HOLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaShum wrote:wow, that is some post right there.
Missy be puttin' it down
I'm the hottest 'round
I told your mother (ooh!)
ya'll can't stop me now
listen to me now
I'm lasting twenty rounds...
Soundcloud removing remixes?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:28 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
paradigm x wrote:Or stop doing unauthorised remixes and uploading them without permission?bl0rg wrote:im gonna have to stop using soundcloud.

i love this guy
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
it really grinded (ground?) my gears when I was just putting up a mix of clips I sampled from esquivel and al jolson records. Them shits were circa 1959 and soundcloud said no way, EMI or BMG or whoever still owns the rights. Whoever made copyrights renewable is a dingus of the highest order. They shouldn't extend past 40 years, IMO.
edit: does anyone have experience getting past the filters for samples from big labels? I'm not sure how the algorithms work, so can you apply fx to trick it?
edit: does anyone have experience getting past the filters for samples from big labels? I'm not sure how the algorithms work, so can you apply fx to trick it?
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
I actually have had this problem before. I did a remix a while back of Adele's "Rolling in the deep," and got it removed for copyright.
They have an automted system that prevents it. Idk if it has to do with the audio or just the title.
My remix sucked anyways so it doesn't really matter.
They have an automted system that prevents it. Idk if it has to do with the audio or just the title.
My remix sucked anyways so it doesn't really matter.
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
drake89 wrote:it really grinded (ground?) my gears when I was just putting up a mix of clips I sampled from esquivel and al jolson records. Them shits were circa 1959 and soundcloud said no way, EMI or BMG or whoever still owns the rights. Whoever made copyrights renewable is a dingus of the highest order. They shouldn't extend past 40 years, IMO.

Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
You're right, Led Zeppelin I-IV should really be public domain.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
protip: if you're using a free service don't bitch
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
This is a sort of sub question...
How are people still uploading mixes on soundcloud?
I get a copyright claim every time.
its not a big deal, but im curious.
How are people still uploading mixes on soundcloud?
I get a copyright claim every time.
its not a big deal, but im curious.
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
Have you tried providing credits along with the mix? Never had a prob but in the past I put credits and links.
- street_legal
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:37 pm
- Location: WMidlands
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
This.deadly habit wrote:protip: if you're using a free service don't bitch
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
If you own the space your music is hosted on then you can set your own terms & conditions. Soundcloud are just covering their arses to stop their platform from being misused and ultimately removed.
little boh peep wrote:If you take out the "dub", by definition it is no longer dubstep.
moodswing wrote: Imagine an acoustic band on a stage and all of them standing directly in front of each other. I'd love to hear how to eq that.
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
Have fun promotingstreet_legal wrote:This.deadly habit wrote:protip: if you're using a free service don't bitch
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
If you own the space your music is hosted on then you can set your own terms & conditions. Soundcloud are just covering their arses to stop their platform from being misused and ultimately removed.

NEW SONG
Soundcloud
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Soundcloud
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
I did a mix once that got couldn't be uploaded due to copyright,bl0rg wrote:This is a sort of sub question...
How are people still uploading mixes on soundcloud?
I get a copyright claim every time.
its not a big deal, but im curious.
I pitched it up a semi tone and it got through

Obviously this is naughty and you shouldn'd do it

-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:25 pm
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
exactly this.deadly habit wrote:protip: if you're using a free service don't bitch
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
soundcloud is a great service, the best of its type IMO and if they need to take down a few bait remixes to keep their jobs then so be it.
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:25 pm
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
might be because of the previous strike against your account or its just the choice of music in your mixes.bl0rg wrote:This is a sort of sub question...
How are people still uploading mixes on soundcloud?
I get a copyright claim every time.
its not a big deal, but im curious.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
to who? labels and most producers and djs worth a damn communicate via email or services besides soundcloudoutdropt wrote:Have fun promotingstreet_legal wrote:This.deadly habit wrote:protip: if you're using a free service don't bitch
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
If you own the space your music is hosted on then you can set your own terms & conditions. Soundcloud are just covering their arses to stop their platform from being misused and ultimately removed.
if you're just looking for x amount of listens or x amount of random followers then soundcloud is great
otherwise you should be using wayyy more avenues of approach
- street_legal
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:37 pm
- Location: WMidlands
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
Huh?outdropt wrote:Have fun promotingstreet_legal wrote:This.deadly habit wrote:protip: if you're using a free service don't bitch
pony up and buy your own hosting and domain
If you own the space your music is hosted on then you can set your own terms & conditions. Soundcloud are just covering their arses to stop their platform from being misused and ultimately removed.
little boh peep wrote:If you take out the "dub", by definition it is no longer dubstep.
moodswing wrote: Imagine an acoustic band on a stage and all of them standing directly in front of each other. I'd love to hear how to eq that.
- OfficialDAPT
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 am
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
ground not grinded
7 year old BROstep/Trapstep/Chillstep producer from India. Young. Talented. 7 Years Old. Super skilled for age. Signed to NOW22. Biography written in 3rd person on soundcloud OBVI. The next Skrillex. Wait I don't even like him anymore LOL. Super talented. Only 6 years old.
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
Ok to be fair I can agree that extending them through the life of the artist. But there has to be some kind of sanity and balance. I don't care if you're George fucking Gershwin nobody should be getting royalties 80 years after a song was written! IMHO...Attila wrote:You're right, Led Zeppelin I-IV should really be public domain.
After a bit of reading copyright expires 95 years posthumously in US and 70 years in the EU. So the last of The gershwins work enters the public domain in 2032! According to the article I read
Re: Soundcloud removing remixes?
Trible wrote:My remix sucked anyways so it doesn't really matter.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests