by NickyXplosion on Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.


Hardware: Akai APC40, Win7, Oxygen 25, UsbMic, UsbGuitar, Shecter 7-String
Speakers: 1000 watt 5.1, Line 6 spider 3 Halfstack
Exp:
Fl=3 years
Ableton=1 year
Guitar=6 years
*Music Theorist*
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
What? If your mix is clipping without a limiter, you're doing it wrong.NickyXplosion wrote:IN ORDER OF NECESSITY
Limiter: Who wants clipping?
- NickyXplosion
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:58 am
- Location: Minniesota
- Contact:
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
Look that My edit I posted
I dont know lol lower the decibels?:lol:
I dont know lol lower the decibels?:lol:


Hardware: Akai APC40, Win7, Oxygen 25, UsbMic, UsbGuitar, Shecter 7-String
Speakers: 1000 watt 5.1, Line 6 spider 3 Halfstack
Exp:
Fl=3 years
Ableton=1 year
Guitar=6 years
*Music Theorist*
- Killamike49
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 2:26 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
Reverb can help you place things, also, if something has no ambiance at all, it sounds weird to me.NickyXplosion wrote:Look that My edit I posted
I dont know lol lower the decibels?:lol:
Don't forget about panning, or compression. The order of your effects makes a drastic difference too. The longer the chain, the more obvious the change. Honestly, your mixes are probably just going to keep getting better with practice, not reading. But that dnbscene link is a good one. Dogsonacid has a fuckload of info too, so if you haven't checked it out, lurk for a few days.

Datsik ft snak the ripper- Fully Blown (Team Americuh remix)
Soundcloud
Dance Edit
Soundcloud
Call me Mike
Soundcloud
Dance Edit
Soundcloud
Call me Mike
pikeymobile wrote: mate im not even joking i once pulled out of a girl and liquid shit shot out about 3 feet down my bed
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
EQ.. whichever EQ you have, and on pretty much everything, bar subs.
Not to say you should have ridiculous dramatic curves boosting and cutting all over everything, but every track needs at least a rolloff, a notch here or there. thats how to get em to fit together
Not to say you should have ridiculous dramatic curves boosting and cutting all over everything, but every track needs at least a rolloff, a notch here or there. thats how to get em to fit together
- Killamike49
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 2:26 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
This. I hate to speak in absolutes, but you should ALWAYS EQ everything. Haha.Today wrote:EQ.. whichever EQ you have, and on pretty much everything, bar subs.
Not to say you should have ridiculous dramatic curves boosting and cutting all over everything, but every track needs at least a rolloff, a notch here or there. thats how to get em to fit together
Datsik ft snak the ripper- Fully Blown (Team Americuh remix)
Soundcloud
Dance Edit
Soundcloud
Call me Mike
Soundcloud
Dance Edit
Soundcloud
Call me Mike
pikeymobile wrote: mate im not even joking i once pulled out of a girl and liquid shit shot out about 3 feet down my bed
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
this article worked wonders for me as wellmalakasounds wrote:As for Eqing, this link helped me really understand it.http://www.dnbscene.com/article/88-thin ... q-tutorial as for mixing better. Its a buttload of things. Some sounds might need to be compressed more than others. Adding reverb, limiter, all kinds of other things. Read the article as soon as you can and read it many times to understand it all.

Dont get mad at the ignorant, educate them.
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
what the hell is a stereoizer do you mean stereo imager? And yeah there not optional there's more or less a necessityNickyXplosion wrote:Stereoizer(Optional)
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
whats up w putting stereo imaging on the master? I would use it on certain tracks, or maybe a bus, to spread mids and highs wider, but i feel like pushing the entire mix through that style of plugin could result in artifacts, or just a hollow sounding master
as opposed to just hard panning stuff, and doing individual tracks in order to push a stronger signal through spaces accross the stereo field, and get a cleaner master
tbh i haven't tried it but i'll toss one on the master channel later and see what i can hear
as opposed to just hard panning stuff, and doing individual tracks in order to push a stronger signal through spaces accross the stereo field, and get a cleaner master
tbh i haven't tried it but i'll toss one on the master channel later and see what i can hear
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
I just use it to tighten up te low stuff that's about it everything else is panning and subtle reverbToday wrote:whats up w putting stereo imaging on the master? I would use it on certain tracks, or maybe a bus, to spread mids and highs wider, but i feel like pushing the entire mix through that style of plugin could result in artifacts, or just a hollow sounding master
as opposed to just hard panning stuff, and doing individual tracks in order to push a stronger signal through spaces accross the stereo field, and get a cleaner master
tbh i haven't tried it but i'll toss one on the master channel later and see what i can hear
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
it's a great tool if you want your mix to sound like shit on anything but itunesToday wrote:whats up w putting stereo imaging on the master? I would use it on certain tracks, or maybe a bus, to spread mids and highs wider, but i feel like pushing the entire mix through that style of plugin could result in artifacts, or just a hollow sounding master
as opposed to just hard panning stuff, and doing individual tracks in order to push a stronger signal through spaces accross the stereo field, and get a cleaner master
tbh i haven't tried it but i'll toss one on the master channel later and see what i can hear

twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
Re: Semi complex question about mixing
prolly the best article on eqing ever written!!! there's a follow-up tut about compression here: http://www.dnbscene.com/article/1474-co ... n-tutorialmalakasounds wrote:As for Eqing, this link helped me really understand it.http://www.dnbscene.com/article/88-thin ... q-tutorial as for mixing better. Its a buttload of things. Some sounds might need to be compressed more than others. Adding reverb, limiter, all kinds of other things. Read the article as soon as you can and read it many times to understand it all.

Re: Semi complex question about mixing
Imager on the master is a no-no. If you can do it channel by channel, DO IT CHANNEL BY CHANNEL. Mastering engineers use it because they have no way of getting to channel by channel but since it's your mix, do it channel by channel.
A return track with a highpass, stereo imager is better because you have control over sends.
A return track with a highpass, stereo imager is better because you have control over sends.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests