Nah no point in having an argument. both analogue and digital audio processing/recording/synthesis methods are useful for different things and so both have a place as tools in modern music
Last edited by wolf89 on Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
only dicks use analog cos its not as good as massive vst at makin wobbels.
what wolf said is correct tho. in a recording and mixing context they both have thier place. my favorite playback medium is vinyl but its such a ball ache so i would usually opt for 320kbps mp3. the only thing where analog is massively better every time is pre amps imo.
wolf89 wrote:Nah no point in having an argument. both analogue and digital audio processing/recording/synthesis methods are useful for different things and so both have a place as tools in modern music
i don't have a preference i just want you to argue so i can write about it
so to start im gonna write a broad intro bout da technical differences and peoples preference/opinions
then i think I'm gonna try narrow it down to synthesis. so I'm gonna test about 5 analog synths, 5 digital, and then analyze these using fuzzmeasure(http://supermegaultragroovy.com/products/FuzzMeasure/). see the comparisons and write bout dat
then I'm gonna make some samples using both doing identical phrases and do a human blind test and write bout dat
then write some more bla bla bla
just be good to have a lot of different opinions going into it so i can beef it out a bit easier
I know quite a bit about the technical aspect, but don't really have a strong opinion.
Would definitely employ the analogue clock, digital clock metaphor though. I find that's the best way
to explain that there's still a difference between a high sample rate and a truly analogue signal.
Or looking at the similarities between aliasing in sound and image.
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
Analogue is better because peasants can't afford it. Every tnuc with an internet connection downloads Massive and Vengeance sample packs and we wonder why all the shit sounds the same.
wolf89 wrote:Nah no point in having an argument. both analogue and digital audio processing/recording/synthesis methods are useful for different things and so both have a place as tools in modern music
/tread
parson wrote:the way you cure disease with lsd is by manipulating the matrix with your mind
so to start im gonna write a broad intro bout da technical differences and peoples preference/opinions
then i think I'm gonna try narrow it down to synthesis. so I'm gonna test about 5 analog synths, 5 digital, and then analyze these using fuzzmeasure(http://supermegaultragroovy.com/products/FuzzMeasure/). see the comparisons and write bout dat
then I'm gonna make some samples using both doing identical phrases and do a human blind test and write bout dat
then write some more bla bla bla
just be good to have a lot of different opinions going into it so i can beef it out a bit easier
talk about valves and 'physicality'. one of the reasons analogue sounds so good is it exists in a physical realm before it leaves a speaker. stuff going through gas, air, tubes etc, always sounds better than something str8 out of a chip. can't beat the physical world tbh
parson wrote:the way you cure disease with lsd is by manipulating the matrix with your mind
wolf89 wrote:both analogue and digital ... are useful for different things
That's not the point though. The point is using them interchangeably for the same thing. And it seems specifically, synthesis in this case.
Agent, search my username in the production forum, and the terms 'analog' and 'digital'. I've been in a million of those conversations over there. Not the most learned, but points have been raised.
AxeD wrote:I know quite a bit about the technical aspect, but don't really have a strong opinion.
Would definitely employ the analogue clock, digital clock metaphor though. I find that's the best way
to explain that there's still a difference between a high sample rate and a truly analogue signal.
Or looking at the similarities between aliasing in sound and image.
lloydnoise wrote:
talk about valves and 'physicality'. one of the reasons analogue sounds so good is it exists in a physical realm before it leaves a speaker. stuff going through gas, air, tubes etc, always sounds better than something str8 out of a chip. can't beat the physical world tbh
yeah nice one i put a bit about both in my proposal
wolf89 wrote:both analogue and digital ... are useful for different things
That's not the point though. The point is using them interchangeably for the same thing. And it seems specifically, synthesis in this case.
Agent, search my username in the production forum, and the terms 'analog' and 'digital'. I've been in a million of those conversations over there. Not the most learned, but points have been raised.
sweet ill have a good look tomorrow. all day on dsf #EDUCATION