RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
bigdaveo11
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:06 am
Location: Seattle, WA

RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by bigdaveo11 » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:16 pm

Hey guys,

I have two quick question in regards to referencing other tracks. Recently I have been putting a reference track on an audio channel in my arrangement to constantly switch back and forth between to check my original levels. I know the track has been mastered so my questions are as follows...

1. how do I go about matching the loudness levels? Obviously by ear is my best bet but is there a method to match them somewhat close using the level fader which leads my to my next question 2. regarding comparisons between RMS and peak levels when trying to get your tracks to sound similar to professional tracks, granted they have been professionally mastered so I wasn't sure if it was a good idea to even be concerned with RMS/peak levels of reference tracks.

Apologies if these questions seem confusing, as I am having trouble stating exactly what it is I am trying to ask.

Appreciate your time.
Check out my monthly podcast!
http://soundcloud.com/start-a-ripple-podcast

User avatar
ehbes
Posts: 19109
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by ehbes » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:22 pm

Are you comparing your mix to a mastered track?
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

didi
Posts: 3788
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ
Contact:

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by didi » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:31 pm

Whack the reference track into your daw. Route it to a free mixer channel and set the faders so that it has a matched subjective loudness level to the track you're making.

Then mix to match the power, and quality of the mix. This way your ear won't be fooled into thinking the channel with the greater subjective volume is the better mix.

Once you've matched the punchiness and the power of your pro track, give it to your ME, and reap the rewards.
[+]
bennyfroobs wrote:cool it vip is one of the best funky tracks of all time, hands down
[+]
Agent 47 wrote:photek? who is photek

photek is my mate whos a house dj from london lol
[+]
wolf89 wrote:Me and my mates play a game where we remember the worst or most obscure nu metal bands we can and listen to them when drunk

bigdaveo11
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:06 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by bigdaveo11 » Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:17 pm

yup^ what I was trying to accomplish. Helps me get the relative levels of the instruments "right" and match punchiness/power. I was just unsure about how to match the volume levels and bring the mastered track down to what level? I know its a by ear process but was wondering if peak/RMS had anything to do with it and if numbers could give me a ballpark range ya know??

Anyways thanks guys.
Check out my monthly podcast!
http://soundcloud.com/start-a-ripple-podcast

User avatar
mitchAUS
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:31 pm

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by mitchAUS » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:14 am

bigdaveo11 wrote: was wondering if peak/RMS had anything to do with it and if numbers could give me a ballpark range ya know??
Yeah rms should get you close, but subjective loudness isn't a hard thing to work out by ear. Be careful what you use as a reference track tho. I wouldn't bother with something thats been brick walled to the high heavens. Decisions are far more transparent IMO, if your reference track has retained a lot of dynamic range even after mastering. Voxengo span has a meter mode where it shows dynamic range in the metre. Can be a useful tool in confirming what you think your hearing.

e-motion
Posts: 400
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:36 am

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by e-motion » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:19 am

Yeah for mixing, RMS all the way. Using peak levels, your track will sound like shit because it ain't mastered, so it will be much lower in loudness than the other (and louder = better psychoaccoustically).

bigdaveo11
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:06 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by bigdaveo11 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:01 pm

Good points, thanks guys. Did not know that about Voxengo, sounds very useful.
Check out my monthly podcast!
http://soundcloud.com/start-a-ripple-podcast

User avatar
mitchAUS
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:31 pm

Re: RMS vs Peak and Track Referencing

Post by mitchAUS » Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:01 am

bigdaveo11 wrote:Good points, thanks guys. Did not know that about Voxengo, sounds very useful.
And it's free :h:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests