The Official Growl Bass Thread

neonmansion
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:26 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by neonmansion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:07 am

hey guys, i put some growls in the latest track i've been working on and i think they came out quite good. (little muddy though)

it comes in at about 1:00

Soundcloud

User avatar
mromgwtf
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 1:06 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mromgwtf » Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:30 am

mthrfnk wrote:Just a quick edit: personally this is the reason I like a lot of Knife Party's midrange/bass work because it sounds good, fits the genre, but doesn't sound overly similar to other stuff (at least not intentionally). One of the reasons for this I think is because they use other synths outside of Massive/FM8 - for example the basses in Bonfire were made in Sylenth and according to Rob Swire really weren't hat hard to make.
Knife Party uses massive a lot in their tracks I think?
Exilium wrote:distorted square

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mthrfnk » Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:04 am

mromgwtf wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:Just a quick edit: personally this is the reason I like a lot of Knife Party's midrange/bass work because it sounds good, fits the genre, but doesn't sound overly similar to other stuff (at least not intentionally). One of the reasons for this I think is because they use other synths outside of Massive/FM8 - for example the basses in Bonfire were made in Sylenth and according to Rob Swire really weren't hat hard to make.
Knife Party uses massive a lot in their tracks I think?
They do use it but use other synths as well... and they don't rinse the same sounds as everyone else (i.e. modern talking...)
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
mromgwtf
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 1:06 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mromgwtf » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:45 pm

mthrfnk wrote:as everyone else (i.e. modern talking...)
Oh cmon, no one really uses modern talking.
Exilium wrote:distorted square

Maxxan
Posts: 540
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by Maxxan » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:47 pm

mromgwtf wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:as everyone else (i.e. modern talking...)
Oh cmon, no one really uses modern talking.
Actually this guy built an entire career on it

Hircine wrote:dsf is like bane: throws you into a pit and if you are able to crawl out of it on your own, you are good enough for the forum.
Soundcloud

Freshest track atm.

User avatar
Sure_Fire
Posts: 404
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:57 am
Location: Australia

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by Sure_Fire » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:51 pm

neonmansion wrote:hey guys, i put some growls in the latest track i've been working on and i think they came out quite good. (little muddy though)

it comes in at about 1:00

Soundcloud
Obvious Skrillex sampling is obvious
Soundcloud
Video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll - Shigeru Miyamoto
https://soundcloud.com/photonman

Kit Fysto
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:31 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by Kit Fysto » Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:59 pm

mromgwtf wrote:Unless you're a genius with 10+ years experience with synthesis, don't use fm8. FM synthesis is fucking hard. In specification, massive is a subtractive synth. But in reality, no it isn't. It has many different knobs that create fm effect, + almost each wavetable in massive is a little fm8 patch. The PHASE option in modulation osc does phase modulation, which is almost the same as the so-called frequency modulation. FM8 uses phase modulation, not frequency modulation. The sine shaper does little phase modulation too.

You can create such awesome complex fm-like basses in massive in MINUTES, you'd have to spent hours to get the same growls in fm8. If you're going to use fm8, you should know, you won't create a nice bass with a one instance of it. You have to layer 2 of them at least. It's like creating a complex bass in massive with one wavetable. I've made a kinda cool bass in massive I'd like to show you:

Soundcloud

It's not that great, but whatever. Soundcloud compression fucks it up a little bit.
The whole sounds comes from sine shaper, actually. Without it, the bass sounds like nothing, automating the drive in sine shaper gives you a lot of movoment, it's fm-ing the sound. Notch filters are cool too. ;)
This is actually horrible advice and such a self defeating attitude to have. I could write a wall of text of reasons why, but I think it's pretty obvious that the desire to learn new techniques as a producer should be something you naturally desire. Also, 10+ years? seriously. It's not THAT hard of a concept to grasp. You can learn to be a godamn doctor in less than 10 years haha.
Soundcloud
New EP Trailer ^

neonmansion
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:26 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by neonmansion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:24 pm

Sure_Fire wrote:
neonmansion wrote:hey guys, i put some growls in the latest track i've been working on and i think they came out quite good. (little muddy though)

it comes in at about 1:00

Soundcloud
Obvious Skrillex sampling is obvious
i'm flattered that you think they sound that good but I ASSURE you that I made that. Perhaps you could point to the particular song a sampled if you are so observant?

User avatar
mromgwtf
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 1:06 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mromgwtf » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:28 pm

Kit Fysto wrote:
mromgwtf wrote:Unless you're a genius with 10+ years experience with synthesis, don't use fm8. FM synthesis is fucking hard. In specification, massive is a subtractive synth. But in reality, no it isn't. It has many different knobs that create fm effect, + almost each wavetable in massive is a little fm8 patch. The PHASE option in modulation osc does phase modulation, which is almost the same as the so-called frequency modulation. FM8 uses phase modulation, not frequency modulation. The sine shaper does little phase modulation too.

