Not really! Sometimes stuff just fit inSerox wrote:I should have an EQ on every sound tho really.
ROLLING off frequencies
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- Disco Nutter
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:39 pm
- Location: Eastern Europe
- Contact:
Yeh I guess so.Johnny Beat wrote:Not really! Sometimes stuff just fit inSerox wrote:I should have an EQ on every sound tho really.
I have to admit I actually spend more time finding a sound that fits and requires zero work instead of spending a week trying to make this sound fit etc
I am glad I am lazy sometimes.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.
-
macc
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Finding sounds that naturally fit together is the optimum way to mix!
Don't see too many eq's on an orchestra...
Don't see too many eq's on an orchestra...
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
-
macc
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Steeper filters/eqs ring more though, resonance controls or not - perhaps that's what he was referring to
Plus there are amplitude ripple effects around and just above the cutoff which can give a similar impression.

Plus there are amplitude ripple effects around and just above the cutoff which can give a similar impression.
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
-
macc
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Everything has a cost innit, it's always just a question of whether the benefit outweighs the cost. It depends
You see people talking about obsessing over having zero frequency content in their snare at 199.9Hz cos you 'have to' high pass it at 200Hz. Meanwhile their snare turns to mush as it smears out in the time domain
Sorry for derailing the thread somewhat
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
dead on. the steeper the filter, the more things build up at the cutoff point, boost or not. resonance isn't just a setting-- it can happen in a number of ways.Macc wrote:Steeper filters/eqs ring more though, resonance controls or not - perhaps that's what he was referring to![]()
Plus there are amplitude ripple effects around and just above the cutoff which can give a similar impression.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests