Post your unpopular opinions.

showguns · Post by **showguns** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:55 pm

Misk wrote:i dont understand. kathy griffin is hilarious!

FSTZ · Post by **FSTZ** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:03 pm

Misk wrote:i dont understand. kathy griffin is hilarious!

she's pretty funny on stage

but I cant watch her show for more than 5 minutes

metalboxproducts · Post by **metalboxproducts** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:17 pm

FlashHarry wrote:
Schamotnik wrote:
dTruk wrote:female comedians aren't funny...

Dubstep does not have a good attitude towards women, its a private member male club thats aggressive sound rises out of being rejected by women because you don't understand them.

Not true. I've met loads of girls through dubs step and i would say they are more intellegent, independent, funny, and less image consious then most girls.
I wouldn't call dubstep exclusive in any way. Maybe you've had a bad experiance. Not sure.

feasible_weasel · Post by **feasible_weasel** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:18 pm

cathy birke is hilarious

kins83 · Post by **kins83** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:29 pm

metalboxproducts wrote: Not true. I've met loads of girls through dubs step and i would say they are more intellegent, independent, funny, and less image consious then most girls.
I wouldn't call dubstep exclusive in any way. Maybe you've had a bad experiance. Not sure.

I met my current girlfriend at Exodus, and I'd agree with all those points!

thomas · Post by **thomas** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:44 pm

forensix (mcr) wrote:
perkalerk215 wrote:i have an even love for female and male comedians. funny thing though is that for the life of me, i cant remember any of my favorite female comedians. but the male ones i know. wonder why. i guess youre all right. the female ones arent as important or funny enough to stick in my head
wow i don't think you could have said absolutely nothing in any more words

On a rampage haha, out his way.

classagraphics · Post by **classagraphics** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:46 pm

i dont believe that viruses cause disease

i beleive most people who believe in viruses don't even know what they are what they are or what they are supposedly doing to their body

slim · Post by **slim** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:52 pm

classagraphics wrote:i dont believe that viruses cause disease

i beleive most people who believe in viruses don't even know what they are what they are or what they are supposedly doing to their body

What, pray tell does cause diseases then? Apart from bacteria, fungi, environment etc. You believe HIV is a myth then?

razer-wire · Post by **razer-wire** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:58 pm

my unpopular opinion is
60 minute make over is cool

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:11 pm

hiv is a bad example of virii existing

cold and flu is much better

slim · Post by **slim** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:15 pm

Parson wrote: hiv is a bad example of virii existing

cold and flu is much better

How so? Mostly chose that one cos it was the first one that popped into my mind, but there are people who deny HIV / AIDS exists, or that it is not actually caused by a retrovirus

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:18 pm

i am of the unpopular opinion that HIV and AIDS are not related

slim · Post by **slim** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:29 pm

parson wrote: i am of the unpopular opinion that HIV and AIDS are not related

Interesting, what makes you think that? To me it pretty much stands to reason, HIV attacks CD4 receptors in the white blood cells as it replicates, causing a deficiency in the immune system, and causing AIDS. Anti-retroviral drugs work quite well in delaying or halting the progression of HIV into AIDS by preventing the spread of the HIV virus within the body.

Don't think i'm being sarky, i am generally interested in your reasons.

slim · Post by **slim** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:30 pm

And by generally i mean genuinely

*grand* · Post by ***grand*** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:46 pm

this had me in stitches.. and is most definetly an unpopular opinion.. lol...

http://cowlander.neobahumut.com/LOL%20P ... %20lol.jpg

stanton · Post by **stanton** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:46 pm

metalboxproducts wrote: Not true. I've met loads of girls through dubs step and i would say they are more intellegent, independent, funny, and less image consious then most girls.
I wouldn't call dubstep exclusive in any way. Maybe you've had a bad experiance. Not sure.

Yes, I'm too drunk to talk to them AND make sense at the same time. I tried the other day and rambled on about Deleuze for about 5 minutes..... ooh sexy.

metalboxproducts · Post by **metalboxproducts** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:49 pm

*Grand* wrote:this had me in stitches.. and is most definetly an unpopular opinion.. lol...

http://cowlander.neobahumut.com/LOL%20P ... %20lol.jpg

Yeah that was funny. haha. Really purile but hey.

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:51 pm

Slim wrote:
parson wrote: i am of the unpopular opinion that HIV and AIDS are not related
Interesting, what makes you think that? To me it pretty much stands to reason, HIV attacks CD4 receptors in the white blood cells as it replicates, causing a deficiency in the immune system, and causing AIDS. Anti-retroviral drugs work quite well in delaying or halting the progression of HIV into AIDS by preventing the spread of the HIV virus within the body.

Don't think i'm being sarky, i am generally interested in your reasons.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ion%3Along

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:52 pm

aw shit it was taken down

we had a whole thread about it and ppl get very upset and talk about how offended they are that i think their friend got AIDS from something other than sex

slim · Post by **slim** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:57 pm

Was it the Gary Null one? I saw a part of it, don't have time to watch the whole thing, but the argument that no-one has proven that HIV leads to AIDS is flawed. No individual has proved it, but the amount of cumulative evidence seems fairly incontrovertible. Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo seem to have come as close as possible to proving it as anyone though, and both won the Japan prize, so they have received recognition for it, contrary to what one of the people in Null's video said.

They did prove fairly conclusively that HIV causes damage to CD4 receptors on the cells responsible for immune response, and it has been shown that the CD4 count decreases as the HIV antibody levels increase.

I'm not going to get stressed out by someone's opinion, thinking independently and investigating claims is what science is about, but i would like to know what do you personally believe is wrong with the accepted theory?

Post your unpopular opinions.

Who is online