Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
bennyfroobs
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
Location: the rainy north

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by bennyfroobs » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:01 pm

m8son wrote:lol i have tried google all that comes up is newspaper articles, do you not remember where you saw it?
haha sorry man, if i remembered i honestly would have posted it for you, it was a while ago now and my memory is hazy as it is (not hazy about this, i can actually remember the stuff i read pretty well, just about everything else. dates, peoples faces, what i had for breakfast)
Image
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':

-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.

User avatar
Terpit
Posts: 11097
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:06 am

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Terpit » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:06 pm

hmmm, that's tricky, I don't think everyone carrying a weapon should be shot, I'm not actually sure where I stand, but he would have probably killed someone with that gun, keep that in mind. It's a weird one, that's for sure, I think we all agree that this guy was a nasty twat though, this operation wouldn't have been planned otherwise.

The police did handle this badly tho
Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*

Doozle
Posts: 861
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:28 pm

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Doozle » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:20 pm

djredi2step wrote:this is a good article
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... ons-police
He's on channel 4 news in the next few minutes

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by test_recordings » Fri Jan 10, 2014 3:16 am

Doozle wrote:
djredi2step wrote:this is a good article
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... ons-police
He's on channel 4 news in the next few minutes
It's kind of obvious the police fucked it tbh
Getzatrhythm

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by magma » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:09 am

Terpit wrote:hmmm, that's tricky, I don't think everyone carrying a weapon should be shot, I'm not actually sure where I stand, but he would have probably killed someone with that gun, keep that in mind. It's a weird one, that's for sure, I think we all agree that this guy was a nasty twat though, this operation wouldn't have been planned otherwise.
It seems pretty simple tbh - we don't have the death penalty in this country, let alone summary execution without trial. The *only* time a policeman should fire a weapon is when he's under a direct threat from an armed suspect (i.e. a gun being pointed directly at them)... given that Duggan apparently tossed a gun wrapped in a sock from the moving car before he was engaged, it seems fairly clear that he wasn't posing a clear threat. The police should've either moved in to arrest him or kept their powder dry and picked him up another time; whatever plans he had, he obviously wasn't going to be able to carry them out once he'd chucked the weapon.

Even if he was on his way to do something nasty, this isn't minority report and we most certainly can't justify using lethal force based on gut assumptions and still claim to be an 'enlightened' society. Society has to be better than its criminals (that's why they're criminals)
Last edited by magma on Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

scspkr99
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by scspkr99 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:09 am

Terpit wrote:hmmm, that's tricky, I don't think everyone carrying a weapon should be shot, I'm not actually sure where I stand, but he would have probably killed someone with that gun, keep that in mind. It's a weird one, that's for sure, I think we all agree that this guy was a nasty twat though, this operation wouldn't have been planned otherwise.

The police did handle this badly tho
That's a massive leap

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by m8son666 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:26 am

magma wrote:The *only* time a policeman should fire a weapon is when he's under a direct threat from an armed suspect (i.e. a gun being pointed directly at them)... given that Duggan apparently tossed a gun wrapped in a sock from the moving car before he was engaged, it seems fairly clear that he wasn't posing a clear threat. The police should've either moved in to arrest him or kept their powder dry and picked him up another time; whatever plans he had, he obviously wasn't going to be able to carry them out once he'd chucked the weapon.
Do you not think the policemen must of thought he was under a direct threat? or do you think he knew there was no threat and killed him anyway? It's very easy to say what he should of done in hindsight and with unlimited amount of time to ponder alternatives. In the heat of the moment if you believe your or a friend's life is in danger, rightly or wrongly, i'm sure you would of done the same thing.

The thing i can understand people being pissed off about is the lack of accountability of the police, whatever the reason the policemen shot the guy he should of had some form of punishment. I think the cameras that have been proposed will go along way to solving this problem.
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

scspkr99
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by scspkr99 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:30 am

I'd expect armed police to be a bit better prepared for the situation than I would be

User avatar
bennyfroobs
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
Location: the rainy north

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by bennyfroobs » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:38 pm

^ye they shot EACH OTHER as well lol. fuckin useless

m808son, do u not think the fact that duggan got shot in the back while he was running away would infer that wasnt really that much of a threat tho? shit, this guys doing some dangerous fleeing, better cap the fucker

terpit, re. "he had a gun, he was gonna shoot someone".... just look at the amount of people in america who have guns? are they all gonna shoot someone? dnt get me wrong i dont think anyon should have them, clearly recipies for disaster
Image
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':

-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.

User avatar
Laszlo
Posts: 3845
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Laszlo » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:00 pm

bennyfroobs wrote:^ye they shot EACH OTHER as well lol. fuckin useless

m808son, do u not think the fact that duggan got shot in the back while he was running away would infer that wasnt really that much of a threat tho? shit, this guys doing some dangerous fleeing, better cap the fucker
I am under the impression the first shot went through Duggan's arm and then struck a police officer. The second, fatal shot was fired as Duggan was going down from the first. I don't think there was any running involved.
The shot that killed him sounds plausible. The first shot could have been a legitimate mistake.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:11 pm

Look, once you train someone to be an armed marksman, you have psychologically give them the urge to carry out that training, the same way a muscle head can't wait to take his shirt off after all them gym sessions. The way one feels when in charge of all that power with no release must be like holding back on creaming yourself when Megan Fox is saddling you. They have been trained to mame and kill and are always waiting for the chance of some action.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
Laszlo
Posts: 3845
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Laszlo » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:16 pm

That is wildly speculative.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:18 pm

It's the nature of man, some can hold back the urge but the type that wants to become a copper more often than not, is slightly deluded and seeks an authoritarian position or they just want a career with some action.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

Riddles
Posts: 4819
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 am
Location: Brighton

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Riddles » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:21 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:It's the nature of man, some can hold back the urge but the type that wants to become a copper more often than not, is slightly deluded and seeks an authoritarian position or they just want a career with some action.
Laszlo wrote:That is wildly speculative.
Image
soronery wrote:Too easy to sit behind a keyboard with a playlist of dubstep tunes on, arguing about the defintion of a word in relation to a sound.
All that melts away when the lights are down and the bass is up.

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by garethom » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:28 pm

Terpit wrote:if the police shot a gang member who had a gun in his car over here, i would be glad, one less scum bag on the streets. how many people do you reckon he's assaulted/mugged/raped? because come on, only serious people carry guns in their vehicles
I like you Terpit, but that might be the most stupid non-trolling thing I've read on DSF in ages.

I can only sincerely hope one day that nobody ever looks at you as a scum bag, and that nobody "reckons" you've ever assaulted or raped anyone.

nousd
Posts: 8654
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:22 am
Location: approaching the flux pavillion

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by nousd » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:51 pm

however unjust this case is

I have a gun should be a corollary of I'm now more likely to be shot dead
{*}

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by Forum » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:23 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote: The way one feels when in charge of all that power with no release must be like holding back on creaming yourself when Megan Fox is saddling you. .
Not really relevant but I find Megan Fox extremely unatractive.

In a country like this with such a small gun presence it probably takes a certain kind of person to want to be on an armed response unit
Image Image

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by m8son666 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:25 pm

my m8s dad is an armed policeman and has a severe case of small man syndrome, in fact i bet there aren't any armed police taller than 6 foot
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

User avatar
bennyfroobs
Posts: 4532
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
Location: the rainy north

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by bennyfroobs » Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:51 pm

Laszlo wrote:
bennyfroobs wrote:^ye they shot EACH OTHER as well lol. fuckin useless

m808son, do u not think the fact that duggan got shot in the back while he was running away would infer that wasnt really that much of a threat tho? shit, this guys doing some dangerous fleeing, better cap the fucker
I am under the impression the first shot went through Duggan's arm and then struck a police officer. The second, fatal shot was fired as Duggan was going down from the first. I don't think there was any running involved.
The shot that killed him sounds plausible. The first shot could have been a legitimate mistake.
yea my bad he wasnt running away when he got shot

its doesnt sound like it was unintentional in the slightest tbh

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25657206
Image
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':

-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police

Post by m8son666 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 3:12 pm

lol how could he have seen if he had a gun or not at ~150m 20/20 vision or not :lol:
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests