Re: Cracked software = cracked sound
Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 6:44 am
Technology is evolving, i mean it always has, but currently the rate is exponential.
When Aphex Twin was making DrukQs he was using some top of the line technology [amongst his hardware] while i'm sure there where many people that viewed computers and software as some kind of devastation to electronic music, and by now that technology is vastly inferior to an iMac.
Yes, the majority of most people these days that are into music, but not that into music think it's better to just a rip a 4 kbps copy of the track they want off youtube. Personally, Youtube has been essential to me finding and buying tracks i like, and i think it should function that way as a tool for DJ's looking for tunes, producers looking for inspiration, and the people genuinely interested in hearing something they don't hear in their place of work, or on FM radio.
Audio has been at the front of the technological changes within the last decade. It was musicians using cloud technology before it caught on for entertainment [i think there's a difference between entertainment and art, which i think the lack of a distinction between the 2 is why music, painting, animation, and other forms of art suffer because of the perception that art is superfluous or secondary to breaking backs for monopoly money]
It has largely been Youtube users who upload electronic music that take advantage of 720p and 1080p settings, where as the majority of rock and metal uploads are more often than not in 240p.
I'd like to see how this plays out as things continue to grow and evolve. I got really interested in this subject after i read a blog posted by Blu Mar Ten, i think it's a great read for an objective look at the situation and i would recommend it to anyone else interested in the subject, but also to anyone who is entirely for or against piracy
... i can't find it, might have been taken down. i'll post it if i can find it, it was a very interesting read
When Aphex Twin was making DrukQs he was using some top of the line technology [amongst his hardware] while i'm sure there where many people that viewed computers and software as some kind of devastation to electronic music, and by now that technology is vastly inferior to an iMac.
Yes, the majority of most people these days that are into music, but not that into music think it's better to just a rip a 4 kbps copy of the track they want off youtube. Personally, Youtube has been essential to me finding and buying tracks i like, and i think it should function that way as a tool for DJ's looking for tunes, producers looking for inspiration, and the people genuinely interested in hearing something they don't hear in their place of work, or on FM radio.
Audio has been at the front of the technological changes within the last decade. It was musicians using cloud technology before it caught on for entertainment [i think there's a difference between entertainment and art, which i think the lack of a distinction between the 2 is why music, painting, animation, and other forms of art suffer because of the perception that art is superfluous or secondary to breaking backs for monopoly money]
It has largely been Youtube users who upload electronic music that take advantage of 720p and 1080p settings, where as the majority of rock and metal uploads are more often than not in 240p.
I'd like to see how this plays out as things continue to grow and evolve. I got really interested in this subject after i read a blog posted by Blu Mar Ten, i think it's a great read for an objective look at the situation and i would recommend it to anyone else interested in the subject, but also to anyone who is entirely for or against piracy
... i can't find it, might have been taken down. i'll post it if i can find it, it was a very interesting read
