London skyscrapers

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Locked
User avatar
boomnoise
Posts: 6298
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:56 am
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by boomnoise » Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:52 pm

Excellent, an architecture thread.

So which is your favourite?

Hard to beat the Swiss Re tower imho, despite it being widely heralded as the architectural equivalent of Coldplay. I can see it out of my bedroom window and have dreamt about it. These buildings can utterly change London living so i reckon the skyline needs to be give some consideration - I wouldn’t want all of these going up.

The 20 Fenchurch Street building is my favourite out of the none realised projects. Something about its bulbous post-ipod design.

A couple of them are just asking for trouble.
Last edited by boomnoise on Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
boomnoise
Posts: 6298
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:56 am
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by boomnoise » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:03 pm

That said, i can see things getting a lot denser and darker. Like Deckard's 2012 LA. Canary Wharf maxed out with smog deadened lights; the purpose of buildings obscured by neon, their slickness eroded by constant rain. This is the stuff of the future London i dream of, a one Burial soundtracked so well for me.

Image

pk-
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by pk- » Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:43 pm

too much steel & glass and not enough actual character in my opinion

every new building looks the same these days

User avatar
boomnoise
Posts: 6298
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:56 am
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by boomnoise » Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:09 pm

Surely that's the equivalent of architectural racism, isn't it?

The current trends are using a lot of steel and glass granted, and perhaps that will be the concrete of the near future but all new buildings hardly look the same.

Architecture seems to operate within very clear cut paradigms with regards to materials used, what do you prefer? I love lots of buildings across all styles and London for me is the best city in the world for this.

Steel and glass can be clinical if executed that way but there are numerous buildings which employ them well, resulting in great buildings, rich in character.

Modern no longer equates to monstrosity anymore like it did in the past few decades.

I want my cities to look like they could be featured in William Gibson books. I have to admit that.

User avatar
joseph-j
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: LDN E17

Post by joseph-j » Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:16 pm

pk- wrote:too much steel & glass and not enough actual character in my opinion

every new building looks the same these days
Its economics more than anything else.

But yeah, theres a lot planned for London. I work at an architectural consultancy, and its an exciting time for sure.

Be wary of those 3D modelling images of what "london might look like" - they've usually photoshopped all the other buildings to make the towers look more prominent.

alan
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:59 pm

Post by alan » Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:52 pm

the southbank concrete thing is a gem

london has some really nice arcutecture

that link has some ruff buildings, there already look dated imo

User avatar
boomnoise
Posts: 6298
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:56 am
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by boomnoise » Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:13 pm

deviating totally from skyscrapers now but i love the brunswick centre in it's original unrealised socail housing project form before they starting 'revitalising' with injections of consumerism and self cleaning glass.


Image

User avatar
joseph-j
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: LDN E17

Post by joseph-j » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:14 am

alan wrote:the southbank concrete thing is a gem
One of my favourites, I work opposite it.

So pissed off it made the shortlist of most hated buildings in the capital.

User avatar
mr. messer
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:34 pm
Location: SW16

Post by mr. messer » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:50 am

bollocks to skyscrapers....

im movin to tuscany i swear

kidabra
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:11 am
Location: leicester
Contact:

i guess

Post by kidabra » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:30 am

it means that spiderman will be able to get about a bit easier now !...should he wish to visit of course.

User avatar
ifp
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:35 pm

Post by ifp » Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:02 pm

all about that wierd thing on holloway road...

http://www.ivarhagendoorn.com/photos/ar ... london.jpg

pk-
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by pk- » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:24 am

The current trends are using a lot of steel and glass granted, and perhaps that will be the concrete of the near future but all new buildings hardly look the same.
yeah, it was a bit of a wild generalisation but i just doesn't seem to be much individualism most of the new buildings i've seen put up recently.

for example round the corner from my parents flat they've been building like mad in the last 6 or 7 years all down the euston road, what with the new UCH, welcome trust building and various other places, and to me they all look very samey

these aren't great photos, but i couldn't find anything better;

Image
welcome trust + UCH, left to right

Image

abbey national's offices (i think, at least that's who used to be there) and some nondescript offices to the left, along with the old euston tower

they're not identical per se but they're pretty unoriginal and not particularly..er...inspiring to look at, i suppose is what i mean. all down high holborn you'll find similar sort of places, to me they just seem like interchangeable characterless glass boxes

this is from a purely aesthetic viewpoint though, i'm sure they're works of engineering genius and all that

marsyas
Posts: 3034
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:31 pm

Post by marsyas » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:29 am

no need to americanize.

i seriously dislike being above say 20 floors...

User avatar
ifp
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:35 pm

Post by ifp » Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:43 am

yeah, i hate what theyre doing to the docklands. was alright when it was just canary wharf but now theres tons of huge skyscrapers and its just turned into some yuppie suit hell

User avatar
joseph-j
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: LDN E17

Post by joseph-j » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:47 am

As long as all the yuppie suits stay in one place, its ok. At least you know where to avoid them.... "don't go near the towers!"

sybian
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Sardinia

Post by sybian » Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:43 pm

I loved london for its old-and-new style crossing.. ;)

razer-wire
Posts: 383
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Location Location

Post by razer-wire » Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:13 pm

All about james and the Giant oringe..............................................
anyway i rekon ther should be more speric buldings not just cubeic
or simple buldings Well I shouldnt know ive never set foot in london :|

digital
Posts: 746
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by digital » Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:34 pm

MI:5 building is next....you know you is getting spitfired if u try anything there. :P:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests