You mean it didn't say this at the top of your birth certificate?djredi2step wrote:Why should people believe they own where they are/born? Nationalism is so stupid
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
The question regarding rights was directed towards the poster who said that people who lived here longer deserved more rights. Outside of the right to reside I don't agree.hubb wrote:They arewho are they and do you believe you own where you are?And no, I share.the people that care what becomes 'british'.
I'm not sure what you are asking ?Other than the right to reside which people outside of the EU don't qualify automatically what rights should be afforded a British national that should be denied another?
Ethiopian Jews and yeah.wub wrote:Was it Israel that was sterilising refugees a while back?
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland
Find it hilarious that the people who are outraged by immigrants not respecting our country are the same ones who head off to Spain for a few weeks a year, get pissed and smash the place updjredi2step wrote:Why should the population who've been living here for much longer have more rights? Nationality is nothing but an accident of birth. what makes a British national who has been here for ten years more eligible for 'rights' than someone whose been here for 4?Perej wrote:That is totally removed from what people like Nick Griffin said though. Plus - population who've been living here for much longer should undoubtedly have more rights. It's the same in other countries across the globe, it's just that they don't bend over backwards to support immigrants like we do.Pedro Sánchez wrote:Not that far, she thought immigrants should wait in a queue behind British nationals before getting a slice of the British pie, but she was happy to sell it to them at a pretty penny.Perej wrote:She wanted to deport everyone of non-British descent?hubb wrote:Doing a sigh of relief.. is hardly celebrating.
Thatchers politics were similar to BNPs,
Anyway, comments like "Thatchers politics were similar to BNPs" is just bollocks.
Start a fight with a pizza guy cause he won't make a roast dinner on a Sunday. Big up those guys.Liam92 wrote:Find it hilarious that the people who are outraged by immigrants not respecting our country are the same ones who head off to Spain for a few weeks a year, get pissed and smash the place up
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Yes it is an 'accident' I suppose if you want to put it like that. It's subjective and a matter of opinion.djredi2step wrote:Why should the population who've been living here for much longer have more rights? Nationality is nothing but an accident of birth. what makes a British national who has been here for ten years more eligible for 'rights' than someone whose been here for 4?Perej wrote:That is totally removed from what people like Nick Griffin said though. Plus - population who've been living here for much longer should undoubtedly have more rights. It's the same in other countries across the globe, it's just that they don't bend over backwards to support immigrants like we do.Pedro Sánchez wrote:Not that far, she thought immigrants should wait in a queue behind British nationals before getting a slice of the British pie, but she was happy to sell it to them at a pretty penny.Perej wrote:She wanted to deport everyone of non-British descent?hubb wrote:Doing a sigh of relief.. is hardly celebrating.
Thatchers politics were similar to BNPs,
Anyway, comments like "Thatchers politics were similar to BNPs" is just bollocks.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.
agree 100%Perej wrote: Yes it is an 'accident' I suppose if you want to put it like that. It's subjective and a matter of opinion.
I am of the opinion that I am entitled to British healthcare more than lets say, a Polish immigrant because my family contributed towards the creation of the NHS and have been living on these shores for atleast 300 years. They have contributed to the economy of this nation for much longer and some of them fought in two World Wars.
I'm not saying people who haven't lived here for many generations should be denied anything (this doesn't happen anyway), but in the case of things like social housing or healthcare, Brits should take precedent. Seems fair no? Pretty sure they have a similar system in other countries regardless of ethnicity.
If you go to the Taj Mahal in India, they have a line for foreign people and a line for Indians, and Indian nationals pay a lot less. Mostly this is justified because many of those living in Agra are impoverished, but there are also a ton of more wealthy Indians who go in for less. It's just basic courtesy.
Just think it's common sense really.
TopManLurka wrote:sycophants gon sycophant.
Yeah but your parents 'contributed' not you. why should someone be more entitled to something because of who their ancestors are? Just because the Indians do it doesn't make it right. I would be pissed of if I had to wait in a longer queue because I'm not Indian.Perej wrote:
Yes it is an 'accident' I suppose if you want to put it like that. It's subjective and a matter of opinion.
I am of the opinion that I am entitled to British healthcare more than lets say, a Polish immigrant because my family contributed towards the creation of the NHS and have been living on these shores for atleast 300 years. They have contributed to the economy of this nation for much longer and some of them fought in two World Wars.
I'm not saying people who haven't lived here for many generations should be denied anything (this doesn't happen anyway), but in the case of things like social housing or healthcare, Brits should take precedent. Seems fair no? Pretty sure they have a similar system in other countries regardless of ethnicity.
If you go to the Taj Mahal in India, they have a line for foreign people and a line for Indians, and Indian nationals pay a lot less. Mostly this is justified because many of those living in Agra are impoverished, but there are also a ton of more wealthy Indians who go in for less. It's just basic courtesy.
Just think it's common sense really.
SoundcloudAntlionUK wrote:fuck you SNH
Not if the person has paid or is paying tax or insurance that has earned them those entitlements.Perej wrote: Yes it is an 'accident' I suppose if you want to put it like that. It's subjective and a matter of opinion.
I am of the opinion that I am entitled to British healthcare more than lets say, a Polish immigrant because my family contributed towards the creation of the NHS and have been living on these shores for atleast 300 years. They have contributed to the economy of this nation for much longer and some of them fought in two World Wars.
I'm not saying people who haven't lived here for many generations should be denied anything (this doesn't happen anyway), but in the case of things like social housing or healthcare, Brits should take precedent. Seems fair no? Pretty sure they have a similar system in other countries regardless of ethnicity.
If you go to the Taj Mahal in India, they have a line for foreign people and a line for Indians, and Indian nationals pay a lot less. Mostly this is justified because many of those living in Agra are impoverished, but there are also a ton of more wealthy Indians who go in for less. It's just basic courtesy.
Just think it's common sense really.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
