debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
-
spooKs
- Posts: 5857
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: Bristol & West Wales
-
Contact:
Post
by spooKs » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:41 pm
-
misk
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:40 am
- Location: East Coast Soon!
-
Contact:
Post
by misk » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:46 pm
heh.
-
skipple
- Posts: 961
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:49 am
- Location: LDN-SW4
-
Contact:
Post
by skipple » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:47 pm
shameless
first Mr. Manuva then this
-
weston
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:21 am
- Location: west
Post
by weston » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:50 pm
bagged

-
showguns
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: los angeles, ca
Post
by showguns » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:22 pm
is this a repress?

"Sometimes I do see people saggin, with dirty underwear, and it is indeed a sad thing."
-
bagelator
- Posts: 2348
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 6:25 pm
- Location: Peli Sulla Lingua
Post
by bagelator » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:24 pm
better than the original

-
ddk
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:29 pm
Post
by ddk » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:30 pm
why do breaks producers insist on using terms like "funky" and "bootylicious" to describe their music..
-
misk
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:40 am
- Location: East Coast Soon!
-
Contact:
Post
by misk » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:07 pm
i dont sample other producers, but we all sample. so we're all fair game as far as im concerned. not a very good tune tho

-
prisoner
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: MPLS
Post
by prisoner » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:14 pm
w t f
that's fucking awful.

-
reso
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:47 pm
- Location: ENFORR
Post
by reso » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:18 pm
That was obviously made by this cheeky chappy:

-
batfink
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 12:13 pm
Post
by batfink » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:19 pm
reso wrote:That was obviously made by this cheeky chappy:

how long does he spend on his tunes?

is it?
NO.
-
entheogen
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:40 am
Post
by entheogen » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:45 pm
daddek wrote:why do breaks producers insist on using terms like "funky" and "bootylicious" to describe their music..
For the same reason I've heard dubstep crew using words like shizzle and bizzle?
-
pk-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
- Location: SE15
-
Contact:
Post
by pk- » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:53 pm
i have never heard anyone say shizzle or bizzle
-
kins83
- Posts: 5979
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
- Location: Leeds
Post
by kins83 » Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:55 pm
Entheogen wrote:daddek wrote:why do breaks producers insist on using terms like "funky" and "bootylicious" to describe their music..
For the same reason I've heard dubstep crew using words like shizzle and bizzle?
touche
-
barclay james
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:37 am
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by barclay james » Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:01 pm
DON'T STOP!!
theres gunna be some bait heads somewhere loving this!! lol..
barclayjames.net
standardplace.net
swamp81.com
-
ddk
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:29 pm
Post
by ddk » Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:38 pm
Entheogen wrote:daddek wrote:why do breaks producers insist on using terms like "funky" and "bootylicious" to describe their music..
For the same reason I've heard dubstep crew using words like shizzle and bizzle?
my point: breaks people relentlessly promote their shit as "funktastic booty shaking, block rocking etc".. when their beats are as rhythmically stiff, flat and wooden as a fucking plank. of wood.
dubstep / grime people might say odd things like "bizzle" now and again, but at least there's no blatant factual inaccuracy involved in that
-
quietmouse
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:19 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by quietmouse » Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:25 pm
hahaha wow i really hate this tune. although the way they used the sample is kinda cool...
-
badger
- Posts: 13776
- Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by badger » Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:32 pm
Quietmouse wrote:hahaha wow i really hate this tune. although the way they used the sample is kinda cool...
heh i thought the same. sample isnt that badly used but the track sounds pretty terrible and the vocal is wank
-
dubstepper
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:38 pm
- Location: London
Post
by dubstepper » Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:17 pm
reso wrote:That was obviously made by this cheeky chappy:

Hahahahahaha. Ye i think your right m8.. tune is pure swag
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests