best era for mixdowns
					Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
	By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
best era for mixdowns
so many different possibilities but let's have a talk...
you've got 60s which were not that great but were sort of pioneering the idea
70s...70s drum sound, 60s artists disappearing up their arses and having loads of money to experiment with different drugs and more importantly sounds. as i said before 70s drum sound.
80s, debatable whether it was good, very defineable but 'good' is down to taste.
90s, this is getting long but you've got a lot to choose from - dance music, rock music
00s, pop, dance, indie, rock, metal. there's loads to choose from, the age when sound might be more important than music. pro tools, not tape.
this is garbled bollocks but the question still stands, which was your favourite 'sound'? which do you think was/is the most technically advanced/proficient?
			
			
									
									
						you've got 60s which were not that great but were sort of pioneering the idea
70s...70s drum sound, 60s artists disappearing up their arses and having loads of money to experiment with different drugs and more importantly sounds. as i said before 70s drum sound.
80s, debatable whether it was good, very defineable but 'good' is down to taste.
90s, this is getting long but you've got a lot to choose from - dance music, rock music
00s, pop, dance, indie, rock, metal. there's loads to choose from, the age when sound might be more important than music. pro tools, not tape.
this is garbled bollocks but the question still stands, which was your favourite 'sound'? which do you think was/is the most technically advanced/proficient?
- 
				deadly_habit
 - Posts: 22980
 - Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
 - Location: MURRICA
 
I am a large fan of 70's recordings.  I mean it was all analog.  Everything was done in legit studios with very high end gear.  And they didn't try to brickwall everything in the mastering stages.  In the early 80's everything went down hill with the overuse of drum machines and synthesizers I am sad to say.  But if you listen to any artists work that was big in the 70's and 80's listen to their work in order you will see.  I like the 90's better than either the 80's or the 00's.  Prior to the 70's there were defo some good recordings but they were still basically recording everything live up until the late 60's and like I said they didn't really master the multi-track until the 70's.
70's imo.
			
			
									
									
						70's imo.
- 
				macc
 - Posts: 1737
 - Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
 - Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
 - Contact:
 
Miles Davis - Kind Of Blue
Grachan Moncur III - Evolution (in the Mosaic Select box set as remastered by Ron McMaster)
And that's the end of it
			
			
									
									Grachan Moncur III - Evolution (in the Mosaic Select box set as remastered by Ron McMaster)
And that's the end of it
www.scmastering.com  / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
						- 
				deadly_habit
 - Posts: 22980
 - Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
 - Location: MURRICA
 
I quite like the sound of the old ska and rocksteady tunes where they are clearly only recording on one or two microphones at most, and the drums are reduced to an odd sounding thunk when the snare hits. Lo-fi to the point of being ridiculous but still sounding good somehow.
Otherwise i'm a big fan of 80's sounds. The Cure's Disintegration (admittedly very late 80's) sounds amazing, the only word to describe it is rich, sucks you in.
In contrast their most recent album sounds exactly like the late 2000s, brickwalled, treble-heavy, clipping in several places and squashed so bad you can't actually hear what is going on. Shame because song-wise it's pretty good.
Next decade people need to sort that shit out
			
			
									
									
						Otherwise i'm a big fan of 80's sounds. The Cure's Disintegration (admittedly very late 80's) sounds amazing, the only word to describe it is rich, sucks you in.
In contrast their most recent album sounds exactly like the late 2000s, brickwalled, treble-heavy, clipping in several places and squashed so bad you can't actually hear what is going on. Shame because song-wise it's pretty good.
Next decade people need to sort that shit out
- 
				macc
 - Posts: 1737
 - Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
 - Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
 - Contact:
 
Someone here knows the score!!B-LAM wrote:shape of jazz to come and giant steps
Lonely Woman
www.scmastering.com  / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
						Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

