Cover of Burial Archangel

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
skunktech
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:24 am

Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by skunktech » Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:55 pm

Really good!

She's amazing.


User avatar
Figment
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Figment » Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:22 pm

it's good it isn't cringeworthy.. i don't really feel it though, reckon a slower tempo to really bring through the emotion in the performance could make this something serious, something just doesn't seem right with this.. it might literally be that the original is a masterpiece.
incnic wrote:eat bass u r a wanker m8 lol
fuk off with ur shite prolems cos im trying to classofy dungeon vs classic dubstep ffs
Giving away some remixes:
Soundcloud

nameless133
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:00 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by nameless133 » Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:32 pm

I thinik it's a very annoying cover. Vocals are not suits to song.

User avatar
topmo3
Posts: 4657
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:14 am
Location: Finland

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by topmo3 » Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:57 pm

it's fucking useless, why would you try to vocally cover a track with not actual lyrics but mangled vocal snippets, it doesn't make sense. also wtf is up with the panning going left to right all the time. wouldn't either recognize the track without the vocals so where are those chords coming from
Image

MrReplay
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:36 am

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by MrReplay » Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:01 pm

This is amazing, thank you

wwwmoo
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:17 am

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by wwwmoo » Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:01 pm

This girl thinks she is way better at singing than she actually is. This is terrible, 1 shitty take and then loop it for five minutes?

Gaufre
Posts: 319
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:12 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Gaufre » Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:33 pm

wwwmoo wrote:This girl thinks she is way better at singing than she actually is. This is terrible, 1 shitty take and then loop it for five minutes?
]

User avatar
dickman69
Posts: 14517
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:58 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by dickman69 » Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:42 pm

Image
every Tuesday 11pm EST on http://cosmicsound.club

buy my tunes pls
Soundcloud

orangeman
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by orangeman » Fri Dec 07, 2012 11:48 pm

The panning could be a little more subtle... but overall, I love it.

joeki
Posts: 3265
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:32 pm
Location: Hest Side, Belgium

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by joeki » Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:23 pm

gerbege.

User avatar
1point5
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:15 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by 1point5 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:30 pm

Think I prefer it to the original, but probably because I really hate the way Burial uses vocals. I'm not much of a burial fan but I think I maybe could be if he made more instrumental stuff.

The vocal panning in this is really annoying though
http://www.facebook.com/1point5
http://soundcloud.com/1point5
1point5 - Void (Rinse FM Rip) - Chip Butty Records
Soundcloud

Lichee
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:58 am

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Lichee » Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:51 am

1point5 wrote:Think I prefer it to the original, but probably because I really hate the way Burial uses vocals. I'm not much of a burial fan but I think I maybe could be if he made more instrumental stuff.

The vocal panning in this is really annoying though
Image

User avatar
topmo3
Posts: 4657
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:14 am
Location: Finland

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by topmo3 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:27 pm

^ indeed, what the actual fuck.
Image

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Lye_Form » Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:29 pm

1point5 wrote:Think I prefer it to the original, but probably because I really hate the way Burial uses vocals. I'm not much of a burial fan but I think I maybe could be if he made more instrumental stuff.
Unpopular opinions thread plz
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

User avatar
1point5
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:15 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by 1point5 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:14 pm

Lye Form wrote:
1point5 wrote:Think I prefer it to the original, but probably because I really hate the way Burial uses vocals. I'm not much of a burial fan but I think I maybe could be if he made more instrumental stuff.
Unpopular opinions thread plz
Pretty sure the subject has been well covered there :lol:

I'm definitely not alone on this forum thinking that Burial is overrated
http://www.facebook.com/1point5
http://soundcloud.com/1point5
1point5 - Void (Rinse FM Rip) - Chip Butty Records
Soundcloud

Lichee
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:58 am

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Lichee » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:17 pm

The thing is it's all opinion.

Apart from saying Burial is overrated/not good that's incorrect you can't say that.

User avatar
1point5
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:15 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by 1point5 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:39 pm

Lichee wrote:The thing is it's all opinion.

Apart from saying Burial is overrated/not good that's incorrect you can't say that.
wut

Of course it's my opinion, what else would it be?

Anyway, to elaborate, I generally find that Burial's vocal samples usually sound like they've been haphazardly slapped on and end up being pretty non-cohesive with the rest of the track - but not in an interesting and experimental way, it just sounds like lazy unthoughtful production to me. I think this song works better and makes much more sense to me with a live vocalist.
http://www.facebook.com/1point5
http://soundcloud.com/1point5
1point5 - Void (Rinse FM Rip) - Chip Butty Records
Soundcloud

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Lye_Form » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:08 pm

1point5 wrote: I generally find that Burial's vocal samples usually sound like they've been haphazardly slapped on and end up being pretty non-cohesive with the rest of the track
I feel the complete opposite of this.

But as you said it's all opinion.
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

Anjin
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:11 pm

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Anjin » Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:26 pm

I like the idea, think it could be more developed. It sounds okay though.

Lichee
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:58 am

Re: Cover of Burial Archangel

Post by Lichee » Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:46 pm

1point5 wrote:
Lichee wrote:The thing is it's all opinion.

Apart from saying Burial is overrated/not good that's incorrect you can't say that.
wut

Of course it's my opinion, what else would it be?

Anyway, to elaborate, I generally find that Burial's vocal samples usually sound like they've been haphazardly slapped on and end up being pretty non-cohesive with the rest of the track - but not in an interesting and experimental way, it just sounds like lazy unthoughtful production to me. I think this song works better and makes much more sense to me with a live vocalist.
i'm kidding of course it's all opinion, it's just for me I consider Burial being great closer to fact than opinion, it's either you like Burial, or you haven't listened to him properly.

"this song works better and makes much more sense to me with a live vocalist" - the beauty of Burials vocals is the short clips, pitching and repetition, it means it never sounds like a vocalist, you don't know who's singing it, if it's male or female, a girl or a woman or where the vocals came from. They sort of support the entire track, the tune doesn't become about a singer.

Burial's production is definitely not lazy and unthoughtful, i'm not sure we're listening to the same music here.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests