Serato sl3 or sl4? for output/processing quality...

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
hulotings
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:18 pm

Serato sl3 or sl4? for output/processing quality...

Post by hulotings » Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:56 am

Hey, I'm debating whether to get the sl3 or sl4. My main concern is the output/processing quality. I know that the sl4 has 2 usb inputs, which is a bonus but in terms of sound quality, which would be better?

I would be recording from a djm800 mixer into a MOTU 828 audio interface (and then onto a computer), so would having the 96khz option (sl4) really be that necessary? Do many other DJ's actually record mixes using the 96khz, or is 48khz fine? A lot of the files I mix with are wav, only 44.1khz anyway..

I know that both have 24-bit (at the moment I have sl1, which is 16-bit), just trying to work out which is more useful purely based on the quality of the output.

Many thanks for your help as always!

webstarr
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Serato sl3 or sl4? for output/processing quality...

Post by webstarr » Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:44 am

I'm fairly sure there's no difference between the SL2, SL3 & SL4 in terms of processing quality

hulotings
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Serato sl3 or sl4? for output/processing quality...

Post by hulotings » Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:10 pm

Thanks webstarr. But what about the 48/96khz switch? Is that unnecessary or something worth having in the future?

User avatar
pete_bubonic
Posts: 4000
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:06 pm
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Serato sl3 or sl4? for output/processing quality...

Post by pete_bubonic » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:40 pm

I think the SL2 has less outputs than the SL3 but the quality is the same. Personally I think the SL4 is only really applicable if you're using video, otherwise it's a massive expense on things that you just won't use.
I make music as Forsaken, you can DL all my unreleased (and a couple released) bits here.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests