Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
-
Muncey
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:30 pm
- Location: Northants/Manchester
Post
by Muncey » Wed Nov 12, 2014 8:47 pm
scspkr99 wrote:have you read any of John McDowell on Wittgenstein?
One of the philosophers I generally prefer to go to secondary sources.
I haven't but I'll check it out! I actually really enjoy reading 'secondary sources' of philosophy. Its definitely as enjoyable, if not more so, than reading original philosophical texts.
hubb wrote:Anyone read the new Naomi Klein yet?
Looking forward to that.
She's basicly stating that the world will be destroyed in a decade or two if we don't rid ourselves of capitalism now.
I might check it out eventually, got a lot to read atm.. keep starting things and not finishing them. It'd be interesting to see how it differs from other books, seems in 2014 writing a book on capitalism vs climate is a little late to the party; theres already been a huge amount written on the topic. Even before climate issues there has always been the idea of a 'finite world' and its conflict with endless accumulation.
-
scspkr99
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am
Post
by scspkr99 » Fri Nov 14, 2014 9:27 am
Muncey wrote:
I haven't but I'll check it out! I actually really enjoy reading 'secondary sources' of philosophy. Its definitely as enjoyable, if not more so, than reading original philosophical texts.
Mind Value and Reality is the one
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php? ... 0674007130
It's sections where McDowell represents Wittgenstein's later work I found essential to understanding him. It's not particularly historical but treats the subject from the perspective of contemporary philosophy.
-
hubb
- Posts: 8823
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ
Post
by hubb » Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:08 pm
Muncey wrote:scspkr99 wrote:have you read any of John McDowell on Wittgenstein?
One of the philosophers I generally prefer to go to secondary sources.
I haven't but I'll check it out! I actually really enjoy reading 'secondary sources' of philosophy. Its definitely as enjoyable, if not more so, than reading original philosophical texts.
The ironic bit is that Wittgensteins philosophy (and imo genious) centers around knowing the subject first hand. The Descartes statement 'I think, therefore I am' is the driving force in Ws philosophy aswell - but further evolved, stating that if you don't have language or a term for a specific principle it simply doesn't exist. Meaning that thought is dependent on having language attached to it. So read the original
hubb wrote:Anyone read the new Naomi Klein yet?
Looking forward to that.
She's basicly stating that the world will be destroyed in a decade or two if we don't rid ourselves of capitalism now.
I might check it out eventually, got a lot to read atm.. keep starting things and not finishing them. It'd be interesting to see how it differs from other books, seems in 2014 writing a book on capitalism vs climate is a little late to the party; theres already been a huge amount written on the topic.
Even before climate issues there has always been the idea of a 'finite world' and its conflict with endless accumulation.
I'm 30 pages in and it's all ready a must read. It's quite positive too, surprisingly.
-
Muncey
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:30 pm
- Location: Northants/Manchester
Post
by Muncey » Fri Nov 14, 2014 6:27 pm
hubb wrote:It's quite positive too, surprisingly.
Maybe thats the difference from other books then lol. The stuff I've read mostly concludes getting rid of capitalism/consumerism or we're doomed. Pretty much an apocalyptic view.
-
hubb
- Posts: 8823
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ
Post
by hubb » Fri Nov 14, 2014 6:31 pm
yeah totally
She's one of the better humans we have tbh.
-
ultraspatial
- Posts: 7818
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:17 pm
- Location: Bromania
Post
by ultraspatial » Mon Nov 17, 2014 1:48 am
L. Ron Hubbard - Scientology: A History of Man
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Post
by rickyarbino » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:10 am
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
-
rockonin
- Posts: 3515
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:05 pm
- Location: Buttoned Up
Post
by rockonin » Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:49 pm
I'm a big Sherlock Holmes fan so I got a new book called Moriarty.

-
hubb
- Posts: 8823
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ
Post
by hubb » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:25 pm
Iain Banks
the busyness
as good as any of his other ones that are all amazing
this one is about illuminaty type stuff but not clicheed at all, very realistic but entertaining..
-
cyclopian
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Oakland, CA
Post
by cyclopian » Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:16 pm
rockonin wrote:I'm a big Sherlock Holmes fan so I got a new book called Moriarty.

I've been seeing that around. I'm a huge fan of the original stuff but I've got a distrust of the newer bits i've been seeing around.
Let me know if its holds up to the original vibe
-
mason666
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:51 am
Post
by mason666 » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:17 pm
Finally finished sickness unto death by Kierkegaard, took me ages, reading it felt like i was having a stroke.
Got a huge backlog of books to get through after Christmas, think i'll probably read the age of reason by sartre or the plague by camu next.
nowaysj wrote:Only came back to tell Maxon he is a little cnut
wolf89 wrote:I look like an idiot
-
wilson
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 6:51 pm
- Location: East London/Essex
Post
by wilson » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:22 pm
Got this for xmas, enjoyable so far. Still trying to figure out why the comedic process is so interesting.
-
hubb
- Posts: 8823
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ
Post
by hubb » Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:28 pm
dear mason have some nietsche and wittgenstein instead
maybe some of the german berlin school guys
that other stuff is stuff you would already have had an idea about
camus can basically fuck off imo and i haven't even read his stuff

lol
-
hubb
- Posts: 8823
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ
Post
by hubb » Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:29 pm
kitten, but for real ^
Let me put it another way.
The existentialist stuff is usually the bit, people asking themself huge questions tend to think they need to know about. In that sence Kirkegård is great and deep, but a whole lot of the other newer existentialist stuff becomes trite psychology pop instead, because they don't pose the necessary planes to take it somewhere else. It's navel gazing... except in very few occasions, like when Wittgenstein convinces his reader that to even begin to conceptualize anything out of the abstract (bringing a thought alive) you need to have a counterpart in an actual word - term. Which takes the old 'I think therefore I am' -thing a step further, meaning he forces existentialism itself onto terms and concepts and in that sence, develop a language for it. Most other existentialists will just tell you that an idea is a flower or something.
Just saying.
-
mason666
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:51 am
Post
by mason666 » Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:45 pm
haha why don't you like camus? myth of sisyphus is probably my favourite book i've read not that i've read many ha.
I've got thus spoke zarathustra in the to read pile, what wittgenstein would you reccomend?
nowaysj wrote:Only came back to tell Maxon he is a little cnut
wolf89 wrote:I look like an idiot
-
butter_man
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:46 pm
Post
by butter_man » Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:59 pm
try and get your head round tractatus.
next time I give it a go i'm gonna need a guide.
3.414 I think it was I got up to. something to do with the wording had me read it again and again until I gave up. wouldn't go past till it made sense and alas..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractatus_ ... losophicus
apparently his only book length philosophical work.
garethom wrote:weed ice cream
-
mason666
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:51 am
Post
by mason666 » Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:03 pm
wikipedia wrote:Wittgenstein concluded that the Tractatus had resolved all philosophical problems

will check it out
nowaysj wrote:Only came back to tell Maxon he is a little cnut
wolf89 wrote:I look like an idiot
-
hubb
- Posts: 8823
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ
Post
by hubb » Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:28 pm
dont know if i can figure out what they are called in english tbh
if you do run into some of it
just skip around a bit and see if it clicks
just noticed i said the same thing about w a page ago

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests