The Mighty Thor
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:36 am
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
The Mighty Thor
Ok, so i know my way around a maelstrom or subtractor fair enough
but everytime i start working with the thor its like.. i can get a cool sound.. but i have no clue sometimes (mostly) whats goin on
if i start a cool sound and i want it to go in a different direction, i cant, cuz i dont know whats happening!
anyone have any tips for the thor, or some easy homemade patches to look at?
all the presets on it are tweaked to fuck!
but everytime i start working with the thor its like.. i can get a cool sound.. but i have no clue sometimes (mostly) whats goin on
if i start a cool sound and i want it to go in a different direction, i cant, cuz i dont know whats happening!
anyone have any tips for the thor, or some easy homemade patches to look at?
all the presets on it are tweaked to fuck!
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- twatty vagitis
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:01 pm
- Location: Croydon
There's a new series on the props site called "Thor Demystified", they're up to part 4 atm, link below to part 1.
http://www.propellerheads.se/substance/ ... cle=part19
http://www.propellerheads.se/substance/ ... cle=part19

-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:36 am
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Um, read the manual/help file?
Props do a good job of writing the thing to be clear and concise..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it is possible to break down the thor into different sections to learn about. These are:
the oscillators
the filters
the step sequencer
the mod matrix
the effects.
Oscillators:
Perhaps the most important one to understand is the different types of sound generation in the oscillator section. If you understand why each oscillator type works the way it does, you will have better control over what it does.
Filters & effects:
The filter and effects sections are self explanitory, or at least should be for a man of your bassline creation stature..!!
Step sequencer:
The step sequencer is simply like the matrix/arp device. Use it to control which note is played or to create a cv signal for controlling filter cut-offs etc. Great rhythmic cv modulations can be created within the thor.
Mod Matrix:
To get your head around the mod matrix, experiment and read the bloody manual!
It may also be useful to use another synth like Albino or Z3ta+ to learn to use mod matrixes. They do not have the benifit of rewiring cv cables as reason does.
Props do a good job of writing the thing to be clear and concise..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it is possible to break down the thor into different sections to learn about. These are:
the oscillators
the filters
the step sequencer
the mod matrix
the effects.
Oscillators:
Perhaps the most important one to understand is the different types of sound generation in the oscillator section. If you understand why each oscillator type works the way it does, you will have better control over what it does.
Filters & effects:
The filter and effects sections are self explanitory, or at least should be for a man of your bassline creation stature..!!
Step sequencer:
The step sequencer is simply like the matrix/arp device. Use it to control which note is played or to create a cv signal for controlling filter cut-offs etc. Great rhythmic cv modulations can be created within the thor.
Mod Matrix:
To get your head around the mod matrix, experiment and read the bloody manual!
It may also be useful to use another synth like Albino or Z3ta+ to learn to use mod matrixes. They do not have the benifit of rewiring cv cables as reason does.
truefutures_untold wrote: It may also be useful to use another synth like Albino or Z3ta+ to learn to use mod matrixes.
Its pretty basic routing thats found on all standard synths - they even put little arrows on for you
if you are comfortable with maelstrom you can apply the same concepts - you just need to get used to the different ocsillators

-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:36 am
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Thor is one of the reasons why I refuse to use Reason 4 instead of Reason 3/Reaper.... I'd much rather learn Massive, Z3ta+ or Vember Audio Surge than Thor. Those synths are all more powerful and have better GUI's to boot!!!
Fuck Reason 4!
---------------------------------
Sorry, I'm being very negative lol
Fuck Reason 4!

---------------------------------
Sorry, I'm being very negative lol

-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:36 am
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- twatty vagitis
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:01 pm
- Location: Croydon
They only reason to stick with 3 would be that you wouldn't have to learn the new sequencer. It took me like 2 weeks with 4 and I was even faster with it. But their long awaited updates leave something to be desired... mainly a VST compatible host! So I said fuck it. Ableton is now my prog. Honestly I don't even see the need to rewire Reason up to it, Ableton does everything that Reason does and does it better. Fuck it all together. It's becoming obsolete IMO, especially with the quick ass computers that everyone seems to have these days. The stability of it was pretty much the main thing they hung their hat on.futures_untold wrote:Thor is one of the reasons why I refuse to use Reason 4 instead of Reason 3/Reaper.... I'd much rather learn Massive, Z3ta+ or Vember Audio Surge than Thor. Those synths are all more powerful and have better GUI's to boot!!!
Fuck Reason 4!
---------------------------------
Sorry, I'm being very negative lol
-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:36 am
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Lol @ FSTZ comment! 
I think your right Widdler.
Once we find a production method and work flow that works, we can focus our time on being creative and sketching out our ideas.
R4 was unintuitive for me. R3/Reaper are for some reason like fisherprice my first sequencer..... clunky but easy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I actually teach kids how to produce music on computers so I have used many combinations of hardware/software setups.
Garageband & Ejay work well for beginers, Reason & FL for intermediate people, and Reason/DAW's for the dedicated.
I guess what is attractive about Reason, is that it is a virtual studio rack. As a tutor, it is useful to be able to explain production concepts with an easy visual aid to back up my explinations.
Using Reason I can show kids how hardware studios are wired up. The two synths have all the standard controls and the samplers have sample zones much like any hardware sampler would have.
The effects are bread & butter effects. It is useful to be able to demonstrate everything so quickly.
DAW's and programs like Ableton assume a certain amount of music production/studio knowledge for their use. If one is unable to see the wiring of an effects buss, why would it be logical to someone who isn't a seasoned music producer?
Me, I just want to get other people to produce my tunes now. I'll come up with ideas, then do a Dr Dre

I think your right Widdler.
Once we find a production method and work flow that works, we can focus our time on being creative and sketching out our ideas.
R4 was unintuitive for me. R3/Reaper are for some reason like fisherprice my first sequencer..... clunky but easy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I actually teach kids how to produce music on computers so I have used many combinations of hardware/software setups.
Garageband & Ejay work well for beginers, Reason & FL for intermediate people, and Reason/DAW's for the dedicated.
I guess what is attractive about Reason, is that it is a virtual studio rack. As a tutor, it is useful to be able to explain production concepts with an easy visual aid to back up my explinations.
Using Reason I can show kids how hardware studios are wired up. The two synths have all the standard controls and the samplers have sample zones much like any hardware sampler would have.
The effects are bread & butter effects. It is useful to be able to demonstrate everything so quickly.
DAW's and programs like Ableton assume a certain amount of music production/studio knowledge for their use. If one is unable to see the wiring of an effects buss, why would it be logical to someone who isn't a seasoned music producer?
Me, I just want to get other people to produce my tunes now. I'll come up with ideas, then do a Dr Dre

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests