George Zimmerman

kidshuffle · Post by **kidshuffle** » Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:56 pm

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/george ... um=twitter

EliteLennon117 · Post by **EliteLennon117** » Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:41 pm

yo fuck zimmerman

Sexual_Chocolate · Post by **Sexual_Chocolate** » Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:09 pm

magma · Post by **magma** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:06 am

kidshuffle wrote:http://www.clickorlando.com/news/george ... um=twitter

orangeluva56 wrote:yall are still on about this? just let it go. man was found not guilty. he's free to do what he wants now. if he wants to buy a shotgun, punch his inlaws, threaten his wife with a gun and then goad her into stepping close enough to him to invoke Stand Your Ground that's his right, that's the beauty of being an american.

kidshuffle · Post by **kidshuffle** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:36 am

You forgot slashing up a mans ipad

Vodun · Post by **Vodun** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:37 am

zimmerman apologists lol. apparently we're not allowed to be outraged at blatant injustice. Should we have let the people that killed Stephen Lawrence go too?

bennyfroobs · Post by **bennyfroobs** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:42 am

magma wrote:
kidshuffle wrote:http://www.clickorlando.com/news/george ... um=twitter

orangeluva56 wrote:yall are still on about this? just let it go. man was found not guilty. he's free to do what he wants now. if he wants to buy a shotgun, punch his inlaws, threaten his wife with a gun and then goad her into stepping close enough to him to invoke Stand Your Ground that's his right, that's the beauty of being an american.

orangeluva ur sarcasm is 2 much sometime hahaah

on a serious note i cant believe ppl r still trying to defend this wanker, especially since he had a history of vioelnce against womena nd the popo even before the t martin case.

a dn evidence was clearlyyyyy manipulated in tbha trayvon martin case. its as if ppl think that defence lawyers ARENT payed to lie through their teeth. eugh morons. racist morons.

test_recordings · Post by **test_recordings** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:07 pm

More like money-grabbing pricks. If there was nothing in it for defending him, they wouldn't have done it.

magma · Post by **magma** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:12 pm

His wife's gonna get a hell of a book deal.

bennyfroobs · Post by **bennyfroobs** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:27 pm

test recordings wrote:More like money-grabbing pricks. If there was nothing in it for defending him, they wouldn't have done it.

arent all lawyers money grabbing pricks though?

scspkr99 · Post by **scspkr99** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:44 pm

Is he not entitled to the best defence he can get? What would people do differently, not have him defended?

wub · Post by **wub** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:49 pm

scspkr99 wrote:Is he not entitled to the best defence he can get? What would people do differently, not have him defended?

Judging from most of the reactions on here, a tall tree and a sturdy rope would probably factor in.

magma · Post by **magma** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:51 pm

scspkr99 wrote:Is he not entitled to the best defence he can get? What would people do differently, not have him defended?

I think the original comments were about people defending him online/in conversation rather than defending in the courtroom.

scspkr99 · Post by **scspkr99** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:06 pm

wub wrote: Judging from most of the reactions on here, a tall tree and a sturdy rope would probably factor in.

Which would be almost ironic. But yeah I agree.

scspkr99 · Post by **scspkr99** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:09 pm

magma wrote: I think the original comments were about people defending him online/in conversation rather than defending in the courtroom.

I think this is likely correct but I think the rush to blame lawyers tends to happen whenever there's a verdict people disagree with. Given that the ethics of a particular situation are in focus it seems weird when people advocate immoral solutions to moral failures.

magma · Post by **magma** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:15 pm

I haven't seen much criticising of the lawyers, to be fair... well, apart from the prosecution for not preparing their witnesses well enough. But I agree, the lawyers all did their jobs properly and as you'd hope they would in a free country - people should direct their anger at America's justice system, not its executors.

Jhonny2x4 · Post by **Jhonny2x4** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:38 pm

My opinion is I don't care. There are plenty of worse things in this world and this case is down there with what miley cirus is wearing to the mtv music awards. There has always been bad people in this world, and this is just one more.
I'm more interested in when they will start increasing the red baloon count in lucky charms again.

kidshuffle · Post by **kidshuffle** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:48 pm

Jhonny2x4 · Post by **Jhonny2x4** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 4:48 pm

No Problem!

also

bennyfroobs · Post by **bennyfroobs** » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:51 am

not blaming lawyers. theyre paid to lie/bend the truth, its their job

im talkin boot zimmerman defenders/apologists elsewhere in the media and just in gnernearl

dont really care aobut this case but the trayvon case was a big thing for black peoples in america because it coudlve been somewhat of a turning point in them getting constantly shat on by the US justice system

but no

George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Re: George Zimmerman

Who is online