seckle wrote:
15 to 25 years from now, when you all have children, and they get to an age where they're old enough to start letting music get under their skin a bit, what do you think will be the best way to show them music...
a. by giving them a harddrive or ipod full of mp3's, that have no real legacy, nothing tangible that they can look at without a screen or hold in their hands, no liner notes, no sense of the past or nostalgia, no crackle, no fragility....
or
b. a dozen crates full of vinyl, that has an immediate legacy.... that you've protected, built, cared for, loved and obsessed over for decades and that now they can take from you and carry it further for their kids and so on.... you can show to them the big tunes from back in the day, and reminisce about them, open their eyes to things, and show them that music isn't all disposable or a bunch of 1's and 0's.
I do get you man. But I don't really think about music as a physical product, but something for my ear's to enjoy. Perhaps this is because I make music and well as enjoy it.... I dunno.
I have a mate who is a proper vinyl head, complete with the £1500 turntable. I do admire his enthusiasm and when you search through a load of vinyl, pull it out and play it you do in some way listen alot more than clicking though iTunes.... i supose.
I think there will always be a market for vinyl, one which has recently grown across the board, but think the strict vinyl only consensus in most dubstep and all dnb raves will soon switch to digital and it will be better for it.
seckle wrote: society and corporations are training us to think that we have to see our world from a profitable, fast moving, advantageous side only. we don't think anymore about the idea that human creativity needs to be protected and developed. if you can't see that constantly moving faster and faster as a creative artistic person, is not always the best way forward, then you're in for a rude awakening somewhere down the line on the express train to whereever you think you need to be....
I don't think this is about wanting to do thing's quickly, easily or skipping thing's out. Progression in genre's, in my view, is essential and much more likely in a digital world.
Anyway... I think this is a debate that will never be resolved to be honest. It will just take time for more big name dj's to go digital, labels to release digital only and specialist dubstep download site's for underground music to get big.
You will probably see Scram and Benga on the native instrument's advert's with Ritchie Hawtin in the next couple of years.
Dubstepz