Can Dubstep be popular without Massive?

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
Locked
User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: Can Dubstep be popular without Massive?

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:50 am

complextro
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com
Top
exfox
Posts: 2490
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: Can Dubstep be popular without Massive?

Post by exfox » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:58 am

a better question is: can Dubstep be popular without DUBTURBO?
Top
User avatar
1point5
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:15 pm
Location: UK
Contact:
Contact 1point5

Re: Can Dubstep be popular without Massive?

Post by 1point5 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:40 pm

Lye Form wrote:
1point5 wrote: 99% of the time massive sounds like shit anyway
99% of the time dubstep sounds like shit anyway.

Massive is a decent synth that you can do a lot with - most of james blakes album is with massive (& a prophet 08)

It sounds plasticy raw but if you process/mix it well its as good as you make it.
Completely agree, there's nothing wrong with massive itself, but plasticky is definitely the word for the sounds most people get out of it
http://www.facebook.com/1point5
http://soundcloud.com/1point5
1point5 - Void (Rinse FM Rip) - Chip Butty Records
Soundcloud
Top
Locked

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests