Corpsey wrote: Just to check- Reason is shite for chopping up/using breaks isn't it? Or is that just me being shite
Reason, yes.
ReCycle, no.
I think?
I was gonna argue that the Amen sounds the way it does because it was recorded for a buck and a half. Turns out you're right, it was released by one of the biggest R&B labels at the time.TeReKeTe wrote:FWIW the original breaks were NOT recorded w/ low fidelity, they were recorded on the state-of-the-art equipment for the time. badass drummers, experienced engineers, neumann mic's, amek desks and 1/4" tape (and, in the case of the meters, an 1176) are NOT lo-fi in the least. different from today's standards, sure, but we're talking about the equivalent of $250,000 of gear in that sentence alone.

Auan wrote:I was gonna argue that the Amen sounds the way it does because it was recorded for a buck and a half. Turns out you're right, it was released by one of the biggest R&B labels at the time.TeReKeTe wrote:FWIW the original breaks were NOT recorded w/ low fidelity, they were recorded on the state-of-the-art equipment for the time. badass drummers, experienced engineers, neumann mic's, amek desks and 1/4" tape (and, in the case of the meters, an 1176) are NOT lo-fi in the least. different from today's standards, sure, but we're talking about the equivalent of $250,000 of gear in that sentence alone.
My bad

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests