The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
					Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
	By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Personally I am not really worried about the debate. I like using hardware and getting away from the computer. For me the magic is in the physicality of it. Maybe its voodoo but it works for me.
			
			
									
									SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
You are wrong.LumiNiscent wrote:On a modular system you can plug CV output into an audio input for weird noises for example, not possible on a computer afaik (correct me if im wrong)
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
What software lets you do that? Reason?nowaysj wrote:You are wrong.LumiNiscent wrote:On a modular system you can plug CV output into an audio input for weird noises for example, not possible on a computer afaik (correct me if im wrong)
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Jeskola Buzz springs to mind, you should be able to do it on there.
			
			
									
									
						Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Nord Modular too
But you don't get the same experience as having the modules sat in front of you with all the patching options to hand. You still have to think of them more rather than start doing it
			
			
									
									
						But you don't get the same experience as having the modules sat in front of you with all the patching options to hand. You still have to think of them more rather than start doing it
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
i will mostlikely never have the money to buy a real synth or compressor etc but i truly believe it has a dif sound and even the experience to actually pull some real buttons and change sth inside the box you use  
 
but than again some of the drum machines are sampled inside out
			
			
									
									
						but than again some of the drum machines are sampled inside out
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Alesis 3630 you can get for cheap in terms of compressor. Same with the right synths/drum machines. Volca Beats are cheap, same with something like a Casio RZ-1 or a Boss DR-110.BudSpencertron wrote:i will mostlikely never have the money to buy a real synth or compressor etc but i truly believe it has a dif sound and even the experience to actually pull some real buttons and change sth inside the box you use![]()
but than again some of the drum machines are sampled inside out
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
thanks yeah i know about some cheaper ones but yeah 100 bucks seems fairly legit  
 
i was talking along those lines of the virus and stuff but if those cheaper solutions get the same job done its a no brainer
			
			
									
									
						i was talking along those lines of the virus and stuff but if those cheaper solutions get the same job done its a no brainer
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
BudSpencertron wrote:thanks yeah i know about some cheaper ones but yeah 100 bucks seems fairly legit![]()
i was talking along those lines of the virus and stuff but if those cheaper solutions get the same job done its a no brainer
It's about what,you do with it, tbh. That's the point of the article in op. can make tunes with Casio keyboards if you know how to get sounds out of it and what to do with those sounds once you have them.
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
ah no dont get me wrong i do get the idea i support gtg and all the tal freeware whenever i can but it seems if people have the money they go for the virus etc so i am jsut wondering if theres a noticable difference like this z filter in dnb you can get only with some special analogfilter forgot the name 
 sherman? or sth 
i do agree its all about the time and effort you are willing to spend with every little detail of what you have
			
			
									
									
						i do agree its all about the time and effort you are willing to spend with every little detail of what you have
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
I think bud would be in trouble in low budget hardware land, his aesthetic is very controlled.  Don't let him fool you.  To get that kind of control all in hardware is very expensive, and then won't be of that much quality.  You have to accept some serious fidelity/cleanliness issues if you go into hardware at any level other than near the highest.
The ability to just compress and eq everything in software blows hardware setups out of the water. Imo, it is hard to go back to budget hardware. It is fun, and I do it. But that mush is a hard pill to swallow.
			
			
									
									
						The ability to just compress and eq everything in software blows hardware setups out of the water. Imo, it is hard to go back to budget hardware. It is fun, and I do it. But that mush is a hard pill to swallow.
- 
				deadly_habit
 - Posts: 22980
 - Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
 - Location: MURRICA
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
The zplane on emus has yet to be emulated properly imo, viruses well they have a unique workflow in spite of being VA, same way I'm with my Micron vs say Massive making similar patches. A Sherman filterbank is always a wise investment I want one badly.BudSpencertron wrote:ah no dont get me wrong i do get the idea i support gtg and all the tal freeware whenever i can but it seems if people have the money they go for the virus etc so i am jsut wondering if theres a noticable difference like this z filter in dnb you can get only with some special analogfilter forgot the namesherman? or sth
i do agree its all about the time and effort you are willing to spend with every little detail of what you have
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
:3 now i sound like an asshole agian lol 
but honestly dont most producers use the analog synths as a rather dry signal anyways? i mean i might be wrong but thats what i get out of all those videos sample analog and work with it in digital land so maybe the cheaper ones and the pricey ones get closer than like 10 years ago? thats just my feeling though i might be totally wrong
			
			
									
									
						but honestly dont most producers use the analog synths as a rather dry signal anyways? i mean i might be wrong but thats what i get out of all those videos sample analog and work with it in digital land so maybe the cheaper ones and the pricey ones get closer than like 10 years ago? thats just my feeling though i might be totally wrong
- 
				deadly_habit
 - Posts: 22980
 - Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
 - Location: MURRICA
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Yea I never get that, even my VA shit run through tubes or tape.BudSpencertron wrote::3 now i sound like an asshole agian lol
but honestly dont most producers use the analog synths as a rather dry signal anyways? i mean i might be wrong but thats what i get out of all those videos sample analog and work with it in digital land so maybe the cheaper ones and the pricey ones get closer than like 10 years ago? thats just my feeling though i might be totally wrong
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
ah ok emusdeadly habit wrote: The zplane on emus has yet to be emulated properly imo
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
sorry i am not familiar with va but anyways tube and tape at the end or like inbefore reverb,delay those long tail stuff and maybe limiter if neededdeadly habit wrote: Yea I never get that, even my VA shit run through tubes or tape.
- Aufnahmewindwuschel
 - Posts: 2143
 - Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
 - Location: Antarctica
 
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
virtual analog? haha was my only idea cause i heard virus is a vst too  
			
			
									
									
						Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Weird thing is, all IIR filters are designed on the Z plane. So pretty much any filter apart from linear phase is a Z plane filter.deadly habit wrote:The zplane on emus has yet to be emulated properly imo,
Blaze it -4.20dB
						nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
I mean gear aquisition in the broader sense, it could also be the latest convoluted synth VST with a million dropdown menus that you'll never use. Workflow is workflow and if working with a particular set of hardware gear gets you better results than anything else, you should use that. But when does it end? People then aquire this new gear, make 2 or 3 half tunes with it and they're already bidding on another set of gear.fragments wrote:Yea. But I don't like using the mouse and MIDI controllers, for the most part, bore me.Genevieve wrote:I've always found it odd that a forum mainly inhabited by members who scoff at materialism have such a hard-on for new, big expensive boxes with buttons and big flickering lights that don't really do a whole lot they can't already do with their DAW. The music making/talking-about-and-lusting-over-gear ratio seems rather off.
Now I take no stances on consumerism either way since... well, I'm not big on value judgements and not very firm on morality any way. I'm not one to dictate how people should be happy and I see the subjective appeal in consumerism, but I just find it curious that a forum with a very prevailing anti-consumerist culture houses a subforum supposedly dedicated to 'production' where most of the talk centered around consumerist exploits.
It's no different from the way vinyl is fetishized here, however. But whatever.
					Last edited by Genevieve on Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
									
			
									
namsayin
:'0
Re: The Gear Myth - hardware fetishisation
Yeah it's weird i also don't understand the people that can blab on for days about all this gear and all these techniques but never actually make any music or put the music they do make out anywhere. Each to their own i guess but seems strange to me.
			
			
									
									Soundcloud
						kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

