[POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
					Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
	By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- JorgyTheGreat
 - Posts: 20
 - Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:39 pm
 - Location: Cleveland, OH
 - Contact:
 
Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...
Both have their uses.
			
			
									
									
						- JorgyTheGreat
 - Posts: 20
 - Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:39 pm
 - Location: Cleveland, OH
 - Contact:
 
Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...
I know but some people have their preferences to use one over the other and that's the basis of this post.
			
			
									
									
						Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...
I am aware of that, and was replying with my opinion on the matter.
You could always incorporate a poll in the OP to find out people's choice?
			
			
									
									
						You could always incorporate a poll in the OP to find out people's choice?
- JorgyTheGreat
 - Posts: 20
 - Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:39 pm
 - Location: Cleveland, OH
 - Contact:
 
Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...
Ohh. I gotcha. Sorry I didn't catch that. I wasn't sure on how to do that but I see that one was made.
			
			
									
									
						Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
This is like asking beer or wine. I like both for different reasons.
			
			
									
									Soundcloud
New EP Trailer ^
						New EP Trailer ^
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
Parallel on drums, serial on errr ting else.
			
			
									
									
						Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
JFK wrote:Parallel on drums, serial on errr ting else.
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
			
			
									
									
namsayin
:'0
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
he means just putting it directly in the chain on the channel your working with.Genevieve wrote:Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
yea.Genevieve wrote:Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
use the first one to tame the peaks, then send the signal into the second one which is most likely one that has a nice character but would start pumping if you didn't catch the peaks with the first one.
well then he's using the wrong wordsbassinine wrote: he means just putting it directly in the chain on the channel your working with.
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
Yeah, but you all are right. It's basically parallel compression on one channel. Light into heavy comp.hasezwei wrote:yea.Genevieve wrote:Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
use the first one to tame the peaks, then send the signal into the second one which is most likely one that has a nice character but would start pumping if you didn't catch the peaks with the first one.
well then he's using the wrong wordsbassinine wrote: he means just putting it directly in the chain on the channel your working with.
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
question: if i had a compressor with a dry/wet knob on it...and i pulled the knob to about 50% or whatever. would that now be parallel compression ?
			
			
									
									
						- OfficialDAPT
 - Posts: 1477
 - Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 am
 
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
Technically, I think so, but I tend to think of parallel as 100% dry with extra compressed signal running along side (parallel) of the dry. It's purpose is to retain some dynamics of the original sound but also make it more full or fat.shakas wrote:question: if i had a compressor with a dry/wet knob on it...and i pulled the knob to about 50% or whatever. would that now be parallel compression ?
7 year old BROstep/Trapstep/Chillstep producer from India.  Young. Talented. 7 Years Old. Super skilled for  age.  Signed to NOW22.  Biography written in 3rd person on soundcloud OBVI.  The next Skrillex.  Wait I don't even like him anymore LOL.  Super talented. Only 6 years old.
						Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
i mean, yeah, that would be parallel. unless the compressor processes the dry signal is some way... some compressors will color the sound a bit if i'm not mistaken.OfficialDAPT wrote:Technically, I think so, but I tend to think of parallel as 100% dry with extra compressed signal running along side (parallel) of the dry. It's purpose is to retain some dynamics of the original sound but also make it more full or fat.shakas wrote:question: if i had a compressor with a dry/wet knob on it...and i pulled the knob to about 50% or whatever. would that now be parallel compression ?
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
the benefit of setting up a separate channel for parallel compression would be that you're able to process the dry and wet signal differently, with an eq for example
			
			
									
									
						Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
JFK wrote:Parallel on drums, serial on errr ting else.
Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...
1176 into la2a 
			
			
									
									
						Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests