Page 7 of 8

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:16 pm
by kay
Video has been removed for bla bla bla....

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:17 pm
by wub
From Rusko's Twitter feed;

"Still a timeline full of tweets about it... I DID NOT PRODUCE THE NEW BRITNEY TUNE. pass it on."

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:19 pm
by kay
He's gonna be wishing for the good old days of the Rusko nipple tweets.

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:24 pm
by WatchYourStep
wub wrote:But this isn't about moss.
I wanted to see where this was going, tbh.

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:44 pm
by FluidMoShun
Big MD wrote:
WatchYourStep wrote:
Big MD wrote:as long we all hold together and keep supporting each other
Sorry to tell you this, but dubstep has grown beyond this forum. As such, very little of what happens "in here" has an effect "out there". (No, I'm not saying we should all fuck off. I'm still here, aren't I?) What this means is that no amount of us "holding together" will guide dubstep on its course anymore. Dubstep has turned 18 and moved out of his parents' house.

a plant won't grow without its roots.

Even if, we could proudly say we all was a part of the revolution of pop music? :'D (english humor)
Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of it's own that will most likely die soon.

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:07 pm
by WatchYourStep
FluidMoShun wrote:Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of its own that will most likely die soon.
"Its own"!! There are two forms, you want the possessive form. "It's" is a contraction of the words "it" and "is".

This is actually one of those times where, by adding that apostrophe, you actually had to work harder to be wrong.

Fucking kids these days...

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:36 pm
by FluidMoShun
WatchYourStep wrote:
FluidMoShun wrote:Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of its own that will most likely die soon.
"Its own"!! There are two forms, you want the possessive form. "It's" is a contraction of the words "it" and "is".

This is actually one of those times where, by adding that apostrophe, you actually had to work harder to be wrong.

Fucking kids these days...
I'll improperly use the contraction "it's" whenever the fuck I want. Its what I do and I don't give a shit if it's usage is in correct.

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:40 pm
by WatchYourStep
FluidMoShun wrote:
WatchYourStep wrote:
FluidMoShun wrote:Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of its own that will most likely die soon.
"Its own"!! There are two forms, you want the possessive form. "It's" is a contraction of the words "it" and "is".

This is actually one of those times where, by adding that apostrophe, you actually had to work harder to be wrong.

Fucking kids these days...
I'll improperly use the contraction "it's" whenever the fuck I want. Its what I do and I don't give a shit if it's usage is in correct.
Don't you mean "Ill improperly use the contraction"?

Wow you even suck at being wrong on purpose...

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:42 pm
by mVI
FluidMoShun wrote:I'll improperly use the contraction "it's" whenever the fuck I want. Its what I do and I don't give a shit if it's usage is in correct.
Image

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:43 pm
by FluidMoShun
WatchYourStep wrote:
FluidMoShun wrote:
WatchYourStep wrote:
FluidMoShun wrote:Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of its own that will most likely die soon.
"Its own"!! There are two forms, you want the possessive form. "It's" is a contraction of the words "it" and "is".

This is actually one of those times where, by adding that apostrophe, you actually had to work harder to be wrong.

Fucking kids these days...
I'll improperly use the contraction "it's" whenever the fuck I want. Its what I do and I don't give a shit if it's usage is in correct.
Don't you mean "Ill improperly use the contraction"?

Wow you even suck at being wrong on purpose...
When did I say anything about improperly using the contraction "I'll"?

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:44 pm
by WatchYourStep
FluidMoShun wrote:
WatchYourStep wrote:
FluidMoShun wrote:
WatchYourStep wrote:
FluidMoShun wrote:Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of its own that will most likely die soon.
"Its own"!! There are two forms, you want the possessive form. "It's" is a contraction of the words "it" and "is".

This is actually one of those times where, by adding that apostrophe, you actually had to work harder to be wrong.

Fucking kids these days...
I'll improperly use the contraction "it's" whenever the fuck I want. Its what I do and I don't give a shit if it's usage is in correct.
Don't you mean "Ill improperly use the contraction"?

Wow you even suck at being wrong on purpose...
When did I say anything about improperly using the contraction "I'll"?
I guess you didn't. That's my bad

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:05 pm
by AllNightDayDream
wub wrote:From Rusko's Twitter feed;

"Still a timeline full of tweets about it... I DID NOT PRODUCE THE NEW BRITNEY TUNE. pass it on."
Any twat worth his weight would know he didn't produce it after listening to it for 5 seconds

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:39 pm
by Pada
Music Genres have to get shit otherwise nothing new would ever come, if jungle and garage were still great wouldn't have been needed.


Not necessarily my views but wondering what people think.

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:54 pm
by crackf
(Pada) wrote:Music Genres have to get shit otherwise nothing new would ever come, if jungle and garage were still great wouldn't have been needed.


Not necessarily my views but wondering what people think.
WOULDNT HAVE NEEDED TO WHAT!?!?!?

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:55 pm
by wolf89
It's just a pop song. Why do any of you give a fuck?

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:10 pm
by Big MD
FluidMoShun wrote:
Big MD wrote:
WatchYourStep wrote:
Big MD wrote:as long we all hold together and keep supporting each other
Sorry to tell you this, but dubstep has grown beyond this forum. As such, very little of what happens "in here" has an effect "out there". (No, I'm not saying we should all fuck off. I'm still here, aren't I?) What this means is that no amount of us "holding together" will guide dubstep on its course anymore. Dubstep has turned 18 and moved out of his parents' house.

a plant won't grow without its roots.

Even if, we could proudly say we all was a part of the revolution of pop music? :'D (english humor)
Thus plants undergo mitosis so they can create new, similar plants. I consider britney-step, skrillex and the like to be the half-retarded, failed abortion of dubstep that somehow germinated into a plant of it's own that will most likely die soon.

let's say, the major labels are trying to graft theyr own dubstep plant on a pop root. and a graft of what ever, is never dieing emediatly. only time can say if it's working or not. one thing is shore, dubstep elements wil be a new part of pop music, same as hiphop or garage elements are implemented in pop music.

there's hip-hop and there is pop-hop. did hip-hop die? hiphop has just become stronger!

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:19 pm
by wolf89
Boring bastards

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:29 pm
by basl
signals wrote:why didnt they just repeat that good part and make it a instrumental

:corntard:
:z:

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:32 pm
by flyingointment
Image

Re: Mainstream dubstep Ep. 1: Britney Spears

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:43 pm
by 64hz
basl wrote:
signals wrote:why dont you just repeat that good part and make it a remix

:corntard:
(fix'd)
???
profit