Ever wondered why the Big Apple logo is a banana?
Ever wondered why the Big Apple logo is a banana?
I do. It keeps me up at night.
Seriously, what is the story behind it? Perhaps those Croydon folk just have a heightened sense of humour?
Seriously, what is the story behind it? Perhaps those Croydon folk just have a heightened sense of humour?
- djshiva
- Posts: 4933
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
- Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
- Contact:
actually, i HAVE wondered this. probably says something about the extent of my boredom.
Last edited by djshiva on Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
- blizzardmusic
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:21 pm
lol. never thought of that.
Soundcloud
If you like jungle / drum and bass you'll like the above!
Twitter: twitter.com/iamblizzard
If you like jungle / drum and bass you'll like the above!
Facebook: facebook.com/blizzarddubsdiss04 wrote:who?Pistonsbeneath wrote:no mention of blizzard?
Twitter: twitter.com/iamblizzard
-
jonnyrebel
- Posts: 2092
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:47 am
- Location: Lesta u slaaags
- Contact:
big apple, split banana
the two go hand in hand don't they?

the two go hand in hand don't they?
Last edited by nesslei on Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
i'm takin this show on the road.
www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!
www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!
- monsta l4l
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:33 pm
- juliun_c90
- Posts: 1127
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 10:33 am
- Location: Sheffield, UK
yes to apple records having an intellectual property case against them for trademark infringement, no to apple computers.scoz wrote:They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.
under IP law, you can only be found guilty of trademark infringement if your business is clearly within the same industry as the claimant's. in other words, the similarity in logos must be shown to pose a competitive threat to the claimant's business.
ie music = yes, computers = no.
(i think that's maybe one of the only things i retained from my IP course at law school)
i'm takin this show on the road.
www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!
www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!
- test conditions
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:07 pm
But also now of course, Apple own itunes which complicates matters somewhat as they've entered the music industry which they had agreed with Apple Corp not to do many years ago...hence the Beatles' back- catalogue taking so long to be made available in itunes.nesslei wrote:yes to apple records having an intellectual property case against them for trademark infringement, no to apple computers.scoz wrote:They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.
under IP law, you can only be found guilty of trademark infringement if your business is clearly within the same industry as the claimant's. in other words, the similarity in logos must be shown to pose a competitive threat to the claimant's business.
ie music = yes, computers = no.
(i think that's maybe one of the only things i retained from my IP course at law school)
But mainly, bananas are cooler.
yes, i thought about the iTunes factor. definitely complicates matters...Test Conditions wrote:But also now of course, Apple own itunes which complicates matters somewhat as they've entered the music industry which they had agreed with Apple Corp not to do many years ago...hence the Beatles' back- catalogue taking so long to be made available in itunes.nesslei wrote:yes to apple records having an intellectual property case against them for trademark infringement, no to apple computers.scoz wrote:They probably didn't consider it but Apple records (the beatles one) would probably have sued them, if they had used an apple as a logo. If not Apple Computers probably would have.
under IP law, you can only be found guilty of trademark infringement if your business is clearly within the same industry as the claimant's. in other words, the similarity in logos must be shown to pose a competitive threat to the claimant's business.
ie music = yes, computers = no.
(i think that's maybe one of the only things i retained from my IP course at law school)
But mainly, bananas are cooler.
intellectual property is actually a really interesting area of the law. if i practised it would definitely be in trademarks and patents.
i'm takin this show on the road.
www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!
www.twitter.com/nesslei
http://www.youtube.com/nessleii - ya get me!
-
skream
- >>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:23 pm
- Location: In the weatherspoons
- Contact:
it was purely out of madness.....
the original guy who owned apple just said it would be funny...
no lawsuits envolved....
the original guy who owned apple just said it would be funny...
no lawsuits envolved....
LIVE STREAM : rinse.fm
http://www.soundcloud.com/skreamizm
Email : Shouts@rinse.fm
MSN : rinse.fm@hotmail.com
-
flashharry
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:31 pm
- Location: wivelsfield
-
skream
- >>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:23 pm
- Location: In the weatherspoons
- Contact:
FlashHarry wrote:someone told me it meant 'MEN ONLY'
but ive yet to see evidence for or against this claim?
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
thats a fence......
no trespassing.....
im so mash i find this funny!!!!!!!!
LIVE STREAM : rinse.fm
http://www.soundcloud.com/skreamizm
Email : Shouts@rinse.fm
MSN : rinse.fm@hotmail.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

