The plural of Lego is....

vonboyage · Post by **vonboyage** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:59 pm

sri wrote:
perkalerk215 wrote:
sri wrote:
perkalerk215 wrote:
Vonboyage wrote:Wooot..

I'll eat you @ K'nex rudegirl!!!!

Bring it, any day - cept thursdays.. any time - between 11:00-18:00..
we cant have knex wars across the atlantic ocean

boooooooooooooooooo!

i really wanna dig my old sets out though and mess with them again.
if you build a bridge to get there out of k'nex you can
im too scared it wouldnt hold...then id fall into that scary bottomless dark mean ocean....oh boy. those pics in the uglies thread are reason enough for me to never attempt to cross the atlantic on anything other than a plane.
true, you might end up falling into this little fella's mouth

Im guna travel around the world, find that little bastard and kill it.

cant sleep at night knowing that's out there.. and i might fall victim to its SUCTION*

EDIT:*

perkalerk215 · Post by **perkalerk215** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:12 pm

haha its SUCTION. ew imagine taking a dip into the ocean and walkin out onjly to find that little fella sucked to your side or something. i bet hes super slimey too.

perkalerk215 · Post by **perkalerk215** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:15 pm

drum syndicate wrote:
perkalerk215 wrote:i was a HUGE fan of legoS and knex. me and my brother were killer builders with the knex though. better believe.
I <3 you how say legoS!
hahahha

well thats what i think it is. nothing anyone has said has given me reason enough to call it only lego...its totally legoS.

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:28 pm

LEGO. k NEXS.. where shit only ever bought one set.. was not feeling them for some reason.. felt to exposed.. fuck it this wa last thing i made out of lego

[/img]

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:28 pm

LEGO for the win!

Legos is just totally, absolutely, horribly wrong.

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:31 pm

was big in to scifi and lego was a way of venting my creative side chekc this out

[img][img]http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/5065/20041014simon0023xm0.jpg[/img]
[/img][/list]

municiple · Post by **municiple** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:52 pm

clearly it is legitos.

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:20 pm

legos

perkalerk215 · Post by **perkalerk215** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:22 pm

Parson wrote:legos

yus yus! i need to get together my legoS army!

drum syndicate · Post by **drum syndicate** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:28 pm

You must all listen to the Parson

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:09 am

drum syndicate wrote:You must all listen to the Parson

fuck parson he is a wace man..

LEGO even says it on the bricks itself.. lego bricks not leggos bricks.. ur all retarted.. for fuck sake .. WAKE THE FUCK UP !

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:09 am

drum syndicate wrote:You must all listen to the Parson

fuck parson he is a wace man..

LEGO even says it on the bricks itself.. lego bricks not leggos bricks.. ur all retarted.. for fuck sake .. WAKE THE FUCK UP !

perkalerk215 · Post by **perkalerk215** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:16 am

DUDE..if youre calling the block itself by the name it was born as (lego)...then its just LEGO BLOCKS.if you call the blocks a diff name like how tissues are called KLEENEX...same thing. its not fuckin rocket science! its legoS. if im wrong, ill cut off a finger.

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:31 am

This thread is headed for WAR!

Time for FACT HAMMER:

http://www.lego.com/

http://www.legos.com/

sri · Post by **sri** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:38 am

two oh one wrote: This thread is headed for WAR!

Time for FACT HAMMER:

http://www.lego.com/

http://www.legos.com/

ahhhh shiiiiit! they ARE both right! yowzers!

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:42 am

sri wrote:
two oh one wrote: This thread is headed for WAR!

Time for FACT HAMMER:

http://www.lego.com/

http://www.legos.com/

ahhhh shiiiiit! they ARE both right! yowzers!

Nope!

Link 'A' shakes your hand firmly and takes you to the LEGO website.

Link 'B' says "Hey there, You added an 's' because you're an ignorant thicky and deserve nothing short of a massive public flogging. Please click here to visit the LEGO site"

vonboyage · Post by **vonboyage** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:53 am

two oh one wrote:
Nope!

Link 'A' shakes your hand firmly and takes you to the LEGO website.

Link 'B' says "Hey there, You added an 's' because you're an ignorant thicky and deserve nothing short of a massive public flogging"

Lol, I was going to say something along these lines.

3rdeye · Post by **3rdeye** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:30 am

two oh one wrote:
Nope!

Link 'A' shakes your hand firmly and takes you to the LEGO website.

Link 'B' says "Hey there, You added an 's' because you're an ignorant thicky and deserve nothing short of a massive public flogging. Please click here to visit the LEGO site"

Case closed!

parson · Post by **parson** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:53 am

hold up hold up hold up

legos is still way more correct than lego as a plural as it addresses that the blocks are nouns

calling plural lego is wrong in more ways than i can get my head around

anybody calling the plural of lego, lego is clearly bonkers

legos or lego pieces and thats that

parson · Post by **parson** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:54 am

you can't prove that the plural of lego is lego by citing the corporation saying that lego is an adjective and then claim victory

The plural of Lego is....

The plural of Lego is....

Who is online