Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
Benedict
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:26 am
Location: Shrewsbury UK
Contact:

Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by Benedict » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:52 pm

Whaddup Wider Community,

Has anyone actually created ANYTHING good with Cyclop?

I'm a complete and total newbie to dubstep production; I'm playing around with a demo version of Cyclop right now.. and we all know that dubstep doesn't actually use wobbles any more, right?

Cyclop feels like a bit of a "Casio home keyboard" of dubstep

Is Cyclop worth spending any more time with, or am I being naive? Are there any Cyclop champions out there?

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by mthrfnk » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:55 pm

From what I've seen it looks a little shit tbf. Learning other, more versatile synths is a better option imo.
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
ill mindset
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:11 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by ill mindset » Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:31 am

its got a couple thick sounding basses but its pretty lame in general. Interface is a gimmick. I wouldn't buy it

neonmansion
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:26 am

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by neonmansion » Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:40 am

i like the fact that you can play tetriss!!! way essential imo

i have to play tetris on an Mul4t3r atm

when i get my cas3h ^ i am SO going to purchase for that feature

User avatar
3rdeye
Posts: 1720
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:22 am
Location: Byron Bay 2481

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by 3rdeye » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:15 pm

Sugarbytes wrote:Synthesis in its purest form
Are these guys taking the piss? Have they been focusing on the SNH for market research?

:lol:
Subtitles | Area Recordings | Muti Music | Requiem Audio | Subway | Gradient Audio
http://www.soundcloud.com/3rdeye

Blingley
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:36 pm

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by Blingley » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:51 pm

A horrible gimmick tool that doesn't even do what advertized. Almost certainly an exercise in trolling by Sugarbytes' part.
Image

User avatar
sunny_b_uk
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:48 am
Location: Wolverhampton

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by sunny_b_uk » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:56 pm

dont use it, it seriously doesnt sound clear at all, very nasty sounding synth. its the worst plugin iv ever used.

User avatar
Kongret
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:34 am

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by Kongret » Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:00 pm

Very disappointing synth indeed.

User avatar
Dustwyrm
Posts: 422
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:22 am
Location: Murrieta, Ca
Contact:

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by Dustwyrm » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:48 pm

Benedict wrote: and we all know that dubstep doesn't actually use wobbles any more, right?
This is the second time you've said this statement. I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or serious.

Maybe you're confusing "wobbles" with what the actually are. In this case, LFO's are extremely alive and still being used for all kinds of music production. Just because a bass isn't 'wobbling' doesn't mean that LFOs aren't being used. I know sometimes I'm confusing but this quote you've stated, I don't understand.
︻╦╤─ Dus†wyrm ─╤╦︻

Soundcloud

"The wobble is there more as a reminder that we are still in Dubstep territory, but right now we are chilling... " - Emm

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by mthrfnk » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:31 pm

Dustwyrm wrote:
Benedict wrote: and we all know that dubstep doesn't actually use wobbles any more, right?
This is the second time you've said this statement. I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or serious.

Maybe you're confusing "wobbles" with what the actually are. In this case, LFO's are extremely alive and still being used for all kinds of music production. Just because a bass isn't 'wobbling' doesn't mean that LFOs aren't being used. I know sometimes I'm confusing but this quote you've stated, I don't understand.
He probably means like Skream 2005 bass wobbles vs. Skrillex 2013 wubwubyoi wobbles. :dunce:
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

123kidd
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:58 am
Location: Tdot

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by 123kidd » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:59 pm

Just took a look at it and seems very limiting. Im getting tired these companies jumping on the bandwagon and creating very mediocre products as a result. Dont get me wrong though sugarbytes is an amazing company with great products.

User avatar
fuz
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 3:15 pm
Location: Paris 17th, France
Contact:

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by fuz » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:18 am

It's heavy as shit, and very weird workflow. I just use it for granular thing (vocoding abuse). FM8 can do similar stuffs, but colder and noisier.

User avatar
Benedict
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:26 am
Location: Shrewsbury UK
Contact:

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by Benedict » Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:00 pm

Dustwyrm wrote:
Benedict wrote: and we all know that dubstep doesn't actually use wobbles any more, right?
This is the second time you've said this statement. I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or serious.
Perhaps it's a theory which I'm popularizing based on my own observations :4:

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by VirtualMark » Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:37 pm

With this synth they seem to have got so carried away with the interface that they forgot all about the sound quality. Which seems a bit strange, i would have thought the sound was a tiny bit important.

Also the interface takes up a lot of resources on a slow computer and the Space Invaders thing is pointless - i don't want to play games while writing a tune!

User avatar
royalB
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 am
Location: in transit

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by royalB » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:00 pm

i heard it's got some value..haven't gotten around to playin with it yet though.

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by hasezwei » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:02 pm

mthrfnk wrote:
Dustwyrm wrote:
Benedict wrote: and we all know that dubstep doesn't actually use wobbles any more, right?
This is the second time you've said this statement. I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or serious.

Maybe you're confusing "wobbles" with what the actually are. In this case, LFO's are extremely alive and still being used for all kinds of music production. Just because a bass isn't 'wobbling' doesn't mean that LFOs aren't being used. I know sometimes I'm confusing but this quote you've stated, I don't understand.
He probably means like Skream 2005 bass wobbles vs. Skrillex 2013 wubwubyoi wobbles. :dunce:
edit: i should stop being mean

User avatar
perileyes
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:21 pm

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by perileyes » Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:55 pm

after 30 minutes of dicking around with it, I cannot for the life of me manage to get a clean INIT patch that doesn't have the obnoxious vibrato-y thing going on. To me, that's -10,000 points, particularly in the sound design department. This synth could have a buttload of potential but I feel like the gimmicky "Little Tikes 'My First Dubstep Synth'" qualities to it overshadow any cool features it has. Is it just me or can noone else get a totally static (as in no phase-y or vibrato-y stuff happening) INIT patch going?

User avatar
BassQemistry
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:11 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Sugarbytes Cyclop is....

Post by BassQemistry » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:05 pm

I've messed around with it and I was not impressed at all. I've been learning synthesis for a while now so you'd think I'd be able to come up with a decent sounding patch but, nah didn't happen. I think they rack in decent cash from the same kind of kids that buy Dub Turbo and want to make dubstep NOW. Lol if anyone has made some decent sounds with it I would love to hear them!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests