One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Just thought I'd share this problem that I just got over,
I'd always seen things about instruments having their "body" of frequencies that they live in, and thought that those were the only places those frequencies could survive in. I would cut all my kicks off at 200, cut my snares below 200 and above 15k, hi hats below 13k, pads outside of the 600-7k range and so on and so on.. Yesterday, however, it kinda clicked for me that this was not the way this works. I went back through one of my better arranged tracks, and bypassed all my EQ's and my track instantly sounded fuller and better overall. I mean I still needed to make some necessary cuts, but nothing drastic like before.
Has anyone else gone through something similar to this? I figured maybe this info could help out some other beginner that is going through this problem. Thoughts?
I'd always seen things about instruments having their "body" of frequencies that they live in, and thought that those were the only places those frequencies could survive in. I would cut all my kicks off at 200, cut my snares below 200 and above 15k, hi hats below 13k, pads outside of the 600-7k range and so on and so on.. Yesterday, however, it kinda clicked for me that this was not the way this works. I went back through one of my better arranged tracks, and bypassed all my EQ's and my track instantly sounded fuller and better overall. I mean I still needed to make some necessary cuts, but nothing drastic like before.
Has anyone else gone through something similar to this? I figured maybe this info could help out some other beginner that is going through this problem. Thoughts?
Tracks coming.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
It really depends track to track. A lot of people just cut according to a set way, but it changes greatly depending on the sounds in the track. EQing should always be done according to need. sometimes a channel needs nothing according to what the rest of the song needs. I did the same thing you did when I first got into EQing. I have a good number of weird sounding songs to prove it hahaha
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Same thing happened to me about a month ago. Now I only eq shit if I can pinpoint an issue.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Yeah many people overdo it way way way too much. Not everything needs EQ!
Why did you pick those sounds if you're going to just cut out all the power?? Redundant really. Over-EQing is the easiest way to kill a sound, especially something like a nice fat pad.
I tend to only cut where it's absolutely needed. Cutting a kick at 200hz sounds like crazy talk man. 60-80hz maybe, but a gentle roll off not a drastic cut.
Why did you pick those sounds if you're going to just cut out all the power?? Redundant really. Over-EQing is the easiest way to kill a sound, especially something like a nice fat pad.
I tend to only cut where it's absolutely needed. Cutting a kick at 200hz sounds like crazy talk man. 60-80hz maybe, but a gentle roll off not a drastic cut.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
All of these techniques like EQ'ing, compression, sidechaining, filtering etc. are not mandatory and are not set in strict guidelines.
Use them when you feel that they would be a useful tool in that particular situation.
Let your ears dictate what you need to do.
Use them when you feel that they would be a useful tool in that particular situation.
Let your ears dictate what you need to do.
- travis_baker
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:33 am
- Contact:
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
this makes sense at like 80-120hz or so depending on where your subbass sits, for headroom. but a lot of life in a 'real' kick drum is in the 500-1500k range for instance.travis baker wrote:generely i hipass everything
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Ha sounds like what I did when I first got into producing, highpass everything cut the mids and boost the high's to make everything sound clearer, yes it did but I always wondered why my tracks sounded so weak
I never do things by default anymore, if something needs a cut or a high-pass then I'll do it, if not then I let things be

I never do things by default anymore, if something needs a cut or a high-pass then I'll do it, if not then I let things be

