CDJ-900NXS

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

CDJ-900NXS

Post by wub » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:34 am



Might be time to upgrade from my 1000s :lol:

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:43 am

whats the retail on these?

i do like some of the new functions (compared to the 800/1000) with rekord box etc, but that sync button... little downs.
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wub » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:45 am

Nevalo wrote:whats the retail on these?
More than you can afford, pal.

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:46 am

wub wrote:
Nevalo wrote:whats the retail on these?
More than you can afford, pal.
find anotherway home pizza boy
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:50 am

but on the cereal, what numbers are we looking at? (kindly do the needfull and tell me)
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wub » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:20 am

The CDJ-900 NXS units will be released next month, and come in at prices of: $1,399 / €1,399 / £1,149.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wub » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:21 am

Also, no hot cues?

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:44 am

wub wrote:
The CDJ-900 NXS units will be released next month, and come in at prices of: $1,399 / €1,399 / £1,149.
safe.

also, you set hotcues on rekordbox iirc, so id assume its possible.
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Genevieve » Fri Nov 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Think I'd rather still spin on 1000s. I doubt the built quality has improved and there's really not that much more you can do with them from a beatmatching perspective, that a pair of well taken care of 1000s can't do.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
baddis98
Posts: 2541
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by baddis98 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 4:13 pm

i don't understand how pioneer keep adding up to that gimmick feature list and still haven't managed to build in simple hot cues or a basic reloop button.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wub » Fri Nov 22, 2013 4:15 pm

baddis98 wrote:i don't understand how pioneer keep adding up to that gimmick feature list and still haven't managed to build in simple hot cues or a basic reloop button.
What's a basic reloop button?

Agree re; the hot cues...seems weird the 1000s had them but they've been left off the 2000s/900s Nexus range.

User avatar
baddis98
Posts: 2541
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by baddis98 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 4:19 pm

wub wrote:
baddis98 wrote:i don't understand how pioneer keep adding up to that gimmick feature list and still haven't managed to build in simple hot cues or a basic reloop button.
What's a basic reloop button?
one that starts playing right from the cue point. as far as i remember you have to set a loop first and then reloop and exit.

User avatar
Capture pt
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:19 am
Location: Southampton

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Capture pt » Fri Nov 22, 2013 11:39 pm

strange they use ethernet cable rather than USB. wonder why that is.

CDJS's are stupidly complicated. It's taken them far too long to get USB memory stick option - that really should of been 1st priority right after they were made.

I'd love for Pioneer/someone to make a CDJ that has literally the standard deck functions and a USB stick slot. And charge £400 for it. One can wish.

User avatar
Terpit
Posts: 11097
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:06 am

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Terpit » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:49 am

Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by m8son666 » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:41 am

i swear they are moving closer and closer to just being a controller, not that thats a bad thing. All they do is advertise every other way to use them rather than using CDs i wonder how long before they stop calling them CDJs
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

User avatar
Terpit
Posts: 11097
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:06 am

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Terpit » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:52 am

USBJs are the new in thing
Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:03 am

too bad they'll cost just as much, or even more. fuckin pioneer.
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wolf89 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:33 am

Don't see the point.

If I can cue up and speed up/slow down tracks with the pitch fader and jog wheel then I've got enough.

Everything else is pointless wanking about with someone elses music that's already been written to fit a structure. Doing billions of loops and shit is pointless.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wub » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:04 am

wolf89 wrote:Doing billions of loops and shit is pointless.
You must not like techno.

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: CDJ-900NXS

Post by wolf89 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:55 pm

wub wrote:
wolf89 wrote:Doing billions of loops and shit is pointless.
You must not like techno.
I listen to loads of techno, but it's not where someone is pointlessly doing shit like these cdjs are demonstrating. I know that there's a lot of messing about with other peoples tracks like blending for insane amounts of time, using four turntables at once or jamming along with a 909 or whatever but that was still done by guys on vinyl just pushing djing to silly extreme. Not this "let's do very obvious sounding loops on a cdj that's instantly recognizable as being something that a cdj can do instead of just mixing the track in it's normal form interestingly". It's the fact this shit on cdjs sounds so bait and obvious and just ruins the flow of a track that's the problem. It's like when you have a shit digital flanger on a pioneer mixer. Who the fuck ever thinks "wow, this tune is nice but it really needs to sound like someone put a terrible sounding flanger on the master bus for 8 bars"?

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests