sub tip

ch4rlie_2k · Post by **ch4rlie_2k** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:05 am

GibidyBogidyGibidyBogidyGibidyBogidyGibidyBogidy

Sorry!

deamonds · Post by **deamonds** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:06 pm

rekorder wrote:
Future One wrote:Clowns.
tnuc.

ha!

John Locke · Post by **John Locke** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:46 pm

apeks wrote:
http://download.yousendit.com/1A6C2E9D3A29F02F

Generated the sine waves in Cool Edit, they are 16 bit 44.1khz, all peaking at 0db I think.

thanks, appreciated

wasteman · Post by **wasteman** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:26 pm

Tremourz wrote:
wasteman wrote:
Auan wrote:
Future One wrote:
Tremourz wrote: Synths oscillations aren't as pure as a single eqed frequency band pass with a high Q creating a self oscillating frequency. It's really important to get good full notes that are just sub fundamental.
What on earth are you talking about?
He means synths don't make pure sine waves. Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.
Lol.

This thread is hilarious, I love the pseudo science that gets thrown around.

Does anyone truly believe a sine wave created in a synth like massive is actually inferior?
Not inferior, just not as pure. All depends on what you want to use it for. There's less harmonics in a self-oscillating resonance. At least I've had better results this way.

A sine wave has no harmonics, its just the fundamental frequency.

tudniillik wrote:808 kick is self oscillation , too, he is right

I dunno what you mean, an 808 kick is really just a sine wave with some pitch modulation.

armada · Post by **armada** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:32 am

Auan wrote: Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.

what do you think is "making" those oscillations in the oscillators? its not a big mule turn wheel or control voltages etc. in this digi-realm, its all math: its about who's got the better algo-rythms.

nick z · Post by **nick z** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:44 pm

Thanks for the chart. Cheers. Z

tremourz · Post by **tremourz** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:53 pm

armada wrote:
Auan wrote: Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.
what do you think is "making" those oscillations in the oscillators? its not a big mule turn wheel or control voltages etc. in this digi-realm, its all math: its about who's got the better algo-rythms.

I'm not talking about your source waveform although that will help. I'm talking about the filtering you do to it....resonances in specific frequencies.

serox · Post by **serox** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:01 pm

Sorry to sound dumb, but how are you using that chart to your advantage?

skape · Post by **skape** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:48 pm

Yo Future that Tank Graphic is wicked.

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:08 pm

I kind of like it when some sub notes are heavier than others. It breathes a bit of much needed life into things and breaks up the relentless monotony.

r · Post by r » Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:21 pm

even when you've your powerfull sub... you still need to mix it right. Does it also experiences brutal in your track ?

like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...

how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think

vadarfone · Post by **vadarfone** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:35 am

even when you've your powerfull sub... you still need to mix it right. Does it also experiences brutal in your track ?

like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...

how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think

What?

spherix · Post by **spherix** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:56 am

Tremourz wrote:
armada wrote:
Auan wrote: Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.
what do you think is "making" those oscillations in the oscillators? its not a big mule turn wheel or control voltages etc. in this digi-realm, its all math: its about who's got the better algo-rythms.
I'm not talking about your source waveform although that will help. I'm talking about the filtering you do to it....resonances in specific frequencies.

you can make a straight sine in a VSTi subtractive synth, and just not subtract anything (ie do not use filter, EQ ETCETCETC)

forensix (mcr) · Post by **forensix (mcr)** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:00 am

R wrote:even when you've your powerfull sub... you still need to mix it right. Does it also experiences brutal in your track ?

like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...

how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think

wow

spherix · Post by **spherix** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:52 am

yeah what was that guy talkin aboot

deadly · Post by **deadly** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:08 am

apeks wrote:http://download.yousendit.com/1A6C2E9D3A29F02F

Any chance of a re-up please mate?

r · Post by r » Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:41 am

yeah i know my english isnt really good... but i mean its also about experiencing subbass. When you've a wack climax/drop but your subbass is on the good hz, it won't feel that strong.

sollabong · Post by **sollabong** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:07 pm

cmon guys.. go and make music!!!! i said music..not science!!

dj_smilee · Post by **dj_smilee** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:29 am

R wrote:yeah i know my english isnt really good... but i mean its also about experiencing subbass. When you've a wack climax/drop but your subbass is on the good hz, it won't feel that strong.

pretty much pot luck wether your lowest note hits the sweet spot of a system, i'm a sucker for the really low stuff, like Appleblim's Fear

fuagofire · Post by **fuagofire** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:19 am

cheers for this

sub tip

?

Who is online