Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Post
by rickyarbino » Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:48 pm
Sidetrack from the Machiavellian-ism test
http://psychometrics.akresgr.org/spatialtest
3 sections, four minute time limit each. Optional survey at the end. See how well you can obtain information from 3-dimensional environments, which glorified seeing if you think about it, but yeah. Thought I'd do quite averagely, got 20, so it's not difficult imo.
Score range Interpretation
8-16 Normal
17+ Very good
20+ Very, very good

magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
-
dickman69
- Posts: 14517
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:58 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Post
by dickman69 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:03 pm
19
I remember you need to be good at this in chemistry (organic/crystal chemistry)
A lot of people need those models for that shit but i could always just interpret how the shapes change in my head
-
m8son666
- moist
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
- Location: MODERATOR
-
Contact:
Post
by m8son666 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:49 pm
14
rayman612 wrote:
I remember you need to be good at this in chemistry (organic/crystal chemistry)
A lot of people need those models for that shit but i could always just interpret how the shapes change in my head
Yeah a lot of organic is visualising shit like this, which is probably why i'm not very good at it haha
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.
-
rockonin
- Posts: 3515
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:05 pm
- Location: Buttoned Up
Post
by rockonin » Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:51 pm
ultraspatial wrote:7 lol
Thats what I got

-
ascent
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:14 pm
Post
by ascent » Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:42 pm
24
tbh i am slightly proud of that
-
Liam92
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 12:16 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Post
by Liam92 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:23 pm
ultraspatial wrote:7 lol
Same here
I went through it all in about 5 minutes though, totally crap at it.
-
skimpi
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:25 am
Post
by skimpi » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:08 am
i couldnt be arsed half way through lol
TopManLurka wrote:
thanks for confirming
Oi
Oiii #
BELTER
-
Shum
- Posts: 9851
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:14 am
Post
by Shum » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:19 am
20 some of those were tough.
-
rev
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 11:15 am
- Location: cph, dk
-
Contact:
Post
by rev » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:21 am
18. the last of the first two section were especially hard considering the time limit.
-
leeany
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:16 pm
- Location: AMSTERDAM
-
Contact:
Post
by leeany » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:47 am
(8 correct in section one, 6 correct in section two, 2 correct in section three)

-
kay
- Posts: 7343
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:50 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by kay » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:02 pm
15...5 correct in each section, at least I'm consistent.
Felt a bit tired and bored halfway through the 3rd one though.
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Post
by rickyarbino » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:32 pm
Since we're doing it. My section scores were 8, 6, and 6, for sections 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests