Re: The Game JACKS Mala
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:36 pm
You guys really need to stop wasting your time on this thread. Jesus.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
You aren't?vishes wrote:You guys really need to stop wasting your time on this thread. Jesus.
So selling a track on vinyl isn't for monetary gain, but putting out a free download is?hutyluty wrote:if anything alicia's more a bootleg than anything else.. its a dubstep remix of an alicia keys song which the person knows before buying on white label, kind of thing which has been done for ages. Whether this sort of thing is cool is different but i'd argue he did it more for the art and his own enjoyment than to make money out of it but w/edubfordessert wrote:
he barely messed around with feeling u feeling me at all. all the original instrumentation and vocal is there, IN ITS ENTIRETY, he just added a few things, repeated bits and altered the way it sounded a little bit. the game lifted ONE short vocal sample from a track and put it on a new track. big deal.
the sample which the changes bit is nicked off is a vocal taken and manipulated to create a whole new feeling from the original and then replayed in the exact same way with no credit- for monetary gain
Did you mean to quote my question? Because that's not an answer.rayman612 wrote:because the game track has the exact same vocal modifications as in the mala track?therapist wrote:
Just out of interest, do you know for a fact that when you sample something (assuming you have, you've got a SC link there) it's not a track that has sampled someone else?
It's just seems a completely arbitrary thing to get annoyed about.
nah ehbrums already posted this on my wall, even tho it's shit I think it's kind of cool he (or the guy who made his beat) knew about the tune and decided to use itteamhobson wrote:Oh shit, inb4 Sonika puts a hit out on the game.
exactly, only two options can come out of this:hugh wrote:I can almost guarantee that Mala won't be bothered by this
rayman612 wrote:i think the majority of west coast rappers are garbage
i'm saying mala was open about it- he made it pretty obvious like.kidshuffle wrote:what does that have to do with anything?hutyluty wrote:if anything alicia's more a bootleg than anything else.. its a dubstep remix of an alicia keys song which the person knows before buying on white label, kind of thing which has been done for ages. Whether this sort of thing is cool is different but i'd argue he did it more for the art and his own enjoyment than to make money out of it but w/edubfordessert wrote:
he barely messed around with feeling u feeling me at all. all the original instrumentation and vocal is there, IN ITS ENTIRETY, he just added a few things, repeated bits and altered the way it sounded a little bit. the game lifted ONE short vocal sample from a track and put it on a new track. big deal.
the sample which the changes bit is nicked off is a vocal taken and manipulated to create a whole new feeling from the original and then replayed in the exact same way with no credit- for monetary gain
and look at EVERY HIP HOP SONG PRE-1994. EVERY SAMPLE IS HARDLY MANIPULATED AND WE STILL SEE IT AS DOPE.
You are all just hating because someone touched the untouchable Mala
ok yeah i do like those guys... but thats underground, i was thinking tupac/snoop/dre west coastkingldub wrote:rayman612 wrote:i think the majority of west coast rappers are garbage
Whoa now......Pharcyde, Souls of Mischief, People Under The Stairs, Freestyle Fellowship, Busdriver, Zion I, MURS, Abstract Rude, and Blackalicious, to name just a handful are all great.
hutyluty wrote:just that I personally wouldn't find it cool to go and sample something someone's already sampled straight up or at least not in the exact same way, its just cunty.
lol i didn't even realise it was a free downloadcollige wrote:So selling a track on vinyl isn't for monetary gain, but putting out a free download is?hutyluty wrote:if anything alicia's more a bootleg than anything else.. its a dubstep remix of an alicia keys song which the person knows before buying on white label, kind of thing which has been done for ages. Whether this sort of thing is cool is different but i'd argue he did it more for the art and his own enjoyment than to make money out of it but w/edubfordessert wrote:
he barely messed around with feeling u feeling me at all. all the original instrumentation and vocal is there, IN ITS ENTIRETY, he just added a few things, repeated bits and altered the way it sounded a little bit. the game lifted ONE short vocal sample from a track and put it on a new track. big deal.
the sample which the changes bit is nicked off is a vocal taken and manipulated to create a whole new feeling from the original and then replayed in the exact same way with no credit- for monetary gain
you've not demonstrated why sampling an element of a track which is a modification of an original work is any different to sampling an element which is itself original. if anything the latter is less justifiable than the former, not the other way around.rayman612 wrote:this isnt about reusing samples
its about reusing samples of samples after theyve been modified into something different
ppl in this thread need to quit putting words into each other's mouths & just read what they wrote