Soundcloud
Online Mastering//FAQ//Studio
Evolution Mastering (Analogue/Digital) : 1st track Free sample + 50% off.
What Is Mastering?
http://www.facebook.com/outbounduk
Online Mastering//FAQ//Studio
Evolution Mastering (Analogue/Digital) : 1st track Free sample + 50% off.
What Is Mastering?
http://www.facebook.com/outbounduk
- pete_bubonic
- Posts: 4000
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:06 pm
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
I played a live set in a club recently and after the soundcheck the sound engineer asked me to low cut everything under 35hz(only sub bass riding down round there a couple of times). At first I was like, what's the point, 1. if the speakers can go that low at least people will feel it, 2. if they can't go that low, then no harm done anyway?
Soon as I highpassed it all, everything sounded more punchy , could be pushed louder and we didn't lose any sub. My guess is that although the speakers can't physically go that low, they don't stop from trying, thus muddying the entire sound. It's something I almost always do for studio compositions, but was thinking any club with subs, would handle at least down to there.
Soon as I highpassed it all, everything sounded more punchy , could be pushed louder and we didn't lose any sub. My guess is that although the speakers can't physically go that low, they don't stop from trying, thus muddying the entire sound. It's something I almost always do for studio compositions, but was thinking any club with subs, would handle at least down to there.
I make music as Forsaken, you can DL all my unreleased (and a couple released) bits here.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
yes pete. one of the most important things is lowcutting everything. even the sub (i don't cut the bass though. i leave it to the mastering engeneers when i get it cut).
you gain loooaaads of energy and headroom.
you gain loooaaads of energy and headroom.
forthcoming 12", spring/summer 2015:Legend4ry wrote:Well I am still living in that haze that dubstep is about a dark room with a big system, peoples with their heads down and trigger fingers in the air.
goldplate / war continues
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
You're at a generally acknowledged stage of development.
Eq is a powerful tool though. In my opinion, almost all sounds need eq to a certain extent. Maybe not pure or simple synth sounds. But with most samples, recorded sounds there are elements of the sound that could either be cut or boosted, A BIT. There is the trick - not just locating what sounds bad, or clashes with the rest of the mix, but by how much to attenuate that range.
Also working with a quality eq doesn't hurt, either.
Eq is a powerful tool though. In my opinion, almost all sounds need eq to a certain extent. Maybe not pure or simple synth sounds. But with most samples, recorded sounds there are elements of the sound that could either be cut or boosted, A BIT. There is the trick - not just locating what sounds bad, or clashes with the rest of the mix, but by how much to attenuate that range.
Also working with a quality eq doesn't hurt, either.
- pete_bubonic
- Posts: 4000
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:06 pm
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
yeah I used to leave everything up to the engineer also. It hit me that on headphones or even on my monitors at home, because of positioning, room acoustics, or limited power. I just wasn't picking up on this especially as I always uses loads of sub in my tracks. I should pay more attention and make sure everything in my live sets (things not mastered) have these principles applied.vulvavibration wrote:yes pete. one of the most important things is lowcutting everything. even the sub (i don't cut the bass though. i leave it to the mastering engeneers when i get it cut).
you gain loooaaads of energy and headroom.
I make music as Forsaken, you can DL all my unreleased (and a couple released) bits here.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
I think I had the same issue. I think it's a good way to learn though. Really over the top L/B/H-passing is a good way to see the benefit of putting elements in their own frequency range, and how they fit together, but it's just as lifeless as a cluttered mix.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
I had the same realisation about a week ago, I used to cut my kicks so they wouldnt interfere with the snare,
Then it kinda dawned on me that neither one would be played at the same time
I felt like a right idiot
Then it kinda dawned on me that neither one would be played at the same time
I felt like a right idiot

Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
I'm pretty sure we've all been there, whether we're going to admit it or notMexztah wrote:I had the same realisation about a week ago, I used to cut my kicks so they wouldnt interfere with the snare,
Then it kinda dawned on me that neither one would be played at the same time
I felt like a right idiot

Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Haha, I havent, 'cus I tought about why the fok I'd do it before I did it, rofl.mortiflux wrote:I'm pretty sure we've all been there, whether we're going to admit it or notMexztah wrote:I had the same realisation about a week ago, I used to cut my kicks so they wouldnt interfere with the snare,
Then it kinda dawned on me that neither one would be played at the same time
I felt like a right idiot

Generally, in my tracks, I'll have an EQ on most things, but that's 'cus I really like layering lots of shit at once, and need it.
aka blinkesko
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
I only eq stuff when I feel like it needs it 

Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
Hahaha! I read some thread on here that said to do it.. So I figured I would.Mexztah wrote:I had the same realisation about a week ago, I used to cut my kicks so they wouldnt interfere with the snare,
Then it kinda dawned on me that neither one would be played at the same time
I felt like a right idiot
I've done it a few times, but then I figured it isn't really necessary.. Unless you are going to have the Kick hitting when the Snare hits (Which in my latest track is the case) So I guess it can be useful! But as a guideline, not a rule.
This thread has brought me to the realization that I maybe have been following rules, and cutting when not really needed.. Sometimes I'm just afraid to use my ears because of my shit speakers :/ But oh well, I'll still change my ways a bit.

Also, @AxeD --- I love your Signature for some reason.. O_o
Soundcloud.com/Osciller
Check it out if you want, ;]
Insert Eye-catching Wonderment Here
"It's pronounced Oosilay."
AIM: OscillerProductions@gmail.com
Check it out if you want, ;]
Insert Eye-catching Wonderment Here
"It's pronounced Oosilay."
AIM: OscillerProductions@gmail.com
excision wrote:OMGZ GUYS i made an excision/datsik bass sound today!!!
Re: One huge misconception I had about EQing...
i think i need to listen to this advice - i get so hung up on low pass/high passing everything too much and cutting stuff. and tbh it makes your mix sound weak as fuck if you overdo it!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests