Stopping people ripping you

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
swomp
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:48 pm
Location: South London

Stopping people ripping you

Post by swomp » Sat May 24, 2008 9:51 pm

Alright, me and my mate have got a tune ready for some publicity.

Just need some tips on stopping any random guy claiming it as theirs or whatever, any suggestions?

Does a simple copyright text work? Or do I need to register it? I've never had to do anything like this. Any advice apreciated. Thanks guys :)

User avatar
clubroot
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:57 pm

Post by clubroot » Sat May 24, 2008 10:03 pm

I've heard you should put it on a CD and post it back to yourself. Don't open it, just keep it if you need to use it (say as evidence in a court of law). When it gets back round to you It will have a royal mail stamp with a date. I've heard that this is a quick and easy way to copyright your work. May be wrong though, seems a little too simple?

User avatar
fixation
Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Daan Souf

Post by fixation » Sat May 24, 2008 10:31 pm

dmrichmond wrote:I've heard you should put it on a CD and post it back to yourself. Don't open it, just keep it if you need to use it (say as evidence in a court of law). When it gets back round to you It will have a royal mail stamp with a date. I've heard that this is a quick and easy way to copyright your work. May be wrong though, seems a little too simple?
yeh i heard this is the way, check the producing section at www.globalhardstyle.com, theres a good section on copyrighting

User avatar
swomp
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:48 pm
Location: South London

Post by swomp » Sat May 24, 2008 11:31 pm

cheers, much appreciated. Will find out more about more about this. Peas x

User avatar
djake
Posts: 4314
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:03 am
Location: I found my way out of the mine

Post by djake » Sun May 25, 2008 2:35 am

dmrichmond wrote:I've heard you should put it on a CD and post it back to yourself. Don't open it, just keep it if you need to use it (say as evidence in a court of law). When it gets back round to you It will have a royal mail stamp with a date. I've heard that this is a quick and easy way to copyright your work. May be wrong though, seems a little too simple?
i heard that so many times and just thought to myself that the person that was telling me was chatting shit. :lol:

User avatar
Tangka
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Oakland

Post by Tangka » Sun May 25, 2008 3:29 am

I've heard the same...

and while on the subject, i may be entering a contract and I have nobody to ask and not enough time to read a book on the god damn subject so...

does 50-50 net profits and 70-30 ownership (me having 70), aside from the small print, sound good for a digital release contract?

User avatar
robot redford
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Red Mist/ Basswerk/ Batterie
Contact:

Post by robot redford » Sun May 25, 2008 9:22 am

Earthling wrote:I've heard the same...

and while on the subject, i may be entering a contract and I have nobody to ask and not enough time to read a book on the god damn subject so...

does 50-50 net profits and 70-30 ownership (me having 70), aside from the small print, sound good for a digital release contract?
I can only tell from dnb side that 50/50 deals are standart. This goes for 'physical' releases (CD/vinyl) as also for digital releases.

Greetings,

Robot

docwra
Posts: 756
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:58 pm
Location: Ramsgate
Contact:

Post by docwra » Sun May 25, 2008 5:45 pm

In it copyrighted as soon as you've made it to yourself? To be honest you got the original project files so you always got that evidnece that it's yours

__________
Posts: 6338
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm

Post by __________ » Sun May 25, 2008 5:50 pm

become a member of the musician's union

http://www.musiciansunion.org.uk

do the post-it-to-yourself method. if you ever get into any copyright battles, the MU will represent you and fuck over whoever is trying to claim ownership of your music.

its not free to join, but it'll be worth it!

alan
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:59 pm

Post by alan » Sun May 25, 2008 6:18 pm

Earthling wrote:I've heard the same...

and while on the subject, i may be entering a contract and I have nobody to ask and not enough time to read a book on the god damn subject so...

does 50-50 net profits and 70-30 ownership (me having 70), aside from the small print, sound good for a digital release contract?
50-50 profit is standard.

i wouldn't be happy with anything other than 100% owner-ship tbh.

re; copyright. posting it to your self is something i do, im 90% sure it will stand up in a court of law but not 100%.
make sure they stamp it over the seal.

kwality
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:45 am
Location: The go
Contact:

Post by kwality » Mon May 26, 2008 2:07 am

50/50 is pretty much the norm with physical, often 60/40 or 70/30 with digital.

The ownership is an interesting one. To be honest if giving up 30% means the label is gonna push the tune onto comps/film/tv etc I'm more than happy to give it.

As far as copyright goes, as soon as you create you have it, and the post is a good back up. I've never worried about it too much really, seems way more prevalent in hip hop than other genres. Good old Timbaland is pretty good at it too!
Image

setspeed
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:36 pm

Post by setspeed » Mon May 26, 2008 7:50 am

the post thing is just a method of proof: in the UK, if you write something then you automatically own the copyright.

the reason people post stuff to themselves is that if it gets to a court situation, you can hold it up and say 'look, i can prove i had a copy of this last year, and this is the earliest copy that anyone has of it' (it's best to send it recorded post. but in this day and age, the fact that you've got a computer with all the individual files and can show how the thing was put together would probably also stand up.

personally i don't bother any more. you only get a couple of hundred squid at best out of a single and that's probably not worth going to court over anyway!

buzzy
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 2:08 am

Post by buzzy » Mon May 26, 2008 3:31 pm

In this day and age wouldn't you think that if somebody was the first person to upload a tune on a forum, that in itself should be evidence that it is their own music, considering that the date it was uploaded would prove that anybody who later uploaded a ripoff of it would need to have done so at a later date?

User avatar
twatty vagitis
Posts: 283
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: Croydon

Post by twatty vagitis » Mon May 26, 2008 7:01 pm

Buzzy wrote:In this day and age wouldn't you think that if somebody was the first person to upload a tune on a forum, that in itself should be evidence that it is their own music, considering that the date it was uploaded would prove that anybody who later uploaded a ripoff of it would need to have done so at a later date?
But no one would upload a tune to a forum they were considering selling would they.
Image

User avatar
Tangka
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Oakland

Post by Tangka » Tue May 27, 2008 2:08 am

kwality wrote:50/50 is pretty much the norm with physical, often 60/40 or 70/30 with digital.

The ownership is an interesting one. To be honest if giving up 30% means the label is gonna push the tune onto comps/film/tv etc I'm more than happy to give it.

As far as copyright goes, as soon as you create you have it, and the post is a good back up. I've never worried about it too much really, seems way more prevalent in hip hop than other genres. Good old Timbaland is pretty good at it too!
60-40 70-30 in who's favor?

hmm looks like I've gotta look into this ownership thing a bit more too

thanks guys

anyone else?

kwality
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:45 am
Location: The go
Contact:

Post by kwality » Tue May 27, 2008 2:38 am

60/40 in favour of the artist - this is digital mind you, so the outlay on the labels behalf is nowhere near what it is pressing wax. The best label situation though is one that's straight with you, tells you whats happening and supports your work. All the numbers are just a distraction to that I reckon.
Image

User avatar
Tangka
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: Oakland

Post by Tangka » Tue May 27, 2008 10:41 am

ok, understood

thanks kwality. stay up bro!

guess that's all I'll bother you guys about

buzzy
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 2:08 am

Post by buzzy » Thu May 29, 2008 1:31 pm

twatty vagitis wrote:
Buzzy wrote:In this day and age wouldn't you think that if somebody was the first person to upload a tune on a forum, that in itself should be evidence that it is their own music, considering that the date it was uploaded would prove that anybody who later uploaded a ripoff of it would need to have done so at a later date?
But no one would upload a tune to a forum they were considering selling would they.
Yes true, but I was coming at it more from the angle that you might want to deliberately give a freebie away to people, but you don't want somebody else trying to rip it off you and profiting from it themselves.
You might just want to get your music out there and distribute some tracks for free, but don't want someone to come along and take credit for it and profit from it.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests