Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
-
alphacat
- Posts: 6016
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:52 pm
Post
by alphacat » Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:54 pm
DCist wrote:
Congress: Mostly Millionaires!
That Congress is full of millionaires may not surprise you. But would you be shocked to know that, for the first time ever, a majority of current members are millionaires? Still no?
An analysis by the
Center for Responsive Politics found that at least 268 of the 534 current members "had an average net worth of $1 million or more in 2012."
The median net worth for the 530 current lawmakers who were in Congress as of the May filing deadline was $1,008,767 -- an increase from last year when it was $966,000. In addition, at least one of the members elected since then, Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), is a millionaire, according to forms she filed as a candidate. (There is currently one vacancy in Congress.)
Last year only 257 members, or about 48 percent of lawmakers, had a median net worth of at least $1 million.
The richest member of Congre$$ is D.C.'s
buddy Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who "had an average net worth of $464 million in 2012." In 2012, there were
46.5 million people in poverty in this country. That's 15 percent.
And an excellent comment:
Doesn't it seem a little suspicious that someone with tens of millions in the bank would seek out a job that only pays $174,000?

-
nowaysj
- Posts: 23281
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
- Location: Mountain Fortress
Post
by nowaysj » Fri Jan 10, 2014 4:13 am
What is it for just the senate? I know pelosi and feinstein came in as paupers, earned a decent income but have somehow amassed multi-multimillion dollar portfolios... how could they do that? Oh yeah, selling the US population into slavery.

Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud
-
wub
- Posts: 34156
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
- Location: Madrid
-
Contact:
Post
by wub » Fri Jan 10, 2014 7:16 am
This is also the most ineffective Congress in history, they've passed fewer bills than any other;
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/dec/11 ... 3-20131211
WASHINGTON -- The 113th Congress looks to be a sure bet to go down as the most ineffective in history.
Just 56 bills were signed into law so far in 2013, as the first session prepared to wrap up. For the first time in recent memory, the number of new laws didn’t even come close to breaking triple digits.
Even counting Tuesday’s bipartisan budget compromise -- which conservative critics already are threatening to derail -- this Congress is so far behind its predecessors it will need to pass a flurry of laws next year to catch up.
Last year’s 112th Congress currently holds the title as the most inactive, with 231 bills passed into law. Prior to that, 1995’s 104th Congress had the worst track record with 333 laws. And even 1948’s notorious “do nothing” Congress, so called by President Harry S. Truman for its relative inaction, managed to push through 906 laws.
-
NickUndercover
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Belgium
Post
by NickUndercover » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:53 am
but DEERAYGOOLAYSHUN tho
cloaked_up wrote:im not a fan of belgium tho TBQH (genocide in the congo anyone????)
-
test_recordings
- Posts: 5079
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
- Location: LEEDS
Post
by test_recordings » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:07 am
I don't get why Congress is being measured on how effective it is by how many laws it passes?
If it's a shit law being considered, I wouldn't want it just for the sake of counting it!
I'd rather they looked at existing law and modified that, like the UK does. Unless that is actually how they do it?
Getzatrhythm
-
nowaysj
- Posts: 23281
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
- Location: Mountain Fortress
Post
by nowaysj » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:12 am
Well, the ship is sinking, the house is burning, and the sky is falling, would be dope if our government did something to protect the country they supposedly govern.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud
-
NickUndercover
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Belgium
Post
by NickUndercover » Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:19 am
Pull a Chris Christie and stop them from physically getting to Congress
cloaked_up wrote:im not a fan of belgium tho TBQH (genocide in the congo anyone????)
-
nowaysj
- Posts: 23281
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
- Location: Mountain Fortress
Post
by nowaysj » Sat Jan 11, 2014 6:01 am
In the future?
You really have no idea.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud
-
test_recordings
- Posts: 5079
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
- Location: LEEDS
Post
by test_recordings » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:43 am
Okay okay.
Blatantly obvious to the point where everyone knows and accepts it.
Right now, a lot of people still have blinkers on
Getzatrhythm
-
rockonin
- Posts: 3515
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:05 pm
- Location: Buttoned Up
Post
by rockonin » Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:23 pm
nowaysj wrote:What is it for just the senate? I know pelosi and feinstein came in as paupers, earned a decent income but have somehow amassed multi-multimillion dollar portfolios... how could they do that? Oh yeah, selling the US population into slavery.


-
rockonin
- Posts: 3515
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:05 pm
- Location: Buttoned Up
Post
by rockonin » Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:22 pm
lol Cheers, I aim to please.
-
m8son666
- moist
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
- Location: MODERATOR
-
Contact:
Post
by m8son666 » Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:37 pm
hahaha what the fuck
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests