Removing Backing Track With EQ?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
.klimaxx
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:55 am
Location: London

Removing Backing Track With EQ?

Post by .klimaxx » Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:53 am

For a while now it's been bugging me that I hear so many remixes of songs where the DJ or producer has managed to remove the backing track and keep the vocals - and i've been told that it is done using an EQ.

But I can't for the life of me work out how the hell to do it without making it sound like constipated dogs barking.. :oops:

Would really appreciate some advice, tips or even a tutorial...

Cheers :lol:

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Post by hugh » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:06 am

someone posted this question up a little while ago, i think you have to do a lot of working with the stereo field to isolate the vocals which should be sittin in the middle of the mix.
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

User avatar
marty
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:24 pm
Contact:

Post by marty » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:20 am

try some of the methods described on this site, there are also some links to some awesome programs i've never tested...

User avatar
blizzardmusic
Posts: 4819
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:21 pm

Post by blizzardmusic » Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:11 pm

marty wrote:try some of the methods described on this site, there are also some links to some awesome programs i've never tested...
Would it work if the vocal was delayed?
Soundcloud
If you like jungle / drum and bass you'll like the above! ;)
diss04 wrote:
Pistonsbeneath wrote:no mention of blizzard?
who?
Facebook: facebook.com/blizzarddubs
Twitter: twitter.com/iamblizzard

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:16 pm

Are you sure the DJ's used phase inversion techniques to isolate the vocals..?

My guess is that they bought the vinyl with the songs accapella on it! ;)

darkmatter
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 11:02 pm

Post by darkmatter » Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:13 pm

a lot of the times if it sounds like they had access to the original parts, it's because they had access to the original parts :wink:

if you have a digital copy of a tune and a digital copy of the acapella you could use phase inversion, it won't work so well with vinyl unless you use software to tweak it, cos the 'wow and flutter' means the decks will drift slightly out of time.

thetaco
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:35 am

Post by thetaco » Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:08 pm

phase inversion generally produces ass results, but if you're going to add a whole bunch of reverb and delay go for it.

Otherwise, my advice is to search out an acapella.

User avatar
thinking
Posts: 4753
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Bristal

Post by thinking » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:45 pm

you can also use a piece of software called Melodyne:

http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?i ... ne_theidea
BLACK BOX & BOX CLEVER

Image
paulie wrote:Thinking >>>> everyone else on this forum.

User avatar
legend4ry
Posts: 10589
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Woolwich

Post by legend4ry » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:27 pm

If you EQ it you *might* get a vocal what stands out but most of the time Ive found it will not have very good quality, either to treble or to bassy, even sticking a subtle reverbed sine under the treble(ly?) bits won't help.


Search for accapellas is your best bet! There IS a VST effect plugin I have what IS free, somewhere what does this all for you and what you're left with can be quite good, it depends how the song was EQ'd and mastered really, i'll try and find it, since I have more VSTs than someone even needs.....It might be a while
Soulstep wrote: My point is i just wanna hear more vibes
Soundcloud

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by abZ » Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:07 pm

I have done it before where I just high pass the tune a bit and then hide other parts of the song with my own sounds. It also requires your tune to match the key / chord progression but I think you would want that anyway so the vocals make sense musically.

User avatar
matthew_
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:32 am
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK

Post by matthew_ » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:47 pm

Melodyne is an auto-tune program, nothing to do with cutting vocals from a copy of the original song?

bitter
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Peckham Crew

Post by bitter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:46 pm

abZ wrote:I have done it before where I just high pass the tune a bit and then hide other parts of the song with my own sounds. It also requires your tune to match the key / chord progression but I think you would want that anyway so the vocals make sense musically.
I've done the same and it can work but really depends on the character of the original tune and how much is going on underneath the vocals. Heavy cuts with an EQ and good use of a gate can work, it leaves you with the vocal but certainly not the full range/sound of it. If you want to keep all the properties of the voice your best bet is to use an accapella... just make sure its in tune. ;-)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests