I live in a small town in Canada so to keep up with interesting electronic music I have to use the internet. Do you think it's important to be part of a local music scene to keep yourself artistically inspired/challenged?
Thanks!

i don't often hard-pan and find it a bit extreme... but never say never etc. lots of that in old acid recordings, although cutting to vinyl narrows the stereo image in the end.zerbaman wrote:for the 1000th time, thanks for doing this, I don't think I've ever been as pleasantly surprised to drop into the Production forum as I was when I logged in today.
Hoping I'm not too late![]()
1 -Would panning on hat elements be real soft-pan? Or virtually all the way hard-panning?almost everything is dead centre. there's quite a lot of stereo content, but this is usually through layering an instrument and panning the layers left and right (e.g. a 606 hat with an 808 hat). sometimes i will automate the pan for creative purposes, but in a more functional mixdown sense i prefer to think in terms of "mid-sides" than "left-right".
Does it differ in pursuit of particular effects? What would you say the effect(s) may be?
well, if you spend 2 months listening to only one track then you're gonna grow to hate it much faster than if you've got a few things on your plate. it's nice to be able to take a step back and work on something else for a while.zerbaman wrote:
2 -Care to elaborate? - This isn't really important, I'd just like to know more about your productive ethic, so to speak, like a fly on the wall of your apartment.also, see my answer above - in the end i found that working on one track at a time is generally very bad for creative blocks
i prefer to fix the problem at the source, e.g. make sure my sub and kick are mono, than fix the mastering bus with a "mono under 100hz" plugin or whatever. a mastering engineer is only gonna do that for you anyway if the track really needs it.zerbaman wrote:
3 -I've personally always gone mono from 200hz downwards. This may be a slightly sappy question, but is that good? Would it be better to go lower?good mixdown practice is good mixdown practice. the only specific vinyl no-no i can think of is heavy "side" content in the bass, since vinyl is cut in such a way that the mono content makes the needle oscillate laterally (left-right) and the stereo content makes the needle oscillate vertically, so lots of stereo content in the low end can make the needle jump out of the groove or the cutting stylus "bottom out" into the aluminium base of the master lacquer. but this is actually not bad advice for digital mixdowns either, since club soundsystems are often limited by the power of their subs, and making sure your low end is mono-only can maximise the amount of low end power you get out of a crappy system (think about it like this - if you pan something hard left then you have to boost it by 6dB to get the same volume out of it, and that might trigger the limiter earlier than if it were in mono). same applies to a heavily limited radio mix (if your track is destined for the radio).
I'm pretty ignorant with regard to sound control/manipulation.
yes, i had a P&D deal, so the distributor paid for the costs, which isn't that common these days. they also did all of the promo, which is even less common these days, but the "promo" basically amounted to jackmaster sending it to a bunch of his mates on AIM and making sure boomkat got it first. frankly that worked better than any press release i've ever read.zerbaman wrote:
5 - I'd like to ask about the Objekt#1 & 2, 1 in particular I suppose. I understand from interviews that you arranged distribution (for some reason, I believe it was at the distributor's expense? correct me if I'm wrong of course). Did you do any further promo of it? Was it just sending to the right people at the right radio stations from here? I caught on to you fairly late so I didn't really witness your asent.
objekt #1 was my first release.zerbaman wrote:
On a related point, did you have any releases before hand? As static cast or TJ perhaps? (I understood that you taking on the name Objekt was accidental).
Did you 'know' #1 would become what it was when you were originally approached with the idea to release? How did it feel (obviously good, did you feel pressured about that all eyes on you kind of thing?)
"pop tune" was a facetious way of putting it in an interview, but it was originally 3 minutes long, yeah. it was for the DSF samplepack competition. i think it's still on soundcloud somewhere on the competition page, along with the samplepack. otherwise email me and i'll send it over.zerbaman wrote:
6 - I think I read somewhere that the goose started as an attempt to make some kind of pop tune? Would it be completely outrageous to request some audio of the first project file?
i've been working on some stuff with a friend, yeah. nothing finished yet though. i wouldn't really want to say any more for now.zerbaman wrote:
7 - I obviously wouldn't ask for specifics (names etc), but have you been working collaboratively with other musicians in the scene? Even a remote prospect of something coming out? Who would you be interested in working with, why?
i'm the most self-critical person i know. objekt #1 was the first track i was satisfied enough with to release (and only after some persuasion) and that took me about 5 years of learning how to make electronic music, not counting several years of learning how to use a DAW and do a mixdown before that.zerbaman wrote:
8 - Do you find yourself consistently satisfied with your productions? Are you more of a self-critical type? How long do you think it took for you to develop some consistency with your productions?
where were they mastered? what was wrong with them?glottis5 wrote:A lot of times when I get my tunes mastered, they end up sounding worse (in my opinion). What should I know when I send a tune out for mastering? Or is there a chance that I've just gotten a couple of bad engineers?
for me yes, to a degree. for others not (or completely). it's a personal thing!glottis5 wrote:I live in a small town in Canada so to keep up with interesting electronic music I have to use the internet. Do you think it's important to be part of a local music scene to keep yourself artistically inspired/challenged?
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
epochalypso wrote:Last vinyl purchase! (?)
np! hope it's been of helpNaan Bread wrote:Thanks very much for doing this firstly.
totally. i think there is room in any genre for fairly generic fodder, and that such generic fodder isn't necessarily a bad thing to make; "someone" needs to make it after all (lengthy rants about shit tech-house notwithstanding). but to actually make stuff that sounds exactly like a specific producer is, to me, kind of pointless. emulation is one thing - you will usually still sound like yourself - cloning is another. occasionally i'll set out to make a track that sounds like 'x' producer, and end up doing exactly that, only to discard the track because i'd look silly releasing it.Naan Bread wrote:What are your thoughts on originality in music? You've mentioned that your process of building tracks is very natural and organic but do you ever stop and think, "shit, this sounds to much like X producer"?
i would say both. the two don't have to mutually exclusive. all music is arguably art anyway. there's plenty of shit art about.Naan Bread wrote:Do you consider your music as art or as functional dance music? Do you make a distinction between the two?
ummm. i'm really bad at questions like this, but here's five rather obvious picks from the list i gave RBMA earlier this year. these obviously take into account nostalgia etc...Naan Bread wrote:Can we get a top 5 albums and/or eps?
i tried to but he spent the whole time tweetingNaan Bread wrote:Are you collaborating with Helix?
what zerbaman saidMinzo wrote:I got one question though. I'm a bit new to producing music and I would like to know, do you make your own samples or what sample pack(s) you guys would reccomend to use?
i don't have a template for the DAW itself, but i make sure i save my most commonly used settings as the default preset for all the FX i use regularly... saves a lot of time with compressors and delays for example if i only have to move one parameter instead of seven. i've also got a few of my commonly used channel strips saved and ready to go - pre-compressed and EQed 606 hats, monosynths, kits, sidechain trigger, etc. basically, any time you notice yourself re-using a certain basic patch, save it.Nite Life wrote:Its really cool that you can still talk with forum peons like myself even after success! XD
I was wondering if you a default template for starting new tunes. Like you, I work a day job and when I get home I only have 2-3 good hours to get the creative juices flowing. I tend to start with drums, but creating drum kits I actually like, eq-ing, compressing, etc all take lots of time...And sometimes I finally get a loop going only to have it sound like shit - back at square one. I figure a template may help, but I don't want to spend hours making one only to have it limit creativity even more. Thoughts?
dude I just had nothing to contribute at all, you're so much better than mestatic_cast wrote:i tried to but he spent the whole time tweetingNaan Bread wrote:Are you collaborating with Helix?
uh... i don't follow. i just load up a compressor and set the sidechain input to whatever i want?goodeh wrote:what is preffered method of sidechaining? anychance you upload the instrument rack? (providing you're only using Abletons stock plugins)
for any ableton users;
here are some links to a couple of devices i've made recently.
A mid/side eq/ analyser
http://www.mediafire.com/?occ2gh98g29q8rh
and a channel spitter (for isolating left channel and right channel)
http://www.mediafire.com/?wv9fz2hjfzr14rv
pfffff. you can make tool techno, which is more than i ever managedHelix [Delay] wrote:dude I just had nothing to contribute at all, you're so much better than mestatic_cast wrote:i tried to but he spent the whole time tweetingNaan Bread wrote:Are you collaborating with Helix?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
in a previous post u mentioned you have devices you use a lot including a sidechain trigger. i wasn't sure if you were using another way of sidechaining, as opposed to the standard way of doin itstatic_cast wrote:uh... i don't follow. i just load up a compressor and set the sidechain input to whatever i want?
oh, that - i mentioned that in a previous post. someone asked for a "random production tip" and i explained how to set up a sidechain trigger channel that follows the kick. it's a few pages back i think.goodeh wrote:in a previous post u mentioned you have devices you use a lot including a sidechain trigger. i wasn't sure if you were using another way of sidechaining, as opposed to the standard way of doin itstatic_cast wrote:uh... i don't follow. i just load up a compressor and set the sidechain input to whatever i want?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests