i agree. every vestax deck i've been on has been superb.sapphic_beats wrote:yeah i was hoping to see something besides vestax bashing. i have always had technics myself, but i have played on plenty of different decks (something everyone should do), and in my not-so-humble opinion, the vestax PDX-2000 stands the test.manray wrote:The PDX-2000's are probably the best decks ever made. I've had mine for 7 years and they are still holding up. (the main thing i worried about since technics 1200s are made like bricks)
obviously i worry about the construction not being as sturdy as technics, but these things fucking ROCK! platter height (and not seeing the pitch dots) took a minute to get used to, but other than that...SOLID frickin decks. pleasure to play on. c'mon...reverse? that shit is fun. ultra pitch is also niftay (combine that with the pitch shift on a pioneer djm 500 or 600 and you have some fun possiblities on your hands). less skippage.
i won't debate the fact that technics are still the industry standard, but the pdx2000 is a damn good deck.
pdx a1 were my favourite i think

and i have these at home, which i'd rather mix on than technics

and my bro has the pdx2000s, which are unrivalled (apart from pdx3000 or qfo maybe) for scratching. great for mixing once you get used to how sensitive they are

i don't understand why my brother bought these decks when he only mixes drum and bass. he doesn't scratch, beat juggle or mix hip hop. he just beat mixes dnb. i think he made a mistake buying these decks for the purpose of straight mixing, he should have got technics imo. when you mix at a club, they have technics, so it makes sense to have them at home too i would have thought.
i don't own technics. they are great but not worth the money, because i'd only get mk5gs if i got some - and they are a fucking rip off! i'd say if you just want to mix records, get 1210s, if you want to scratch or beatjuggle, obviously get vestax, because they don't like skipping!