acetate discussions
Re: acetate discussions
How well/badly would it work cutting .wavs ripped from CDs? Ruff Sqwads White Label Classics for example? Or for an older example one of the old Terror Danjah or Wiley instrumental CDs? I assume the older ones will produce a poorer quality?
Don't wanna spend money getting them cut and finding out its doo doo.. but it almost seems worth it for some grime instrumentals. Functions on a low for example.
Don't wanna spend money getting them cut and finding out its doo doo.. but it almost seems worth it for some grime instrumentals. Functions on a low for example.
-
charliefoy
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:38 pm
- Location: the fez
Re: acetate discussions
wavs should be coolMuncey wrote:How well/badly would it work cutting .wavs ripped from CDs? Ruff Sqwads White Label Classics for example? Or for an older example one of the old Terror Danjah or Wiley instrumental CDs? I assume the older ones will produce a poorer quality?
Don't wanna spend money getting them cut and finding out its doo doo.. but it almost seems worth it for some grime instrumentals. Functions on a low for example.
Re: acetate discussions
Do they not lose any/much quality being ripped from a CD? I always assumed they would, don't know why lol.
Re: acetate discussions
nah CD quality is CD quality. if you rip it as a wav it should sound great.Muncey wrote:Do they not lose any/much quality being ripped from a CD? I always assumed they would, don't know why lol.
only thing is that it would have been mastered for CD so itl be quite loud and not IDEAL for cutting but it should sound fine imo
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
Re: acetate discussions
Ah fair enough, cheersepochalypso wrote:nah CD quality is CD quality. if you rip it as a wav it should sound great.Muncey wrote:Do they not lose any/much quality being ripped from a CD? I always assumed they would, don't know why lol.
only thing is that it would have been mastered for CD so itl be quite loud and not IDEAL for cutting but it should sound fine imo
Re: acetate discussions
it only loses quality if you rip and then convert it to a lossy format (ie mp3). lossless formats (FLAC etc) don't lose anything.
Re: acetate discussions
Yeah, I've cut tunes mastered for digital and they still sound pretty great.epochalypso wrote:nah CD quality is CD quality. if you rip it as a wav it should sound great.Muncey wrote:Do they not lose any/much quality being ripped from a CD? I always assumed they would, don't know why lol.
only thing is that it would have been mastered for CD so itl be quite loud and not IDEAL for cutting but it should sound fine imo
-
didi
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
- Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ
- Contact:
Re: acetate discussions
It's been fine for me.Muncey wrote:How well/badly would it work cutting .wavs ripped from CDs? Ruff Sqwads White Label Classics for example? Or for an older example one of the old Terror Danjah or Wiley instrumental CDs? I assume the older ones will produce a poorer quality?
Don't wanna spend money getting them cut and finding out its doo doo.. but it almost seems worth it for some grime instrumentals. Functions on a low for example.
Re: acetate discussions
(and mala does it)
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
Re: acetate discussions
could be added to almost any argument in this part of the forum, to end discussions...epochalypso wrote:(and mala does it)
my latest dark UK garage mixtape:
Soundcloud
http://www.factmag.com/2013/01/23/downl ... l-b-mixes/
http://revealomaniac.blogspot.com
Soundcloud
http://www.factmag.com/2013/01/23/downl ... l-b-mixes/
http://revealomaniac.blogspot.com
Re: acetate discussions
He cuts grime tunes ripped from CDs?epochalypso wrote:(and mala does it)
Haha but cheers guys, I was just worried because old grime isn't great quality at the best of times.
Re: acetate discussions
I am gonna get a couple of my tunes cut soon - going to have to send it off and receive in the post, would love to get down to a studio at some point, but for now, what internet service should I go with?
-
charliefoy
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:38 pm
- Location: the fez
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Re: acetate discussions
I've emailed Transition about three times in the past wanting to try their dubs, they never responded
I use Music House in London and Dub Studio in Bristol, both good.
I use Music House in London and Dub Studio in Bristol, both good.
-
charliefoy
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:38 pm
- Location: the fez
Re: acetate discussions
Strange! I even had a jump in a dub and they re-cut it for free. Do you have a link for music house?£10 Bag wrote:I've emailed Transition about three times in the past wanting to try their dubs, they never responded![]()
I use Music House in London and Dub Studio in Bristol, both good.
Re: acetate discussions
that's not completely true. ripping is not simple file copying. even with lossless formats like .wav or .flac the quality depends on the ripping process / the software you use. surely there should only be minor differences, but a rip from an audio cd is no 1:1 copy.epochalypso wrote:nah CD quality is CD quality.Muncey wrote:Do they not lose any/much quality being ripped from a CD? I always assumed they would, don't know why lol.
Re: acetate discussions
"CD audio" encoding is uncompressed (wav/aiff) 16-bit, 44.1 KHz, 20-20000 hz = around 1411 kbps of data stream for a stereo audio signal
which is why if you 'rip' a cd with these settings, you should get as close to 1:1 copy as possible. Every other format ripped from a cd would be an encoding, and require more processing.
Fun fact: In the 90es studios and DATs often used 48 KHz instead (or 96 KHz, and/or 24 bit if you had a reason/money/tape to do it) - the 44.1 has to do with politics about wanting to have CD stay at 5 cm. A executive decision of 48 KHz would have made a lot more sense, and now we are stuck with 44.1 in a lot of audio encoding software. The story is interesting and available online somewhere, don't have time to google it now...
which is why if you 'rip' a cd with these settings, you should get as close to 1:1 copy as possible. Every other format ripped from a cd would be an encoding, and require more processing.
Fun fact: In the 90es studios and DATs often used 48 KHz instead (or 96 KHz, and/or 24 bit if you had a reason/money/tape to do it) - the 44.1 has to do with politics about wanting to have CD stay at 5 cm. A executive decision of 48 KHz would have made a lot more sense, and now we are stuck with 44.1 in a lot of audio encoding software. The story is interesting and available online somewhere, don't have time to google it now...
my latest dark UK garage mixtape:
Soundcloud
http://www.factmag.com/2013/01/23/downl ... l-b-mixes/
http://revealomaniac.blogspot.com
Soundcloud
http://www.factmag.com/2013/01/23/downl ... l-b-mixes/
http://revealomaniac.blogspot.com
-
charliefoy
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:38 pm
- Location: the fez
Re: acetate discussions
off topic...that jah war vip is naughty. very jealousrev wrote:"CD audio" encoding is uncompressed (wav/aiff) 16-bit, 44.1 KHz, 20-20000 hz = around 1411 kbps of data stream for a stereo audio signal
which is why if you 'rip' a cd with these settings, you should get as close to 1:1 copy as possible. Every other format ripped from a cd would be an encoding, and require more processing.
Fun fact: In the 90es studios and DATs often used 48 KHz instead (or 96 KHz, and/or 24 bit if you had a reason/money/tape to do it) - the 44.1 has to do with politics about wanting to have CD stay at 5 cm. A executive decision of 48 KHz would have made a lot more sense, and now we are stuck with 44.1 in a lot of audio encoding software. The story is interesting and available online somewhere, don't have time to google it now...
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Re: acetate discussions
Pretty sure they don't have a website man. I get a mate to ring them up then we go there with the tracks on CD. Acetate cuts on a Neumann - it's fun watching the process first hand!charliefoy wrote:Do you have a link for music house?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests