im not saying dubstep isnt formulaic, but i dont think that the characterture of dark hard dubstep is appropriate anymore, at least not for the central scene. all the biggest tunes seem to me to be high energy, if still with a snare on the half bar, and most of the big dancefloor stuff that i hear is silly rather than dark. but i would agree that its still a very masculine soundm9918868 wrote:That's ok. I did phrase my opinion problably a tad more provocative than necessary.elgato wrote:i dont want to be a dick, but this is a little annoying.
I know there is more out there than just an angry wobble or a cheecky refix. Still, it's annoying me how much and especially how fast dubstep is loosing its subtlety and inventiveness. It's a bit silly to claim dubstep as a non-formulaic genre when the formula is clearly kicking in. It's a pity, because this formula surely isn't the most interesting one.elgato wrote:i dont like most dubstep that i hear now but...the darker-than-thou thing is at least 6 months out of date, more like 12. if anything the balance is with silly ravey wobblers nowadays, and a lack of po-face! i cant understand people who are still characterising the scene as dominated by dark meditative halfstep
and in any case, do you really think that refixes are the only other thing happening in the scene?
as i see it, plenty of people in dubstep are still breaking boundaries
Oh and about the darkness. I am all for music that explores all possible emotions, but who on earth decided that it always should be dark? I, for one, would love to hear some bright dubstep.
either way i do mainly agree with you, compared to a few years back its a different thing, much less diversity in the central sound. but its seemed that way for quite a while, and theres still loads of amazing stuff coming out of it, so i try to look at it half full...