You can create such awesome complex fm-like basses in massive in MINUTES, you'd have to spent hours to get the same growls in fm8. If you're going to use fm8, you should know, you won't create a nice bass with a one instance of it. You have to layer 2 of them at least. It's like creating a complex bass in massive with one wavetable. I've made a kinda cool bass in massive I'd like to show you:

Soundcloud

It's not that great, but whatever. Soundcloud compression fucks it up a little bit.
The whole sounds comes from sine shaper, actually. Without it, the bass sounds like nothing, automating the drive in sine shaper gives you a lot of movoment, it's fm-ing the sound. Notch filters are cool too. ;)
This is actually horrible advice and such a self defeating attitude to have. I could write a wall of text of reasons why, but I think it's pretty obvious that the desire to learn new techniques as a producer should be something you naturally desire. Also, 10+ years? seriously. It's not THAT hard of a concept to grasp. You can learn to be a godamn doctor in less than 10 years haha.
Don't take the 10 years seriously. I meant, unless you've mastered simplier forms of synthesis, don't get into fm synthesis. The fm synthesis is so... unsuspectable, you can't tell what sound you will end up with. I've been spending a lot of time with fm8 recently, I've made only ONE nice, harmonically rich growl bass. Why? It was accident. I was just playing with operator routings, and it was just luck I've got the good sound. Seriously, there is no any "recipe" how to make a sound in fm synthesis, what routings you should have as a base, to make it sound nice. Well I hope you can get me right.
Maxxan wrote:
mromgwtf wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:as everyone else (i.e. modern talking...)
Oh cmon, no one really uses modern talking.
Actually this guy built an entire career on it

When the drop came... I've burst into tears...
Exilium wrote:distorted square

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mthrfnk » Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:23 pm

mromgwtf wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:as everyone else (i.e. modern talking...)
Oh cmon, no one really uses modern talking.
Pretty much every other "bro" track I hear I'm sure contains MT basses, even house artists are using it now...
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Kit Fysto
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:31 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by Kit Fysto » Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:02 pm

mthrfnk wrote:
mromgwtf wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:as everyone else (i.e. modern talking...)
Oh cmon, no one really uses modern talking.
Pretty much every other "bro" track I hear I'm sure contains MT basses, even house artists are using it now...

I actually hear it on random electro tracks on electric area (satellite radio) more than anything now.
Soundcloud
New EP Trailer ^

IamDroid
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:12 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by IamDroid » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:08 pm

MT is for noobs. Only beginners use it. I hate seeing people just use one instance of it in tutorials and just modulate wt pos/ intensity and claim "oh this is the best skrillex/growl bass on YouTube" what a bunch of horse shit. As a producer, you should always strive to find a more creative no commercial way to make unique sounds. Not this generic ass formula all these noobs use. Pisses me off so much. You can make filthy ass sounds using another other wavetable if you modulate it right. So why use MT.. da fuck?

neonmansion
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:26 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by neonmansion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:28 pm

what is MT? aand i'm still mad at the dude who claimed i sampled skrillex. I used fm8 filters and distortion

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mthrfnk » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:42 pm

MT - modern talking wavetable in Massive.

Don't use it hah
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

twilitez
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:04 am

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by twilitez » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:04 pm

You are really overthinking FM in a big way. For one, you can make bass with 2 operators. You could probably make a cooler one using 6 and a ton of FX internally and externally, but you dont NEED to do that. Ten years even if just a metaphor is nonsense.

Maxxan
Posts: 540
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by Maxxan » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:05 pm

mromgwtf wrote:
When the drop came... I've burst into tears...
Yeah it's... I, uh... Yeah. It makes me want to kill myself.
Hircine wrote:dsf is like bane: throws you into a pit and if you are able to crawl out of it on your own, you are good enough for the forum.
Soundcloud

Freshest track atm.

User avatar
ephyks
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:53 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by ephyks » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:23 pm

Kit Fysto wrote:Made this today with FM8 and figured I would post it cause it came out kind of cool I think
Soundcloud
Dope. Mind tossin' a bit of your knowledge down? Would like to know how ya got this.
Coolschmid wrote:Just buy as many $200 synths as possible so you can be bad at all of them.
Soundcloud

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mthrfnk » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:26 pm

What amuses me is that Knife Party made their first EP "100% no modern talking" and constantly tweet about how shit MT based bass tracks are.... yet they used to rinse that Tolouse track in their mixes/live sets. Just goes to show, if the general public likes it - it doesn't matter how you make a track or even if other producers like it.
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
ephyks
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:53 pm

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by ephyks » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:46 pm

Not sure if anyone else feels the same, but Modern Talking is possibly the shittiest wave form for growls. Not because it's overused, simply because you can get a tighter vocal sound from literally any other waveform, and a bandreject.
A modern talking osc pitched down to -12 just sounds like muck. Not sure if anyone has ever actually made a good growl with modern talking. I'd say the culprit for overused growls is the WOW filters vocal filter.
Coolschmid wrote:Just buy as many $200 synths as possible so you can be bad at all of them.
Soundcloud

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Official Growl Bass Thread

Post by mthrfnk » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:55 pm

ephyks wrote:Not sure if anyone else feels the same, but Modern Talking is possibly the shittiest wave form for growls. Not because it's overused, simply because you can get a tighter vocal sound from literally any other waveform, and a bandreject.
A modern talking osc pitched down to -12 just sounds like muck. Not sure if anyone has ever actually made a good growl with modern talking. I'd say the culprit for overused growls is the WOW filters vocal filter.
WOW is good if used right.

I keep seeing people just slap it on in tutorials, without any thought. They'll have standard vowels (O > I), and LFO automating like 1/4, a shit ton of resonance and a high wet % which makes it so obvious because it actually kills a lot of the original sound. If you use it right and in moderation, it really can sound great.
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests