The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
fragments
Posts: 3552
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: NEOhio
Contact:

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by fragments » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:38 am

Personally I am not really worried about the debate. I like using hardware and getting away from the computer. For me the magic is in the physicality of it. Maybe its voodoo but it works for me.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by nowaysj » Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:39 am

LumiNiscent wrote:On a modular system you can plug CV output into an audio input for weird noises for example, not possible on a computer afaik (correct me if im wrong)
You are wrong. :lol:
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

leeany
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:16 pm
Location: AMSTERDAM
Contact:

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by leeany » Sun Apr 06, 2014 6:30 pm

nowaysj wrote:
LumiNiscent wrote:On a modular system you can plug CV output into an audio input for weird noises for example, not possible on a computer afaik (correct me if im wrong)
You are wrong. :lol:
What software lets you do that? Reason?

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by wub » Sun Apr 06, 2014 6:34 pm

Jeskola Buzz springs to mind, you should be able to do it on there.

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by wolf89 » Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:13 pm

Nord Modular too

But you don't get the same experience as having the modules sat in front of you with all the patching options to hand. You still have to think of them more rather than start doing it

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:30 pm

i will mostlikely never have the money to buy a real synth or compressor etc but i truly believe it has a dif sound and even the experience to actually pull some real buttons and change sth inside the box you use :U:
but than again some of the drum machines are sampled inside out :oops:
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by wub » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:15 pm

BudSpencertron wrote:i will mostlikely never have the money to buy a real synth or compressor etc but i truly believe it has a dif sound and even the experience to actually pull some real buttons and change sth inside the box you use :U:
but than again some of the drum machines are sampled inside out :oops:
Alesis 3630 you can get for cheap in terms of compressor. Same with the right synths/drum machines. Volca Beats are cheap, same with something like a Casio RZ-1 or a Boss DR-110.

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:32 pm

thanks yeah i know about some cheaper ones but yeah 100 bucks seems fairly legit :W:

i was talking along those lines of the virus and stuff but if those cheaper solutions get the same job done its a no brainer :Q:
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by wub » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:37 pm

BudSpencertron wrote:thanks yeah i know about some cheaper ones but yeah 100 bucks seems fairly legit :W:

i was talking along those lines of the virus and stuff but if those cheaper solutions get the same job done its a no brainer :Q:

It's about what,you do with it, tbh. That's the point of the article in op. can make tunes with Casio keyboards if you know how to get sounds out of it and what to do with those sounds once you have them.

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:40 pm

ah no dont get me wrong i do get the idea i support gtg and all the tal freeware whenever i can but it seems if people have the money they go for the virus etc so i am jsut wondering if theres a noticable difference like this z filter in dnb you can get only with some special analogfilter forgot the name :oops: sherman? or sth

i do agree its all about the time and effort you are willing to spend with every little detail of what you have
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by nowaysj » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:45 pm

I think bud would be in trouble in low budget hardware land, his aesthetic is very controlled. Don't let him fool you. To get that kind of control all in hardware is very expensive, and then won't be of that much quality. You have to accept some serious fidelity/cleanliness issues if you go into hardware at any level other than near the highest.

The ability to just compress and eq everything in software blows hardware setups out of the water. Imo, it is hard to go back to budget hardware. It is fun, and I do it. But that mush is a hard pill to swallow.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by deadly_habit » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:54 pm

BudSpencertron wrote:ah no dont get me wrong i do get the idea i support gtg and all the tal freeware whenever i can but it seems if people have the money they go for the virus etc so i am jsut wondering if theres a noticable difference like this z filter in dnb you can get only with some special analogfilter forgot the name :oops: sherman? or sth

i do agree its all about the time and effort you are willing to spend with every little detail of what you have
The zplane on emus has yet to be emulated properly imo, viruses well they have a unique workflow in spite of being VA, same way I'm with my Micron vs say Massive making similar patches. A Sherman filterbank is always a wise investment I want one badly.

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:55 pm

:3 now i sound like an asshole agian lol
but honestly dont most producers use the analog synths as a rather dry signal anyways? i mean i might be wrong but thats what i get out of all those videos sample analog and work with it in digital land so maybe the cheaper ones and the pricey ones get closer than like 10 years ago? thats just my feeling though i might be totally wrong
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by deadly_habit » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:56 pm

BudSpencertron wrote::3 now i sound like an asshole agian lol
but honestly dont most producers use the analog synths as a rather dry signal anyways? i mean i might be wrong but thats what i get out of all those videos sample analog and work with it in digital land so maybe the cheaper ones and the pricey ones get closer than like 10 years ago? thats just my feeling though i might be totally wrong
Yea I never get that, even my VA shit run through tubes or tape.

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:57 pm

deadly habit wrote: The zplane on emus has yet to be emulated properly imo
ah ok emus :i:
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:02 pm

deadly habit wrote: Yea I never get that, even my VA shit run through tubes or tape.
sorry i am not familiar with va but anyways tube and tape at the end or like inbefore reverb,delay those long tail stuff and maybe limiter if needed
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

User avatar
Aufnahmewindwuschel
Posts: 2143
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Aufnahmewindwuschel » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:08 pm

virtual analog? haha was my only idea cause i heard virus is a vst too :oops:
jedi govna, picka ти materina
glasses?
Soundcloud

User avatar
SunkLo
Posts: 3428
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:54 am
Location: Canadaland

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by SunkLo » Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:40 pm

deadly habit wrote:The zplane on emus has yet to be emulated properly imo,
Weird thing is, all IIR filters are designed on the Z plane. So pretty much any filter apart from linear phase is a Z plane filter.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by Genevieve » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:48 pm

fragments wrote:
Genevieve wrote:I've always found it odd that a forum mainly inhabited by members who scoff at materialism have such a hard-on for new, big expensive boxes with buttons and big flickering lights that don't really do a whole lot they can't already do with their DAW. The music making/talking-about-and-lusting-over-gear ratio seems rather off.
Yea. But I don't like using the mouse and MIDI controllers, for the most part, bore me.
I mean gear aquisition in the broader sense, it could also be the latest convoluted synth VST with a million dropdown menus that you'll never use. Workflow is workflow and if working with a particular set of hardware gear gets you better results than anything else, you should use that. But when does it end? People then aquire this new gear, make 2 or 3 half tunes with it and they're already bidding on another set of gear.

Now I take no stances on consumerism either way since... well, I'm not big on value judgements and not very firm on morality any way. I'm not one to dictate how people should be happy and I see the subjective appeal in consumerism, but I just find it curious that a forum with a very prevailing anti-consumerist culture houses a subforum supposedly dedicated to 'production' where most of the talk centered around consumerist exploits.

It's no different from the way vinyl is fetishized here, however. But whatever.
Last edited by Genevieve on Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation

Post by m8son666 » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:51 pm

Yeah it's weird i also don't understand the people that can blab on for days about all this gear and all these techniques but never actually make any music or put the music they do make out anywhere. Each to their own i guess but seems strange to me.
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests