Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by SCope13 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:13 pm

http://www.factmag.com/2013/02/04/ban-t ... ty-side/2/
Listening all the put-downs you hear of rowdy dubstep, you’d think it was a complete betrayal of dance culture, a systematic removal of the groove and “whitening” of the sound beyond all recognition. This is, however, usually said by people who don’t dance. Dubstep when it originally came along wasn’t just a new sound, it was a systematic re-wiring of the relationship of electronic music to the body: its movements swinging, swaying, full-limbed, big. The half-tempo undertow and the emphasis on notes that throb and undulate as much as on percussive hits have their own very particular sensualism. And the push-pull dynamic that you can hear in the most minimal eyes-down tunes is still there in the rave-beast tracks.

Yes, OK, a moshpit full of teenage boys can be irritating in a club, as can a front row full of guys with their shirts off pumping their fists relentlessly. But look past that: plenty of times I’ve witnessed girls winding their waists and people throwing proper shapes to the same music on the same dancefloor as the rowdy contingent. Look at the brilliant (seriously) Got To Dance on Sky: with each series, you get more and more fifteen and sixteen-year-olds demonstrating insane moves to full-tilt brostep, beautifully fluid fusions of popping, jerking and robotics, with every joint and muscle in their body locked in to the bass undulations as much as to the drum patterns. This is our grass-roots dance music and we should be proud of that.
Thoughts?
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by garethom » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:15 pm

Starts off well, ends up sounding like he's just being contrary to wind up the easily wind-uppable.

I mean, did anybody REALLY like the Skrillex & Korn album? Not even Skrillex & Korn fans seemed to like it haha.

scspkr99
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by scspkr99 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:19 pm

I wasn't there at the beginning but I was around before and it wasn't a systematic rewiring of anything.

I don't hate bro and it takes all sorts but let's not credit dubstep with stuff it wasn't

User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by SCope13 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:21 pm

the comments are jokes too
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
dickman69
Posts: 14517
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:58 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by dickman69 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:42 pm

The half-tempo undertow and the emphasis on notes that throb and undulate as much as on percussive hits have their own very particular sensualism. And the push-pull dynamic that you can hear in the most minimal eyes-down tunes is still there in the rave-beast tracks.
but this is just not true
every Tuesday 11pm EST on http://cosmicsound.club

buy my tunes pls
Soundcloud

User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by SCope13 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:45 pm

the last page of that article was just awful.
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
Figment
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Figment » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:56 pm

made me cringe tbh, big ups for doing what he wants to do, saying what he wants to say, but fuck me just leave it alone, to be completely honest it appears to have completely died down now, i barely even hear about bro anymore.
incnic wrote:eat bass u r a wanker m8 lol
fuk off with ur shite prolems cos im trying to classofy dungeon vs classic dubstep ffs
Giving away some remixes:
Soundcloud

exfox
Posts: 2490
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by exfox » Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:02 pm

BlueyTeamTom wrote:made me cringe tbh, big ups for doing what he wants to do, saying what he wants to say, but fuck me just leave it alone, to be completely honest it appears to have completely died down now, i barely even hear about bro anymore.
this.

User avatar
kidshuffle
Posts: 13473
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:44 am
Location: canada

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by kidshuffle » Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:13 pm

brostep is still huge bros, dont worry.


im with this guy though...i mean its legitimately gotten kids into dance music again, and that can't be anything bad. and tbh i'd rather see a bunch of bros and hoes moshin and havin a good time than a bunch of hipsters chinstroking and bringing the vibe down.
Beats/Facebook/Twitter
Laszlo wrote:
nowaysj wrote:Look at when Jedi's die, and then they become kind of shimmery and holographic.
.... 2Pac was a Jedi?? :corntard:

User avatar
aaronm
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:35 pm
Location: Houston, Tx
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by aaronm » Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:22 pm

kidshuffle wrote:brostep is still huge bros, dont worry.


im with this guy though...i mean its legitimately gotten kids into dance music again, and that can't be anything bad. and tbh i'd rather see a bunch of bros and hoes moshin and havin a good time than a bunch of hipsters chinstroking and bringing the vibe down.
I agree with this completely. People are just having fun and enjoying the music. I don't see why people get bent out of shape over it. It's not like people are erasing pure dubstep tracks out of existence every time some one drops a skrillex tune or something.

User avatar
AntlionUK
Posts: 3823
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:57 am
Location: Gone looting

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by AntlionUK » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:11 pm

i think i prefer a topless dude to someone standing there on their phone talking to twitter
'Live Loops, Sleep Snares, Breathe Beats'

http://soundcloud.com/antlionuk
http://www.mixcloud.com/AntlionUK/
Nevalo wrote:All right. But you tell that slag, that in the ghetto, washing non-colourfast synthetics at 60 degrees could cost you your life...
DRTY wrote:Nan is up there with my cats. Harm them; pay with your life.
wub wrote:Shenanigans
ch3 wrote:shenanigans

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by hasezwei » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:45 pm

yeah, quarter/triplet aka 'push and pull' is totally new and hasnt been done before in every genre known to man (except hardstyle)

big up the chinstroke massive

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:03 am

ugh. this again.

was the most cringeworthy article ive read for sometime..
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

User avatar
AxeD
Posts: 9361
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Damstarem

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by AxeD » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:19 am

The fact that my moves are beyond awesome doesn't mean that crap is actually music.
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.

User avatar
incnic
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 5841
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by incnic » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:23 am

i wrote a proper serous reply to this in brothread but deleted it
but yep terirble article, awful writing,

BRO MUGGS

pity as he is normally more level headed and intellgent...his interviews with Geiom are excellent reading...now this >
this is brostep 'journalism' at it lowest
brostep

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by test_recordings » Sat Feb 09, 2013 2:58 am

Fucking load of shit :lol:

Everything that's been labelled as 'dubstep' is only tediously linked is in that article. A tiny bit about Coki, Hatcha etc.

Man's a joke :?
Getzatrhythm

Phigure
Posts: 14134
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Phigure » Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:01 am

i dont feel like reading 10 pages of brostep apologism

but i did it anyways, shame on me

his points are laughable:
it's dance music? okay? that doesnt necessarily give something merit. i could put my little pony samples over a 4x4 beat and call it dance music

same with his point about it being dj music

soundsystem music? ive avoided brostep nights like the plague, but i remember seeing mary anne hobbs play at coachella and i vividly remember when she played sweet shop in the middle of her set. all the weight that was in the air, the presence you feel from the sub, just instantly vanished. there was nothing... nothing. same thing when i saw joe nice headlining a night with 3 brostep acts before him

it's "insane"? celebrating the pissing contest of making the most "insane" obnoxious noise?

it's metal? korn + skrillex is a good thing? fuck off

it's grimey? brb gonna go mix scary monsters into pulse x... fuck no it isnt grime

it's a gateway to better things? maybe, but for every 1 sonika that decides to get into the "good stuff", theres thousands of kids who never get into nothing more than the shit that comes up when you search "dubstep" on youtube
Last edited by Phigure on Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
j_j wrote:^lol
Soundcloud | Twitter

butter_man
Posts: 1763
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by butter_man » Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:11 am

Another win for the forces of evil in the 'bro vs dub' war. Skrillex wamps, burial cries. :(
garethom wrote:weed ice cream

User avatar
Sonika
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Sonika » Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:39 am

I really like old school Rusko (which I think is what people pinpoint as the beginning of this brostep fad) and I think the direction he was taking was exciting, it's super fun and dance-y and lighthearted.

I'm not sure where it went wrong, but somewhere along that line someone started trying to just make the most maximalist screechy crap they could and it didn't have to be that way, but it was

Could really care less though. Only thing is I hesitate to say I like dubstep when I'm talking to people I don't really know. But it's not as bad as I thought, I'm actually astounded at how many people I meet my age who really know a thing or two about its roots. If we're talking about music and I say I like the deeper more "old school" roots of dubstep, I'm constantly surprised at the fact that the person/people I'm talking to will throw out a couple names that I wouldn't have expected them to know of.
Image

"The idea is to remain in a state of constant departure while always arriving."
-Waking Life

follow me
friend me

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by test_recordings » Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:29 am

If you swop 'dubstep' for 'brostep' the article's alright
Getzatrhythm

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests