Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
Artie_Fufkin
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:04 pm
- Location: Missouri
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Not just talking about harmonic distortion are you? Because compression distorts the dynamics.
Edit: I think we have different definitions of distortion.
Edit: I think we have different definitions of distortion.
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
The added harmonics are a byproduct of distortion of the waveform. Whether the wave's being clipped by a limiter, pushed into a foldback distortion, rounded off with a soft clipper, or squished with a compressor, they're all doing the same thing. Compressors just have an attack and release phase to try and be more transparent. It's all forms of distortion though, just different application. Run something heavy into a brickwall limiter and tell me you don't hear distortion. Look at a tape saturation preset on a waveshaper and it should be obvious that it's both compressing and adding harmonics.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
I've just been using phase cancellation to remove to added harmonics
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
sorry to be that guy OP but who the fuck cares who else does that....
Just make your records the way you think they should sound. if no one likes your beats or mixes, that's reason to change. If your mixes are terrific then get on with it. this is all a bunch of producer-broscience
Just make your records the way you think they should sound. if no one likes your beats or mixes, that's reason to change. If your mixes are terrific then get on with it. this is all a bunch of producer-broscience
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Wutazuk wrote:I've just been using phase cancellation to remove to added harmonics
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Use the distorted signal, invert the phase then lay that on top of the original, bounce to audio then lay it on top of the distorted copy.
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
So it sounds as if you never distorted it in the first place? 
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
-
Artie_Fufkin
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:04 pm
- Location: Missouri
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
yeah.....you do realize you're getting the original signal back, right?
I think I get what you mean about compression vs. waveshaping now, SunkLo. Waveshaping can distort the signal in the middle of the cycles because it's always on(static) but compression - because it's initiated by something going over the threshold(not static) and has time specific attack and release curves - is supposed to be more transparent because it doesn't just cut in and alter the waveform. That's how compressors work, right? The attack and release have curves to fade in and out, right? But if the fade is too quick, it cuts the waveform and creates harmonics. The same with gates: if you abuse the parameters, you can get some nasty distortion. (actually experienced this one night at a concert and asked the sound guy what it was out of curiosity)
Motu, fair point. This nerdy talk isn't supposed to replace using your ears and the tools available to make a good mix, but some of us enjoy the technical stuff and having an understanding of what the tools actually do.
I think I get what you mean about compression vs. waveshaping now, SunkLo. Waveshaping can distort the signal in the middle of the cycles because it's always on(static) but compression - because it's initiated by something going over the threshold(not static) and has time specific attack and release curves - is supposed to be more transparent because it doesn't just cut in and alter the waveform. That's how compressors work, right? The attack and release have curves to fade in and out, right? But if the fade is too quick, it cuts the waveform and creates harmonics. The same with gates: if you abuse the parameters, you can get some nasty distortion. (actually experienced this one night at a concert and asked the sound guy what it was out of curiosity)
Motu, fair point. This nerdy talk isn't supposed to replace using your ears and the tools available to make a good mix, but some of us enjoy the technical stuff and having an understanding of what the tools actually do.
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Yep, an infinity ratio compressor with 0 attack and release time would just be a hard clipper. Put a soft knee on that and you get a soft clipper. Negative ratios will give you foldback distortion. The timing components of the compressor just make it not as abrupt so it doesn't generate audible distortion.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Well, it all depends on how we interpret compression. Are we talking about wave compression, or dynamic range compression. Because wave compression = distortion, but dynamic range compression ≠ distortion.
Exilium wrote:distorted square
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Well if you have a sine wave and you cut the top off of it, it becomes a pseudo-square wave. And of course square waves have harmonic content and sine waves don't... so yeah compression does cause additional harmonic content as far as I understand it.
WolfCryOfficial wrote:Have fun on your musical campaign to hell.
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
I've been softclipping the master of my recent tunes, adds a really nice warmth to the track.
Mr. Carmack is really good at doing this, most of his tunes have audible "distortion" yet it still sounds clean as hell
Soundcloud
what I do is just stick a soft clipper on the master then turn up the master until it pushes the softclipper a bit, not too much tho
Mr. Carmack is really good at doing this, most of his tunes have audible "distortion" yet it still sounds clean as hell
Soundcloud
what I do is just stick a soft clipper on the master then turn up the master until it pushes the softclipper a bit, not too much tho
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
1. Sine wave DOES have harmonic contentAdd9 wrote:Well if you have a sine wave and you cut the top off of it, it becomes a pseudo-square wave. And of course square waves have harmonic content and sine waves don't... so yeah compression does cause additional harmonic content as far as I understand it.
2. Cutting the top of the wave is called hard clip.
3. Compression is not doing a hard clip.
Exilium wrote:distorted square
-
therealillume
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 12:23 am
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
You got any idea how carmack gets his snares to pop so hard? That track has some pretty nice snares, but the snares he uses in his other stuff blows my mind.gαммα wrote:I've been softclipping the master of my recent tunes, adds a really nice warmth to the track.
Mr. Carmack is really good at doing this, most of his tunes have audible "distortion" yet it still sounds clean as hell
Soundcloud
what I do is just stick a soft clipper on the master then turn up the master until it pushes the softclipper a bit, not too much tho
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
No it doesn't. Break a sine wave down into its constituent partials with a DFT and count how many sine waves there are. There's only one because that's what the wave was to begin with. C'mon man, this is pretty fundamental.mromgwtf wrote: 1. Sine wave DOES have harmonic content
Compressors are doing something closer to soft clipping. It's all acting on the same wave so I don't get your distinction between wave or dynamic range compression. The only difference is the time component with a compressor. Have you tried setting a compressor to 0 attack and infinite ratio? Tell me that's not identical to hard clipping. Put a soft knee on it and tell me it's not soft clipping. This is where I'm telling you guys to not hit it so hot. Either reduce the level going in, or put a softer knee on the waveshaper or compressor you're using.
Please don't post misinformation if you don't know what you're talking about.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
-
Artie_Fufkin
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:04 pm
- Location: Missouri
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
i c wat u did therSunkLo wrote:this is pretty fundamental.
That's neat about the different types of clipping and foldback distortion. I remember the renoise manual explaining what each does(and a fourth kind of nasty distortion I haven't found a use for yet...) but they didn't describe like compression.
Also, as an alternative to multiband soft clipping or compression, you can try volume automation.
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
I would rather use FFT than DFT. But anyway:SunkLo wrote:No it doesn't. Break a sine wave down into its constituent partials with a DFT and count how many sine waves there are. There's only one because that's what the wave was to begin with. C'mon man, this is pretty fundamental.mromgwtf wrote: 1. Sine wave DOES have harmonic content
Compressors are doing something closer to soft clipping. It's all acting on the same wave so I don't get your distinction between wave or dynamic range compression. The only difference is the time component with a compressor. Have you tried setting a compressor to 0 attack and infinite ratio? Tell me that's not identical to hard clipping. Put a soft knee on it and tell me it's not soft clipping. This is where I'm telling you guys to not hit it so hot. Either reduce the level going in, or put a softer knee on the waveshaper or compressor you're using.
Please don't post misinformation if you don't know what you're talking about.
Sine wave doesn't have overtones, but it does have one harmonic.
And 1 != 0 .
No harmonic content = no signal.
And a compressor with 0 attack/release wouldn't be considered a compressor.
You can't even set 0 attack/release on most of the compressors.
Exilium wrote:distorted square
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
lol I had a feeling someone was going to not just assume I meant extra harmonics and feel the need to correct me when I said sine waves don't have harmonics. I guess I need to be ultra-specific next time.mromgwtf wrote:I would rather use FFT than DFT. But anyway:SunkLo wrote:No it doesn't. Break a sine wave down into its constituent partials with a DFT and count how many sine waves there are. There's only one because that's what the wave was to begin with. C'mon man, this is pretty fundamental.mromgwtf wrote: 1. Sine wave DOES have harmonic content
Compressors are doing something closer to soft clipping. It's all acting on the same wave so I don't get your distinction between wave or dynamic range compression. The only difference is the time component with a compressor. Have you tried setting a compressor to 0 attack and infinite ratio? Tell me that's not identical to hard clipping. Put a soft knee on it and tell me it's not soft clipping. This is where I'm telling you guys to not hit it so hot. Either reduce the level going in, or put a softer knee on the waveshaper or compressor you're using.
Please don't post misinformation if you don't know what you're talking about.
Sine wave doesn't have overtones, but it does have one harmonic.
And 1 != 0 .
No harmonic content = no signal.
And a compressor with 0 attack/release wouldn't be considered a compressor.
You can't even set 0 attack/release on most of the compressors.
WolfCryOfficial wrote:Have fun on your musical campaign to hell.
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
Multi account much? lolAdd9 wrote:lol I had a feeling someone was going to not just assume I meant extra harmonics and feel the need to correct me when I said sine waves don't have harmonics. I guess I need to be ultra-specific next time.mromgwtf wrote:I would rather use FFT than DFT. But anyway:SunkLo wrote:No it doesn't. Break a sine wave down into its constituent partials with a DFT and count how many sine waves there are. There's only one because that's what the wave was to begin with. C'mon man, this is pretty fundamental.mromgwtf wrote: 1. Sine wave DOES have harmonic content
Compressors are doing something closer to soft clipping. It's all acting on the same wave so I don't get your distinction between wave or dynamic range compression. The only difference is the time component with a compressor. Have you tried setting a compressor to 0 attack and infinite ratio? Tell me that's not identical to hard clipping. Put a soft knee on it and tell me it's not soft clipping. This is where I'm telling you guys to not hit it so hot. Either reduce the level going in, or put a softer knee on the waveshaper or compressor you're using.
Please don't post misinformation if you don't know what you're talking about.
Sine wave doesn't have overtones, but it does have one harmonic.
And 1 != 0 .
No harmonic content = no signal.
And a compressor with 0 attack/release wouldn't be considered a compressor.
You can't even set 0 attack/release on most of the compressors.
There is a difference between harmonic and an overtone.
Exilium wrote:distorted square
Re: Multiband Soft Clipping vs Compression
i haven't managed to get my snares as good as carmacks, but basically just have them really loud and mix them right and you can make them sound alrighttherealillume wrote:You got any idea how carmack gets his snares to pop so hard? That track has some pretty nice snares, but the snares he uses in his other stuff blows my mind.gαммα wrote:I've been softclipping the master of my recent tunes, adds a really nice warmth to the track.
Mr. Carmack is really good at doing this, most of his tunes have audible "distortion" yet it still sounds clean as hell
Soundcloud
what I do is just stick a soft clipper on the master then turn up the master until it pushes the softclipper a bit, not too much tho
heres a tune I made using soft clipping and loud drums
Soundcloud
proud of the sub on that as well, took me ages to get it sounding dirty but still have the weight
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
