Re: do you think humanity is worth saving?
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:54 am
i read in a david icke book (the biggest secret) that white people were put in isolation tanks and their circadian rhythms alligned with the rotation of mars
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
i reckon panspermia is how we get humans all over the place, and some humans from some other place came to another place where there's humans and fucked the place up real goodneon-dubz wrote:What made them come here?
Panspermia or something like that?
This is a truly great post.parson wrote:i reckon there's a singular drive that all of humanity has that manifests in a number of different ways. it is basically philanthropism and altruism. people wanna do good. the problem is that modeltheistically speaking, any remotely different idea of how to do good is going to be inherently bad. everybody thinks they've got the one and only way to do good. this is why democrats hate republicans and why sunnis hate shi'as and potheads hate cops.
so the problem with the world isn't that people are dumb or people are bad. it's that people have tunnel vision. it's all a form of xenophobia.
parson wrote:it is now important to make a clear distinction about "human" actions.
some humans are the indigenous earth people.
some humans are babylon.
I’m all for arguing about whether human beings are a disaster area or not but if we’re going into stoner Sci Fi comic book territory I’m out.parson wrote:i read in a david icke book (the biggest secret) that white people were put in isolation tanks and their circadian rhythms alligned with the rotation of mars
Yeah, that's about right.parson wrote:i reckon there's a singular drive that all of humanity has that manifests in a number of different ways. it is basically philanthropism and altruism. people wanna do good. the problem is that modeltheistically speaking, any remotely different idea of how to do good is going to be inherently bad. everybody thinks they've got the one and only way to do good. this is why democrats hate republicans and why sunnis hate shi'as and potheads hate cops.
so the problem with the world isn't that people are dumb or people are bad. it's that people have tunnel vision. it's all a form of xenophobia.
yeah, i bet the republicans and democrats fight for their idea of well-doing, not for their group/individual materialistic interests disguised and sold as public interest for tv addicts. political parties have never acted like legal mafia clans or serving different lobbies and financial interests, sureparson wrote:i reckon there's a singular drive that all of humanity has that manifests in a number of different ways. it is basically philanthropism and altruism. people wanna do good. the problem is that modeltheistically speaking, any remotely different idea of how to do good is going to be inherently bad. everybody thinks they've got the one and only way to do good. this is why democrats hate republicans and why sunnis hate shi'as and potheads hate cops.
so the problem with the world isn't that people are dumb or people are bad. it's that people have tunnel vision. it's all a form of xenophobia.
Panspermia is the spreading of the chemical compounds that form the basic building blocks of life from outerspace to a planet. Not the travel of fully formed species through the galaxy.parson wrote:i reckon panspermia is how we get humans all over the place, and some humans from some other place came to another place where there's humans and fucked the place up real goodneon-dubz wrote:What made them come here?
Panspermia or something like that?
Seeing as 'species' (which is an entirely human construct) have been going extinct all the time, that's impossible.parson wrote:a clever cancer is still cancer. no other species on earth is cancer. every other species is a vital organ.
the problem with this is that you are saying that cancer is innately wrong - a thought process completely moulded by 21st century western principles. cancer is sad, tragic, unfortunate fact of life, but it is just that - a fact of life, it is something that is unavoidable, and as such is something that needs to be coped with. none of us can claim responsibility for how we have ended up at the stage we are in evolution, but the more we learn about the balance of life, the more we need to focus on self improvement and awareness, rather than deeming everything as not worth saving. and it is worth remembering that life isnt the delicate, fragile wispy thing people imagine it to be, life wants to fight to survive. think of all the setbacks there have been in the process of evolution that have brought us here, but we are still here. and as long as we want to try and save ourselves, then we have every right to be saved.parson wrote:a clever cancer is still cancer. no other species on earth is cancer. every other species is a vital organ.
We know.Genevieve wrote:Panspermia is the spreading of the chemical compounds that form the basic building blocks of life from outerspace to a planet. Not the travel of fully formed species through the galaxy.parson wrote:i reckon panspermia is how we get humans all over the place, and some humans from some other place came to another place where there's humans and fucked the place up real goodneon-dubz wrote:What made them come here?
Panspermia or something like that?
ResetTheAtari wrote:we poured the money from all the wars it causes into research.
Nah, parson truly believes that panspermia is something that contradicts evolution.neon-dubz wrote:We know.Genevieve wrote:Panspermia is the spreading of the chemical compounds that form the basic building blocks of life from outerspace to a planet. Not the travel of fully formed species through the galaxy.parson wrote:i reckon panspermia is how we get humans all over the place, and some humans from some other place came to another place where there's humans and fucked the place up real goodneon-dubz wrote:What made them come here?
Panspermia or something like that?
because then there wouldn't be any people left to have the same circular arguments with each other whilst rarely displaying enough humility to actually accept they might be wrong occasionally.... oh right... you said "bad"Genevieve wrote:Anyway, I still await a proper explanation on why a lifeless planet Earth is inherently bad.
people are inherently selfish, and look out mainly for number 1.parson wrote:i reckon there's a singular drive that all of humanity has that manifests in a number of different ways. it is basically philanthropism and altruism. people wanna do good. the problem is that modeltheistically speaking, any remotely different idea of how to do good is going to be inherently bad. everybody thinks they've got the one and only way to do good. this is why democrats hate republicans and why sunnis hate shi'as and potheads hate cops.
so the problem with the world isn't that people are dumb or people are bad. it's that people have tunnel vision. it's all a form of xenophobia.
then PEACE OUTuncle bill wrote:
I’m all for arguing about whether human beings are a disaster area or not but if we’re going into stoner Sci Fi comic book territory I’m out.